From d32ca893ac1ffc7366c3d8f04007d4741c7377cf Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: DJ Delorie <dj@redhat.com>
Date: Mon, 7 Aug 2000 15:02:09 +0000
Subject: [PATCH] * configure.in (FLAGS_FOR_TARGET): invert test for xgcc,
should mean "if we're also building gcc, and it's a gcc that will run on the
build machine, we want to use its includes instead of the system's default
includes".
---
ChangeLog | 7 +++++++
configure.in | 2 +-
2 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/ChangeLog b/ChangeLog
index 81415dcfd..29b31e3a6 100644
--- a/ChangeLog
+++ b/ChangeLog
@@ -1,3 +1,10 @@
+2000-08-07 DJ Delorie <dj@redhat.com>
+
+ * configure.in (FLAGS_FOR_TARGET): invert test for xgcc, should mean
+ "if we're also building gcc, and it's a gcc that will run on the
+ build machine, we want to use its includes instead of the system's
+ default includes".
+
2000-08-03 Alexandre Oliva <aoliva@redhat.com>
* configure.in (libstdcxx_flags): Don't use `"'.
diff --git a/configure.in b/configure.in
index eed073df2..49f81741e 100644
--- a/configure.in
+++ b/configure.in
@@ -1240,7 +1240,7 @@ case " $skipdirs " in
# If we're using a pre-built compiler (which is the case for
# Canadian crosses or when gcc isn't being built), don't discard
# standard headers.
- if test "${build}" = "${host}" && test ! -d ${topsrcdir}/gcc; then
+ if test "${build}" = "${host}" && test -d ${topsrcdir}/gcc; then
FLAGS_FOR_TARGET=$FLAGS_FOR_TARGET' -nostdinc'
fi