ckyri015
/
iptv
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull Requests Projects Releases Wiki Activity

Update FAQ.md

This commit is contained in:
Diego 2022-08-16 13:02:56 -05:00 committed by GitHub
parent 2159c18d16
commit f3679f6490
No known key found for this signature in database
GPG Key ID: 4AEE18F83AFDEB23
1 changed files with 1 additions and 1 deletions
Show Stats Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

2
FAQ.md
View File

@ -75,7 +75,7 @@ Yes, we need the links to be publicly accessible like FTA packages (free-to-air)
Based on [#480](https://github.com/iptv-org/iptv/issues/480) and [#2732](https://github.com/iptv-org/iptv/issues/2732).
### Can I add a FTA channel that broadcasts PPV events or pay programming?
Maybe. Consider if the country where it is broadcasted allows fair use. Owners can ban the broadcast of PPV events, and even issue a DMCA takedown. Check the [blocklist](https://github.com/iptv-org/database/blob/master/data/blocklist.csv) for more info about specific events, and this [counternotice](https://github.com/github/dmca/blob/3ce1c9402c6b7e46dcbbea6ff866d6a44e75c72a/2020/10/2020-10-08-dfl-counternotice.md) indicating that a DMCA takedown is invalid if only one FTA channel infringes copyright.
Maybe, this may change in future answers. Consider if the country where it is broadcasted allows fair use. Owners can ban the broadcast of PPV events, and even issue a DMCA takedown. Check the [blocklist](https://github.com/iptv-org/database/blob/master/data/blocklist.csv) for more info about specific events, and this [counternotice](https://github.com/github/dmca/blob/3ce1c9402c6b7e46dcbbea6ff866d6a44e75c72a/2020/10/2020-10-08-dfl-counternotice.md) indicating that a DMCA takedown is invalid if only one FTA channel infringes copyright.
Please remember that by sharing a link to a FTA channel (or more), you are **indexing** the link, not **restreaming** its content. This subtility makes most of the DMCA takedowns false and invalid under law.
A good example of this would be [Perfect 10 v. Google](https://www.eff.org/fr/cases/perfect-10-v-google).