Fix C++ includability of crypto headers with static array sizes
C99 allows array function parameters to use the static keyword for their sizes. This tells the compiler that the parameter will have at least the specified size, and calling code will fail to compile if that guarantee is not met. However, this syntax is not legal in C++. This commit reverts r300824, which worked around the problem for sys/md5.h only, and introduces a new macro: min_size(). min_size(x) can be used in headers as a static array size, but will still compile in C++ mode. Reviewed by: cem, ed MFC after: 4 weeks Sponsored by: Spectra Logic Corp Differential Revision: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D8277 fix a typo in __STDC_VERSION__ in __min_size requirements MFC after: 1 week Sponsored by: Panzura
This commit is contained in:
parent
e0dabc0e8d
commit
84a6dba57e
|
@ -361,6 +361,20 @@
|
||||||
__builtin_types_compatible_p(__typeof(expr), t), yes, no)
|
__builtin_types_compatible_p(__typeof(expr), t), yes, no)
|
||||||
#endif
|
#endif
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
/*
|
||||||
|
* C99 Static array indices in function parameter declarations. Syntax such as:
|
||||||
|
* void bar(int myArray[static 10]);
|
||||||
|
* is allowed in C99 but not in C++. Define __min_size appropriately so
|
||||||
|
* headers using it can be compiled in either language. Use like this:
|
||||||
|
* void bar(int myArray[__min_size(10)]);
|
||||||
|
*/
|
||||||
|
#if !defined(__cplusplus) && \
|
||||||
|
(!defined(__STDC_VERSION__) || (__STDC_VERSION__ >= 199901))
|
||||||
|
#define __min_size(x) static (x)
|
||||||
|
#else
|
||||||
|
#define __min_size(x) (x)
|
||||||
|
#endif
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
#if __GNUC_PREREQ__(2, 96)
|
#if __GNUC_PREREQ__(2, 96)
|
||||||
#define __malloc_like __attribute__((__malloc__))
|
#define __malloc_like __attribute__((__malloc__))
|
||||||
#define __pure __attribute__((__pure__))
|
#define __pure __attribute__((__pure__))
|
||||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue