commit 588a5e1dde added a non-reentrant
call to nano_malloc which causes a build failure if INTERNAL_NEWLIB is
defined.
Here is a snippet of the error:
In file included from .../newlib/newlib/libc/stdlib/nano-mallocr.c:38:
.../newlib/newlib/libc/include/malloc.h:42:25: note: expected 'struct _reent *' but argument is of type 'ptrdiff_t' {aka 'int'}
42 | extern void *_malloc_r (struct _reent *, size_t);
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
.../newlib/newlib/libc/stdlib/nano-mallocr.c:67:22: error: too few arguments to function '_malloc_r'
67 | #define nano_malloc _malloc_r
| ^~~~~~~~~
.../newlib/newlib/libc/stdlib/nano-mallocr.c:456:11: note: in expansion of macro 'nano_malloc'
456 | mem = nano_malloc(bytes);
| ^~~~~~~~~~~
In file included from .../newlib/newlib/libc/stdlib/nano-mallocr.c:38:
.../newlib/newlib/libc/include/malloc.h:42:14: note: declared here
42 | extern void *_malloc_r (struct _reent *, size_t);
| ^~~~~~~~~
.../newlib/newlib/libc/stdlib/nano-mallocr.c:43: warning: "assert" redefined
43 | #define assert(x) ((void)0)
|
This patch adds a missing RCALL to the args when calling nano_malloc
from nano_calloc, so that if the call is reentrant, reent_ptr is passed
as the first argument.
The variable `bytes` (also added in 588a5e1d) has been changed from a
`ptrdiff_t` to `malloc_size_t` as it does not need to be signed. It is
used to store the product of two unsigned malloc_size_t variables and
then iff there was no overflow is it passed to malloc and memset which
both expect size_t which is unsigned.
Signed-off-by: Craig Blackmore <craig.blackmore@embecosm.com>
ab215e3dd1