• split Xinit into XinitN and Xinit macro, the former
not initialising the “xp” argument of the latter,
and use this to get rid of two variables that are
only assigned but never referenced (gcc doesn’t see
this, but MIPSpro and IIRC SUNWcc do)
• re-indent while here
• bump patchlevel
‣ I/O redirection seems broken:
$ (date; date >/dev/null; date) | wc -l
1 (expected: 2)
‣ other than that: working fine
‣ -YBSD (default) and -YSYSTEM_FIVE don’t work, just -YPOSIX, somehow
• Fix $(…) to `…` for OSF/1 V2.0 /bin/sh
‣ this compiler is FUBAR though:
$ cat >t.c
main() { return (foo()); }
$ cc t.c
ld:
Unresolved :
foo
$ echo $?
0
$ ls -l a.out
-rwxr-xr-x 1 mirbsd users 10835 Jul 21 17:12 a.out
‣ it seems to have ucode, but man is not installed
• new mirtoconf check: mkstemp(3)
• if !HAVE_MKSTEMP (Ultrix), use tempnam(3)
• only use printf(1) if it exists (it doesn’t on Ultrix)
• a few more signals
• add S_ISLNK if the OS doesn’t define it
• add strcasecmp(3) proto for Ultrix (it _is_ in <portability.h>, but
only for -YBSD I think)
• fgrep(1) on Ultrix doesn’t do “-e ① -e ②”
10x DEChengst:#UnixNL for giving access
| csh -cf '/command/svscanboot &'
and
| /usr/mpkg/bin/pgrphack /usr/mpkg/bin/svscanboot &
can now be replaced with
| /bin/mksh -T- /usr/mpkg/bin/svscanboot
| OSF1 rubbereendje.dechengst.nl V5.1 2650 alpha
with the vendor compiler:
| Compaq C V6.5-011 on HP Tru64 UNIX V5.1B (Rev. 2650)
| Compiler Driver V6.5-003 (sys) cc Driver
• the platform’s sig_t is incompatible too (simplify check)
• no compile warnings at all
• results in:
$ size mksh
| text data bss dec hex
| 327680 16384 17808 361872 58590
$ file mksh
| mksh: COFF format alpha dynamically linked, demand paged executable or object module not stripped - version 3.13-14
$ ldd mksh
|
| Main => mksh
| libc.so => /usr/shlib/libc.so
$ ls -l mksh
| -rwxr-xr-x 1 mirbsd users 395200 Mar 5 19:18 mksh
• minor testsuite issues:
FAIL ./check.t:regression-13
unexpected stderr - got too much output
wanted nothing
got:
Successful
cat: output error
⇒ probably harmless
• works like a charm!
todo tomorrow:
• test case (compare with e.g. GNU bash)
• manpage
• version bump
sqchar is a bit ugly, but \/ must be preserved, as we don’t get wdencoded
strings later on in the process (eval.c CSUBST) and I didn’t want to have
an implementation like ${foo: 2: 3} this time
this change broke abortion on failure to read input, was not
needed for gcc warnings and is the fault of Intel’s compiler
this should fix the other busy-loop problem occuring only on
GNU/Linux so far – 10x spaetzle@freewrt.o for pointing me to
the problem; reproduced on my work craptop
from netbsd via oksh
we had the NULL pointer deref already fixed
• avoid a bogus not-setting the return value of edit.c:x_file_glob()
introduced by the above change in oksh
• escape ? as well (but not ] because that’s wrong)
reminded by cbiere@netbsd via oksh
• Unsetting a non-existent variable is not an error. See
http://www.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/009695399/utilities/unset.html
report from Arkadiusz Miskiewicz; fixed based on
http://cvs.pld-linux.org diff via oksh but modified slightly
• Be more smart waiting for input for non-interactive scripts. Fix
based on a diff from debian: see their bug#296446 (via oksh)
modified slightly
this also fixes cnuke@’s “mksh busy loop” problem, for which I never
received a bug report, but the Debian bug page contains a set of two
scripts to reproduce this before (and no longer after) this commit
• some KNF
• bump version
In contrast to AT&T ksh93, its semantics are like GNU bash in that it ap-
pends the current working directory to the search path; it is implemented
as a shell alias instead of enhancing funcs.c:shbuiltins[] like in ksh93.
delivered to the process
• regression test by Clint Pachl, verified against Debian ksh93 by me
• place to fix it in the code discovered by Otto Moerbeek
namely Dr. Robert “Pfeffer” Arnold (in this case, in FreeWRT), make
a half-completed attempt at implementing ${foo:2:3} substring evals
(of course, negatives can't work right now and that the numbers are
in face expressions is something I only read later too – this is to
be revisited later, but it's already late)
don't depend on this behaviour yet though
if someone wants to add more regression tests, feel free to…
tg