80 lines
3.0 KiB
Markdown
80 lines
3.0 KiB
Markdown
---
|
|
# These are optional elements. Feel free to remove any of them.
|
|
status: {proposed | rejected | accepted | deprecated | … | superseded by [ADR-0005](0005-example.md)}
|
|
date: {YYYY-MM-DD when the decision was last updated}
|
|
deciders: {list everyone involved in the decision}
|
|
consulted: {list everyone whose opinions are sought (typically subject-matter experts); and with whom there is a two-way communication}
|
|
informed: {list everyone who is kept up-to-date on progress; and with whom there is a one-way communication}
|
|
---
|
|
# {short title of solved problem and solution}
|
|
|
|
## Context and Problem Statement
|
|
|
|
{Describe the context and problem statement, e.g., in free form using two to three sentences or in the form of an illustrative story.
|
|
You may want to articulate the problem in form of a question and add links to collaboration boards or issue management systems.}
|
|
|
|
<!-- This is an optional element. Feel free to remove. -->
|
|
## Decision Drivers
|
|
|
|
* {decision driver 1, e.g., a force, facing concern, …}
|
|
* {decision driver 2, e.g., a force, facing concern, …}
|
|
* … <!-- numbers of drivers can vary -->
|
|
|
|
## Considered Options
|
|
|
|
* {title of option 1}
|
|
* {title of option 2}
|
|
* {title of option 3}
|
|
* … <!-- numbers of options can vary -->
|
|
|
|
## Decision Outcome
|
|
|
|
Chosen option: "{title of option 1}", because
|
|
{justification. e.g., only option, which meets k.o. criterion decision driver | which resolves force {force} | … | comes out best (see below)}.
|
|
|
|
<!-- This is an optional element. Feel free to remove. -->
|
|
### Consequences
|
|
|
|
* Good, because {positive consequence, e.g., improvement of one or more desired qualities, …}
|
|
* Bad, because {negative consequence, e.g., compromising one or more desired qualities, …}
|
|
* … <!-- numbers of consequences can vary -->
|
|
|
|
<!-- This is an optional element. Feel free to remove. -->
|
|
## Validation
|
|
|
|
{describe how the implementation of/compliance with the ADR is validated. E.g., by a review or an ArchUnit test}
|
|
|
|
<!-- This is an optional element. Feel free to remove. -->
|
|
## Pros and Cons of the Options
|
|
|
|
### {title of option 1}
|
|
|
|
<!-- This is an optional element. Feel free to remove. -->
|
|
{example | description | pointer to more information | …}
|
|
|
|
* Good, because {argument a}
|
|
* Good, because {argument b}
|
|
<!-- use "neutral" if the given argument weights neither for good nor bad -->
|
|
* Neutral, because {argument c}
|
|
* Bad, because {argument d}
|
|
* … <!-- numbers of pros and cons can vary -->
|
|
|
|
### {title of other option}
|
|
|
|
{example | description | pointer to more information | …}
|
|
|
|
* Good, because {argument a}
|
|
* Good, because {argument b}
|
|
* Neutral, because {argument c}
|
|
* Bad, because {argument d}
|
|
* …
|
|
|
|
<!-- This is an optional element. Feel free to remove. -->
|
|
## More Information
|
|
|
|
{You might want to provide additional evidence/confidence for the decision outcome here and/or
|
|
document the team agreement on the decision and/or
|
|
define when this decision when and how the decision should be realized and if/when it should be re-visited and/or
|
|
how the decision is validated.
|
|
Links to other decisions and resources might here appear as well.}
|