bcarrella/cef
1
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://bitbucket.org/chromiumembedded/cef synced 2025-06-05 21:39:12 +02:00
Code Issues Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity

Update to Chromium version 75.0.3770.0 (#652427)

Browse Source
This commit is contained in:
Marshall Greenblatt
2019-06-05 16:15:45 +02:00
parent ab6fd322d1
commit 6193d8c554
79 changed files with 739 additions and 763 deletions
Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

242
patch/patches/base_value_646113.patch
View File

@@ -1,8 +1,8 @@
diff --git base/values.cc base/values.cc
index 6f3a9e2cd8a2..d35972814034 100644
index 03acb86bbc04..b65a6d542987 100644
--- base/values.cc
+++ base/values.cc
@@ -22,20 +22,6 @@
@@ -23,20 +23,6 @@
namespace base {
@@ -20,240 +20,6 @@ index 6f3a9e2cd8a2..d35972814034 100644
- "base::Value should be a standard-layout C++ class in order "
- "to avoid undefined behaviour in its implementation!");
-
namespace {
static_assert(sizeof(Value::DoubleStorage) == sizeof(double),
"The double and DoubleStorage types should have the same size");
const char* const kTypeNames[] = {"null", "boolean", "integer", "double",
@@ -150,15 +136,15 @@ Value::Value(Type type) : type_(type) {
}
Value::Value(bool in_bool)
- : bool_type_(Type::BOOLEAN),
+ : type_(Type::BOOLEAN),
bool_value_(in_bool) {}
Value::Value(int in_int)
- : int_type_(Type::INTEGER),
+ : type_(Type::INTEGER),
int_value_(in_int) {}
Value::Value(double in_double)
- : double_type_(Type::DOUBLE),
+ : type_(Type::DOUBLE),
double_value_(in_double) {
if (!std::isfinite(double_value_)) {
NOTREACHED() << "Non-finite (i.e. NaN or positive/negative infinity) "
@@ -172,7 +158,7 @@ Value::Value(const char* in_string) : Value(std::string(in_string)) {}
Value::Value(StringPiece in_string) : Value(std::string(in_string)) {}
Value::Value(std::string&& in_string) noexcept
- : string_type_(Type::STRING),
+ : type_(Type::STRING),
string_value_(std::move(in_string)) {
DCHECK(IsStringUTF8(string_value_));
}
@@ -182,19 +168,19 @@ Value::Value(const char16* in_string16) : Value(StringPiece16(in_string16)) {}
Value::Value(StringPiece16 in_string16) : Value(UTF16ToUTF8(in_string16)) {}
Value::Value(const std::vector<char>& in_blob)
- : binary_type_(Type::BINARY),
+ : type_(Type::BINARY),
binary_value_(in_blob.begin(), in_blob.end()) {}
Value::Value(base::span<const uint8_t> in_blob)
- : binary_type_(Type::BINARY),
+ : type_(Type::BINARY),
binary_value_(in_blob.begin(), in_blob.end()) {}
Value::Value(BlobStorage&& in_blob) noexcept
- : binary_type_(Type::BINARY),
+ : type_(Type::BINARY),
binary_value_(std::move(in_blob)) {}
Value::Value(const DictStorage& in_dict)
- : dict_type_(Type::DICTIONARY), dict_() {
+ : type_(Type::DICTIONARY), dict_() {
dict_.reserve(in_dict.size());
for (const auto& it : in_dict) {
dict_.try_emplace(dict_.end(), it.first,
@@ -203,17 +189,17 @@ Value::Value(const DictStorage& in_dict)
}
Value::Value(DictStorage&& in_dict) noexcept
- : dict_type_(Type::DICTIONARY),
+ : type_(Type::DICTIONARY),
dict_(std::move(in_dict)) {}
-Value::Value(const ListStorage& in_list) : list_type_(Type::LIST), list_() {
+Value::Value(const ListStorage& in_list) : type_(Type::LIST), list_() {
list_.reserve(in_list.size());
for (const auto& val : in_list)
list_.emplace_back(val.Clone());
}
Value::Value(ListStorage&& in_list) noexcept
- : list_type_(Type::LIST),
+ : type_(Type::LIST),
list_(std::move(in_list)) {}
Value& Value::operator=(Value&& that) noexcept {
diff --git base/values.h base/values.h
index 7bc355ee586d..441967681a4b 100644
--- base/values.h
+++ base/values.h
@@ -390,78 +390,18 @@ class BASE_EXPORT Value {
size_t EstimateMemoryUsage() const;
protected:
- // Technical note:
- // The naive way to implement a tagged union leads to wasted bytes
- // in the object on CPUs like ARM ones, which impose an 8-byte alignment
- // for double values. I.e. if one does something like:
- //
- // struct TaggedValue {
- // int type_; // size = 1, align = 4
- // union {
- // bool bool_value_; // size = 1, align = 1
- // int int_value_; // size = 4, align = 4
- // double double_value_; // size = 8, align = 8
- // std::string string_value_; // size = 12, align = 4 (32-bit)
- // };
- // };
- //
- // The end result is that the union will have an alignment of 8, and a size
- // of 16, due to 4 extra padding bytes following |string_value_| to respect
- // the alignment requirement.
- //
- // As a consequence, the struct TaggedValue will have a size of 24 bytes,
- // due to the size of the union (16), the size of |type_| (4) and 4 bytes
- // of padding between |type_| and the union to respect its alignment.
- //
- // This means 8 bytes of unused memory per instance on 32-bit ARM!
- //
- // To reclaim these, a union of structs is used instead, in order to ensure
- // that |double_value_| below is always located at an offset that is a
- // multiple of 8, relative to the start of the overall data structure.
- //
- // Each struct must declare its own |type_| field, which must have a different
- // name, to appease the C++ compiler.
- //
- // Using this technique sizeof(base::Value) == 16 on 32-bit ARM instead
- // of 24, without losing any information. Results are unchanged for x86,
- // x86_64 and arm64 (16, 32 and 32 bytes respectively).
+ // TODO(crbug.com/646113): Make these private once DictionaryValue and
+ // ListValue are properly inlined.
+ Type type_;
+
union {
- struct {
- // TODO(crbug.com/646113): Make these private once DictionaryValue and
- // ListValue are properly inlined.
- Type type_ : 8;
- };
- struct {
- Type bool_type_ : 8;
- bool bool_value_;
- };
- struct {
- Type int_type_ : 8;
- int int_value_;
- };
- struct {
- Type double_type_ : 8;
- // Subtle: On architectures that require it, the compiler will ensure
- // that |double_value_|'s offset is a multiple of 8 (e.g. 32-bit ARM).
- // See technical note above to understand why it is important.
- double double_value_;
- };
- struct {
- Type string_type_ : 8;
- std::string string_value_;
- };
- struct {
- Type binary_type_ : 8;
- BlobStorage binary_value_;
- };
- struct {
- Type dict_type_ : 8;
- DictStorage dict_;
- };
- struct {
- Type list_type_ : 8;
- ListStorage list_;
- };
+ bool bool_value_;
+ int int_value_;
+ double double_value_;
+ std::string string_value_;
+ BlobStorage binary_value_;
+ DictStorage dict_;
+ ListStorage list_;
};
private:
diff --git base/values_unittest.cc base/values_unittest.cc
index 2907dc066843..3a65e2d6ff2b 100644
--- base/values_unittest.cc
+++ base/values_unittest.cc
@@ -6,7 +6,6 @@
#include <stddef.h>
-#include <algorithm>
#include <functional>
#include <limits>
#include <memory>
@@ -16,7 +15,6 @@
#include <vector>
#include "base/containers/adapters.h"
-#include "base/logging.h"
#include "base/strings/string16.h"
#include "base/strings/string_piece.h"
#include "base/strings/utf_string_conversions.h"
@@ -26,46 +24,6 @@
namespace base {
-// Test is currently incorrect on Windows x86.
-#if !defined(OS_WIN) || !defined(ARCH_CPU_X86)
-TEST(ValuesTest, SizeOfValue) {
- // Ensure that base::Value is as small as possible, i.e. that there is
- // no wasted space after the inner value due to alignment constraints.
- // Distinguish between the 'header' that includes |type_| and and the inner
- // value that follows it, which can be a bool, int, double, string, blob, list
- // or dict.
-#define INNER_TYPES_LIST(X) \
- X(bool, bool_value_) \
- X(int, int_value_) \
- X(double, double_value_) \
- X(std::string, string_value_) \
- X(Value::BlobStorage, binary_value_) \
- X(Value::ListStorage, list_) \
- X(Value::DictStorage, dict_)
-
-#define INNER_STRUCT_LIMIT(type, value) offsetof(Value, value) + sizeof(type),
-
- // Return the maximum size in bytes of each inner struct inside base::Value
- size_t max_inner_struct_limit =
- std::max({INNER_TYPES_LIST(INNER_STRUCT_LIMIT)});
-
- // Ensure that base::Value is not larger than necessary, i.e. that there is
- // no un-necessary padding afte the structs due to alignment constraints of
- // one of the inner fields.
- EXPECT_EQ(max_inner_struct_limit, sizeof(Value));
- if (max_inner_struct_limit != sizeof(Value)) {
- // The following are useful to understand what's wrong when the EXPECT_EQ()
- // above actually fails.
-#define PRINT_INNER_FIELD_INFO(x, y) \
- LOG(INFO) << #y " type=" #x " size=" << sizeof(x) << " align=" << alignof(x);
-
- LOG(INFO) << "Value size=" << sizeof(Value) << " align=" << alignof(Value);
- INNER_TYPES_LIST(PRINT_INNER_FIELD_INFO)
- LOG(INFO) << "max_inner_struct_limit=" << max_inner_struct_limit;
- }
-}
-#endif
-
TEST(ValuesTest, TestNothrow) {
static_assert(std::is_nothrow_move_constructible<Value>::value,
"IsNothrowMoveConstructible");