mirror of
https://bitbucket.org/chromiumembedded/cef
synced 2025-06-05 21:39:12 +02:00
Move message routing from CefBrowser to CefFrame (see issue #2498).
This change moves the SendProcessMessage method from CefBrowser to CefFrame and adds CefBrowser parameters to OnProcessMessageReceived and OnDraggableRegionsChanged. The internal implementation has changed as follows: - Frame IDs are now a 64-bit combination of the 32-bit render_process_id and render_routing_id values that uniquely identify a RenderFrameHost (RFH). - CefFrameHostImpl objects are now managed by CefBrowserInfo with life span tied to RFH expectations. Specifically, a CefFrameHostImpl object representing a sub-frame will be created when a RenderFrame is created in the renderer process and detached when the associated RenderFrame is deleted or the renderer process in which it runs has died. - The CefFrameHostImpl object representing the main frame will always be valid but the underlying RFH (and associated frame ID) may change over time as a result of cross-origin navigations. Despite these changes calling LoadURL on the main frame object in the browser process will always navigate as expected. - Speculative RFHs, which may be created as a result of a cross-origin navigation and discarded if that navigation is not committed, are now handled correctly (e.g. ignored in most cases until they're committed). - It is less likely, but still possible, to receive a CefFrame object with an invalid frame ID (ID < 0). This can happen in cases where a RFH has not yet been created for a sub-frame. For example, when OnBeforeBrowse is called before initiating navigation in a previously nonexisting sub-frame. To test: All tests pass with NetworkService enabled and disabled.
This commit is contained in:
@@ -959,7 +959,6 @@ void InitOnUIThread(
|
||||
web_contents->GetRenderViewHost()->GetProcess()->GetID();
|
||||
|
||||
content::RenderFrameHost* frame = nullptr;
|
||||
bool get_frame_by_route = false;
|
||||
|
||||
if (request.render_frame_id >= 0) {
|
||||
// TODO(network): Are these main frame checks equivalent?
|
||||
@@ -977,11 +976,9 @@ void InitOnUIThread(
|
||||
render_process_id);
|
||||
}
|
||||
if (!frame) {
|
||||
// Use the main frame for the CefBrowserHost, but choose a more
|
||||
// appropriate CefFrame for the route.
|
||||
// Use the main frame for the CefBrowserHost.
|
||||
frame = web_contents->GetMainFrame();
|
||||
DCHECK(frame);
|
||||
get_frame_by_route = true;
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
@@ -992,7 +989,7 @@ void InitOnUIThread(
|
||||
// |frame| may be null for service worker requests.
|
||||
if (frame) {
|
||||
#if DCHECK_IS_ON()
|
||||
if (frame_tree_node_id >= 0 && !get_frame_by_route) {
|
||||
if (frame_tree_node_id >= 0) {
|
||||
// Sanity check that we ended up with the expected frame.
|
||||
DCHECK_EQ(frame_tree_node_id, frame->GetFrameTreeNodeId());
|
||||
}
|
||||
@@ -1000,15 +997,9 @@ void InitOnUIThread(
|
||||
|
||||
browserPtr = CefBrowserHostImpl::GetBrowserForHost(frame);
|
||||
if (browserPtr) {
|
||||
if (get_frame_by_route) {
|
||||
framePtr =
|
||||
browserPtr->GetFrameForHostRoutingId(request.render_frame_id);
|
||||
frame_tree_node_id = -1;
|
||||
} else {
|
||||
framePtr = browserPtr->GetFrameForHost(frame);
|
||||
if (frame_tree_node_id < 0)
|
||||
frame_tree_node_id = frame->GetFrameTreeNodeId();
|
||||
}
|
||||
framePtr = browserPtr->GetFrameForHost(frame);
|
||||
if (frame_tree_node_id < 0)
|
||||
frame_tree_node_id = frame->GetFrameTreeNodeId();
|
||||
DCHECK(framePtr);
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
Reference in New Issue
Block a user