Don't call double rint from float powf.
Updated patch to use 0.0f in addition to calling rintf. Tested same way as before, with a testcase that triggers the code and make check. OK? newlib/ * libm/math/wf_pow.c (powf): Call rintf instead of rint. Use 0.0f for compare.
This commit is contained in:
		
				
					committed by
					
						 Corinna Vinschen
						Corinna Vinschen
					
				
			
			
				
	
			
			
			
						parent
						
							efce18d754
						
					
				
				
					commit
					c338bc2255
				
			| @@ -127,11 +127,11 @@ | ||||
| 		    if (_LIB_VERSION == _SVID_) { | ||||
| 		       exc.retval = HUGE; | ||||
| 		       y *= 0.5; | ||||
| 		       if(x<0.0&&rint(y)!=y) exc.retval = -HUGE; | ||||
| 		       if(x<0.0f&&rintf(y)!=y) exc.retval = -HUGE; | ||||
| 		    } else { | ||||
| 		       exc.retval = HUGE_VAL; | ||||
|                        y *= 0.5; | ||||
| 		       if(x<0.0&&rint(y)!=y) exc.retval = -HUGE_VAL; | ||||
| 		       if(x<0.0f&&rintf(y)!=y) exc.retval = -HUGE_VAL; | ||||
| 		    } | ||||
| 		    if (_LIB_VERSION == _POSIX_) | ||||
| 		        errno = ERANGE; | ||||
|   | ||||
		Reference in New Issue
	
	Block a user