Add topics, reorg files
This commit is contained in:
parent
b759fa13ae
commit
bc861e20d1
|
@ -46,7 +46,7 @@ This section will be structured as comparisons between how protocols handle thes
|
||||||
- Data models
|
- Data models
|
||||||
- Data availability
|
- Data availability
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
#### Money
|
#### Monetization
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
- Business models
|
- Business models
|
||||||
- Payment
|
- Payment
|
||||||
|
|
|
@ -1,15 +0,0 @@
|
||||||
[Zero-knowledge Proof of Identity paper](https://eprint.iacr.org/2019/546.pdf)
|
|
||||||
"turning X.509 certificates into anonymous credentials."
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
[business level description of zkSNARK](https://medium.com/@SamRadOfficial/why-zk-snarks-are-crucial-for-blockchain-data-privacy-e02f4bc1d352)
|
|
||||||
"zk-SNARK is a form of cryptography that proves possession of certain information without revealing that information, and without any interaction between the prover and verifier."
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
[Introduction to zk-SNARKs with Examples](https://media.consensys.net/introduction-to-zksnarks-with-examples-3283b554fc3b)
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
It looks like the libraries available are still fairly early stage, but the excitement around it should make them move fairly fast
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
Open question - how can this be integrated into a universal-use protocol that may include participants that do not use zkSNARK -
|
|
||||||
can we use it with different levels of uncertainty from different external providers who might identify people in looser ways?
|
|
||||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue