From 5a4c4908c7b192ee5564e139b3136431147ce877 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Nik Clayton Date: Tue, 23 Jan 2024 16:02:17 +0100 Subject: [PATCH] docs: Correct grammar in conventional commits ADR (#375) --- docs/decisions/0001-use-conventional-commits.md | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/docs/decisions/0001-use-conventional-commits.md b/docs/decisions/0001-use-conventional-commits.md index c747c7f8f..ac3d21757 100644 --- a/docs/decisions/0001-use-conventional-commits.md +++ b/docs/decisions/0001-use-conventional-commits.md @@ -65,4 +65,4 @@ Keep the status quo. * Good, because contributors do not need to do anything different * Bad, because contributors and reviewers can have different expectations of what is reasonable to include in a PR description, causing friction at review time -* Bad, because it keeps the burden on the person responsible for maintaining release notes and changelogs is still high +* Bad, because it keeps the burden on the person responsible for maintaining release notes and changelogs, which remains high