Prefix consistenly target-independent locks with __
Hi, With the patch to allow newlib's locking routine to be retargeted currently under discussion, we need to start thinking of locks as part of newlib's ABI since newlib depends on specific names being provided by the OS. This patch renames 2 locks so that they follow the same naming convention as other locks. It needs to be applied before the retargeting patch, while locks are still an internal consideration. Newlib builds successfully with this change. Ok for master branch? Best regards, Thomas
This commit is contained in:
parent
dfbc941f7e
commit
cd1b883526
@ -71,7 +71,7 @@ static long dd_loccnt = 1; /* Index of entry for sequential readdir's */
|
||||
static struct ddloc *dd_hash[NDIRHASH]; /* Hash list heads for ddlocs */
|
||||
|
||||
#ifdef HAVE_DD_LOCK
|
||||
__LOCK_INIT(static, dd_hash_lock);
|
||||
__LOCK_INIT(static, __dd_hash_lock);
|
||||
#endif
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
@ -92,7 +92,7 @@ _DEFUN(telldir, (dirp),
|
||||
|
||||
#ifdef HAVE_DD_LOCK
|
||||
__lock_acquire_recursive(dirp->dd_lock);
|
||||
__lock_acquire(dd_hash_lock);
|
||||
__lock_acquire(__dd_hash_lock);
|
||||
#endif
|
||||
index = dd_loccnt++;
|
||||
lp->loc_index = index;
|
||||
@ -102,7 +102,7 @@ _DEFUN(telldir, (dirp),
|
||||
lp->loc_next = dd_hash[LOCHASH(index)];
|
||||
dd_hash[LOCHASH(index)] = lp;
|
||||
#ifdef HAVE_DD_LOCK
|
||||
__lock_release(dd_hash_lock);
|
||||
__lock_release(__dd_hash_lock);
|
||||
__lock_release_recursive(dirp->dd_lock);
|
||||
#endif
|
||||
return (index);
|
||||
@ -124,7 +124,7 @@ _DEFUN(_seekdir, (dirp, loc),
|
||||
struct dirent *dp;
|
||||
|
||||
#ifdef HAVE_DD_LOCK
|
||||
__lock_acquire(dd_hash_lock);
|
||||
__lock_acquire(__dd_hash_lock);
|
||||
#endif
|
||||
if (loc != 0) {
|
||||
prevlp = &dd_hash[LOCHASH(loc)];
|
||||
@ -137,7 +137,7 @@ _DEFUN(_seekdir, (dirp, loc),
|
||||
}
|
||||
if (lp == NULL) {
|
||||
#ifdef HAVE_DD_LOCK
|
||||
__lock_release(dd_hash_lock);
|
||||
__lock_release(__dd_hash_lock);
|
||||
#endif
|
||||
return;
|
||||
}
|
||||
@ -163,7 +163,7 @@ found:
|
||||
dirp->dd_loc = 0;
|
||||
}
|
||||
#ifdef HAVE_DD_LOCK
|
||||
__lock_release(dd_hash_lock);
|
||||
__lock_release(__dd_hash_lock);
|
||||
#endif
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
@ -175,7 +175,7 @@ _DEFUN(_cleanupdir, (dirp),
|
||||
int i;
|
||||
|
||||
#ifdef HAVE_DD_LOCK
|
||||
__lock_acquire(dd_hash_lock);
|
||||
__lock_acquire(__dd_hash_lock);
|
||||
#endif
|
||||
for (i = 0; i < NDIRHASH; ++i) {
|
||||
struct ddloc head;
|
||||
@ -200,7 +200,7 @@ _DEFUN(_cleanupdir, (dirp),
|
||||
dd_hash[i] = head.loc_next;
|
||||
}
|
||||
#ifdef HAVE_DD_LOCK
|
||||
__lock_release(dd_hash_lock);
|
||||
__lock_release(__dd_hash_lock);
|
||||
#endif
|
||||
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
@ -44,7 +44,7 @@ struct quick_exit_handler {
|
||||
/**
|
||||
* Lock protecting the handlers list.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
__LOCK_INIT(static, atexit_mutex);
|
||||
__LOCK_INIT(static, __atexit_mutex);
|
||||
/**
|
||||
* Stack of cleanup handlers. These will be invoked in reverse order when
|
||||
*/
|
||||
@ -60,10 +60,10 @@ at_quick_exit(void (*func)(void))
|
||||
if (NULL == h)
|
||||
return (1);
|
||||
h->cleanup = func;
|
||||
__lock_acquire(atexit_mutex);
|
||||
__lock_acquire(__atexit_mutex);
|
||||
h->next = handlers;
|
||||
handlers = h;
|
||||
__lock_release(atexit_mutex);
|
||||
__lock_release(__atexit_mutex);
|
||||
return (0);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
|
Loading…
x
Reference in New Issue
Block a user