Use a better name than "dont_kill_application"
signal_debugger seems like a more fitting name
This commit is contained in:
		| @@ -304,14 +304,14 @@ static ResultCode ArbitrateUnlock(VAddr mutex_addr) { | |||||||
| struct BreakReason { | struct BreakReason { | ||||||
|     union { |     union { | ||||||
|         u32 raw; |         u32 raw; | ||||||
|         BitField<31, 1, u32> dont_kill_application; |         BitField<31, 1, u32> signal_debugger; | ||||||
|     }; |     }; | ||||||
| }; | }; | ||||||
|  |  | ||||||
| /// Break program execution | /// Break program execution | ||||||
| static void Break(u32 reason, u64 info1, u64 info2) { | static void Break(u32 reason, u64 info1, u64 info2) { | ||||||
|     BreakReason break_reason{reason}; |     BreakReason break_reason{reason}; | ||||||
|     if (break_reason.dont_kill_application) { |     if (break_reason.signal_debugger) { | ||||||
|         LOG_ERROR( |         LOG_ERROR( | ||||||
|             Debug_Emulated, |             Debug_Emulated, | ||||||
|             "Emulated program broke execution! reason=0x{:016X}, info1=0x{:016X}, info2=0x{:016X}", |             "Emulated program broke execution! reason=0x{:016X}, info1=0x{:016X}, info2=0x{:016X}", | ||||||
|   | |||||||
		Reference in New Issue
	
	Block a user