From b920561fe3ec2128e783096e0c30fecb7ccb075d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Yaakov Selkowitz Date: Tue, 23 Jan 2018 21:53:04 -0600 Subject: [PATCH] ssp: do not use __ssp_protected_ symbol prefixes This is a NetBSD-specific detail which does not apply to Newlib, causing linking issues in certain scenarios: https://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin/2018-01/msg00189.html Signed-off-by: Yaakov Selkowitz --- newlib/libc/include/ssp/ssp.h | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/newlib/libc/include/ssp/ssp.h b/newlib/libc/include/ssp/ssp.h index 5c65cf4b2..922908659 100644 --- a/newlib/libc/include/ssp/ssp.h +++ b/newlib/libc/include/ssp/ssp.h @@ -51,7 +51,6 @@ __chk_fail() #define __ssp_decl(rtype, fun, args) \ rtype __ssp_real_(fun) args __asm__(__ASMNAME(#fun)); \ -__ssp_inline rtype fun args __asm__(__ASMNAME("__ssp_protected_" #fun)); \ __ssp_inline rtype fun args #define __ssp_redirect_raw(rtype, fun, args, call, cond, bos) \ __ssp_decl(rtype, fun, args) \