2011-04-02 Jon TURNEY <jon.turney@dronecode.org.uk>
* thread.cc (semaphore::init): We cannot reliably infer anything from the existing contents of sem, so merely warn rather than return EBUSY if it looks like we are reinitialising a semaphore.
This commit is contained in:
parent
ed240047f2
commit
11629685f1
|
@ -1,3 +1,9 @@
|
|||
2011-04-02 Jon TURNEY <jon.turney@dronecode.org.uk>
|
||||
|
||||
* thread.cc (semaphore::init): We cannot reliably infer anything from
|
||||
the existing contents of sem, so merely warn rather than return EBUSY
|
||||
if it looks like we are reinitialising a semaphore.
|
||||
|
||||
2011-04-19 Corinna Vinschen <corinna@vinschen.de>
|
||||
|
||||
* autoload.cc (GetConsoleWindow): Drop.
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -3209,11 +3209,14 @@ semaphore::_terminate ()
|
|||
int
|
||||
semaphore::init (sem_t *sem, int pshared, unsigned int value)
|
||||
{
|
||||
/* opengroup calls this undefined */
|
||||
/*
|
||||
We can't tell the difference between reinitialising an
|
||||
existing semaphore and initialising a semaphore who's
|
||||
contents happen to be a valid pointer
|
||||
*/
|
||||
if (is_good_object (sem))
|
||||
{
|
||||
set_errno(EBUSY);
|
||||
return -1;
|
||||
paranoid_printf ("potential attempt to reinitialise a semaphore");
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
if (value > SEM_VALUE_MAX)
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue