Switching the Cygwin DLL to LGPLv3+, dropping commercial buyout option
Bump GPLv2+ to GPLv3+ for some files, clarify BSD 2-clause. Everything else stays under GPLv3+. New Linking Exception exempts resulting executables from LGPLv3 section 4. Add CONTRIBUTORS file to keep track of licensing. Remove 'Copyright Red Hat Inc' comments. Signed-off-by: Corinna Vinschen <corinna@vinschen.de>
This commit is contained in:
@@ -572,13 +572,15 @@ contributing it for others to use)
|
||||
Can I bundle Cygwin with my product for free?
|
||||
</para></question>
|
||||
<answer><para>
|
||||
Only if you comply with Cygwin's <ulink
|
||||
url="https://cygwin.com/licensing.html">license</ulink> very carefully. If you
|
||||
choose to distribute cygwin1.dll, you must be willing to distribute the
|
||||
exact source code used to build that copy of cygwin1.dll as per the
|
||||
terms of the GPL. If you ship applications that link with cygwin1.dll,
|
||||
you must either provide those applications' source code under a
|
||||
GPL-compatible license, *or* purchase a cygwin license from Red Hat.
|
||||
Starting with Cygwin version 2.5.2, which is LGPL licensed, yes, albeit
|
||||
it's not recommended for interoperability reasons.</para>
|
||||
|
||||
<para>Cygwin versions prior to 2.5.2 were GPL licensed.
|
||||
If you choose to distribute an older cygwin1.dll, you must be willing to
|
||||
distribute the exact source code used to build that copy of cygwin1.dll
|
||||
as per the terms of the GPL. If you ship applications that link with
|
||||
older cygwin1.dll, you must provide those applications' source code
|
||||
under a GPL-compatible license.
|
||||
</para></answer></qandaentry>
|
||||
|
||||
<qandaentry id="faq.using.older-cygwin-conflict">
|
||||
|
Reference in New Issue
Block a user