2000-09-13 17:13:17 +02:00
|
|
|
@section Cygwin API Questions
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
@subsection How does everything work?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
There's a C library which provides a Unix-style API. The
|
|
|
|
applications are linked with it and voila - they run on Windows.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The aim is to add all the goop necessary to make your apps run on
|
|
|
|
Windows into the C library. Then your apps should run on Unix and
|
|
|
|
Windows with no changes at the source level.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The C library is in a DLL, which makes basic applications quite small.
|
|
|
|
And it allows relatively easy upgrades to the Win32/Unix translation
|
|
|
|
layer, providing that dll changes stay backward-compatible.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For a good overview of Cygwin, you may want to read the paper on Cygwin
|
|
|
|
published by the Usenix Association in conjunction with the 2d Usenix NT
|
|
|
|
Symposium in August 1998. It is available in html format on the project
|
|
|
|
WWW site.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
@subsection Are development snapshots for the Cygwin library available?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Yes. They're made whenever anything interesting happens inside the
|
|
|
|
Cygwin library (usually roughly on a nightly basis, depending on how much
|
|
|
|
is going on). They are only intended for those people who wish to
|
|
|
|
contribute code to the project. If you aren't going to be happy
|
|
|
|
debugging problems in a buggy snapshot, avoid these and wait for a real
|
|
|
|
release. The snapshots are available from
|
2000-11-20 15:37:37 +01:00
|
|
|
http://cygwin.com/snapshots/
|
2000-09-13 17:13:17 +02:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
@subsection How is the DOS/Unix CR/LF thing handled?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
@strong{(Please note: This section has not yet been updated for the latest
|
|
|
|
net release.)}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Let's start with some background.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In UNIX, a file is a file and what the file contains is whatever the
|
|
|
|
program/programmer/user told it to put into it. In Windows, a file is
|
|
|
|
also a file and what the file contains depends not only on the
|
|
|
|
program/programmer/user but also the file processing mode.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
When processing in text mode, certain values of data are treated
|
|
|
|
specially. A \n (new line) written to the file will prepend a \r
|
|
|
|
(carriage return) so that if you `printf("Hello\n") you in fact get
|
|
|
|
"Hello\r\n". Upon reading this combination, the \r is removed and the
|
|
|
|
number of bytes returned by the read is 1 less than was actually read.
|
|
|
|
This tends to confuse programs dependant on ftell() and fseek(). A
|
|
|
|
Ctrl-Z encountered while reading a file sets the End Of File flags even
|
|
|
|
though it truly isn't the end of file.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
One of Cygwin's goals is to make it possible to easily mix Cygwin-ported
|
|
|
|
Unix programs with generic Windows programs. As a result, Cygwin opens
|
|
|
|
files in text mode as is normal under Windows. In the accompanying
|
|
|
|
tools, tools that deal with binaries (e.g. objdump) operate in unix
|
|
|
|
binary mode and tools that deal with text files (e.g. bash) operate in
|
|
|
|
text mode.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Some people push the notion of globally setting the default processing
|
|
|
|
mode to binary via mount point options or by setting the CYGWIN32
|
|
|
|
environment variable. But that creates a different problem. In
|
|
|
|
binary mode, the program receives all of the data in the file, including
|
|
|
|
a \r. Since the programs will no longer deal with these properly for
|
|
|
|
you, you would have to remove the \r from the relevant text files,
|
|
|
|
especially scripts and startup resource files. This is a porter "cop
|
|
|
|
out", forcing the user to deal with the \r for the porter.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
It is rather easy for the porter to fix the source code by supplying the
|
|
|
|
appropriate file processing mode switches to the open/fopen functions.
|
|
|
|
Treat all text files as text and treat all binary files as binary.
|
|
|
|
To be specific, you can select binary mode by adding @code{O_BINARY} to
|
|
|
|
the second argument of an @code{open} call, or @code{"b"} to second
|
|
|
|
argument of an @code{fopen} call. You can also call @code{setmode (fd,
|
|
|
|
O_BINARY)}.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Note that because the open/fopen switches are defined by ANSI, they
|
|
|
|
exist under most flavors of Unix; open/fopen will just ignore the switch
|
|
|
|
since they have no meaning to UNIX.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Also note that @code{lseek} only works in binary mode.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Explanation adapted from mailing list email by Earnie Boyd
|
|
|
|
<earnie_boyd@@yahoo.com>.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
@subsection Is the Cygwin library multi-thread-safe?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Multi-thread-safe support is turned on by default in 1.1.x releases
|
|
|
|
(i.e., in the latest net release). That does not mean that it is bug
|
|
|
|
free!
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
There is also limited support for 'POSIX threads', see the file
|
|
|
|
@code{cygwin.din} for the list of POSIX thread functions provided.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
@subsection Why is some functionality only supported in Windows NT?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Windows 9x: n.
|
|
|
|
32 bit extensions and a graphical shell for a 16 bit patch to an
|
|
|
|
8 bit operating system originally coded for a 4 bit microprocessor,
|
|
|
|
written by a 2 bit company that can't stand 1 bit of competition.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
But seriously, Windows 9x lacks most of the security-related calls and
|
|
|
|
has several other deficiencies with respect to its version of the Win32
|
|
|
|
API. See the calls.texinfo document for more information as to what
|
|
|
|
is not supported in Win 9x.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
@subsection How is fork() implemented?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cygwin fork() essentially works like a non-copy on write version
|
|
|
|
of fork() (like old Unix versions used to do). Because of this it
|
|
|
|
can be a little slow. In most cases, you are better off using the
|
|
|
|
spawn family of calls if possible.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Here's how it works:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Parent initializes a space in the Cygwin process table for child.
|
|
|
|
Parent creates child suspended using Win32 CreateProcess call, giving
|
|
|
|
the same path it was invoked with itself. Parent calls setjmp to save
|
|
|
|
its own context and then sets a pointer to this in the Cygwin shared
|
|
|
|
memory area (shared among all Cygwin tasks). Parent fills in the childs
|
|
|
|
.data and .bss subsections by copying from its own address space into
|
|
|
|
the suspended child's address space. Parent then starts the child.
|
|
|
|
Parent waits on mutex for child to get to safe point. Child starts and
|
|
|
|
discovers if has been forked and then longjumps using the saved jump
|
|
|
|
buffer. Child sets mutex parent is waiting on and then blocks on
|
|
|
|
another mutex waiting for parent to fill in its stack and heap. Parent
|
|
|
|
notices child is in safe area, copies stack and heap from itself into
|
|
|
|
child, releases the mutex the child is waiting on and returns from the
|
|
|
|
fork call. Child wakes from blocking on mutex, recreates any mmapped
|
|
|
|
areas passed to it via shared area and then returns from fork itself.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
@subsection How does wildcarding (globbing) work?
|
|
|
|
|
2000-12-13 16:43:32 +01:00
|
|
|
If the DLL thinks it was invoked from a DOS style prompt, it runs a
|
2000-09-13 17:13:17 +02:00
|
|
|
`globber' over the arguments provided on the command line. This means
|
|
|
|
that if you type @code{LS *.EXE} from DOS, it will do what you might
|
|
|
|
expect.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Beware: globbing uses @code{malloc}. If your application defines
|
|
|
|
@code{malloc}, that will get used. This may do horrible things to you.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
@subsection How do symbolic links work?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cygwin generates link files with a magic header. When
|
|
|
|
you open a file or directory that is a link to somewhere else, it
|
|
|
|
opens the file or directory listed in the magic header. Because we
|
|
|
|
don't want to have to open every referenced file to check symlink
|
|
|
|
status, Cygwin marks symlinks with the system attribute. Files
|
|
|
|
without the system attribute are not checked. Because remote samba
|
|
|
|
filesystems do not enable the system attribute by default, symlinks do
|
|
|
|
not work on network drives unless you explicitly enable this
|
|
|
|
attribute.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
@subsection Why do some files, which are not executables have the 'x' type.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
When working out the unix-style attribute bits on a file, the library
|
|
|
|
has to fill out some information not provided by the WIN32 API.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
It guesses that files ending in .exe and .bat are executable, as are
|
|
|
|
ones which have a "#!" as their first characters.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
@subsection How secure is Cygwin in a multi-user environment?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cygwin is not secure in a multi-user environment. For
|
|
|
|
example if you have a long running daemon such as "inetd"
|
|
|
|
running as admin while ordinary users are logged in, or if
|
|
|
|
you have a user logged in remotely while another user is logged
|
|
|
|
into the console, one cygwin client can trick another into
|
|
|
|
running code for it. In this way one user may gain the
|
|
|
|
priveledge of another cygwin program running on the machine.
|
|
|
|
This is because cygwin has shared state that is accessible by
|
|
|
|
all processes.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Thanks to Tim Newsham (newsham@@lava.net) for this explanation).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
@subsection How do the net-related functions work?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
@strong{(Please note: This section has not yet been updated for the latest
|
|
|
|
net release.)}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The network support in Cygwin is supposed to provide the Unix API, not
|
|
|
|
the Winsock API.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
There are differences between the semantics of functions with the same
|
|
|
|
name under the API.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
E.g., the select system call on Unix can wait on a standard file handles
|
|
|
|
and handles to sockets. The select call in winsock can only wait on
|
|
|
|
sockets. Because of this, cygwin.dll does a lot of nasty stuff behind
|
|
|
|
the scenes, trying to persuade various winsock/win32 functions to do what
|
|
|
|
a Unix select would do.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
If you are porting an application which already uses Winsock, then
|
|
|
|
using the net support in Cygwin is wrong.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
But you can still use native Winsock, and use Cygwin. The functions
|
|
|
|
which cygwin.dll exports are called 'cygwin_<name>'. There
|
|
|
|
are a load of defines which map the standard Unix names to the names
|
|
|
|
exported by the dll -- check out include/netdb.h:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
@example
|
|
|
|
..etc..
|
|
|
|
void cygwin_setprotoent (int);
|
|
|
|
void cygwin_setservent (int);
|
|
|
|
void cygwin_setrpcent (int);
|
|
|
|
..etc..
|
|
|
|
#ifndef __INSIDE_CYGWIN_NET__
|
|
|
|
#define endprotoent cygwin_endprotoent
|
|
|
|
#define endservent cygwin_endservent
|
|
|
|
#define endrpcent cygwin_endrpcent
|
|
|
|
..etc..
|
|
|
|
@end example
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The idea is that you'll get the Unix->Cygwin mapping if you include
|
|
|
|
the standard Unix header files. If you use this, you won't need to
|
|
|
|
link with libwinsock.a - all the net stuff is inside the dll.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The mywinsock.h file is a standard winsock.h which has been hacked to
|
|
|
|
remove the bits which conflict with the standard Unix API, or are
|
|
|
|
defined in other headers. E.g., in mywinsock.h, the definition of
|
|
|
|
struct hostent is removed. This is because on a Unix box, it lives in
|
|
|
|
netdb. It isn't a good idea to use it in your applications.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of the b19 release, this information may be slightly out of date.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
@subsection I don't want Unix sockets, how do I use normal Win32 winsock?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
@strong{(Please note: This section has not yet been updated for the latest
|
|
|
|
net release.)}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
To use the vanilla Win32 winsock, you just need to #define Win32_Winsock
|
|
|
|
and #include "windows.h" at the top of your source file(s). You'll also
|
|
|
|
want to add -lwsock32 to the compiler's command line so you link against
|
|
|
|
libwsock32.a.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
@subsection What version numbers are associated with Cygwin?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
@strong{(Please note: This section has not yet been updated for the latest
|
|
|
|
net release.)}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
There is a cygwin.dll major version number that gets incremented
|
|
|
|
every time we make a new Cygwin release available. This
|
|
|
|
corresponds to the name of the release (e.g. beta 19's major
|
|
|
|
number is "19"). There is also a cygwin.dll minor version number. If
|
|
|
|
we release an update of the library for an existing release, the minor
|
|
|
|
number would be incremented.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
There are also Cygwin API major and minor numbers. The major number
|
|
|
|
tracks important non-backward-compatible interface changes to the API.
|
|
|
|
An executable linked with an earlier major number will not be compatible
|
|
|
|
with the latest DLL. The minor number tracks significant API additions
|
|
|
|
or changes that will not break older executables but may be required by
|
|
|
|
newly compiled ones.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Then there is a shared memory region compatibity version number. It is
|
|
|
|
incremented when incompatible changes are made to the shared memory
|
|
|
|
region or to any named shared mutexes, semaphores, etc.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Finally there is a mount point registry version number which keeps track
|
|
|
|
of non-backwards-compatible changes to the registry mount table layout.
|
|
|
|
This has been "B15.0" since the beta 15 release.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
@subsection Why isn't _timezone set correctly?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
@strong{(Please note: This section has not yet been updated for the latest
|
|
|
|
net release.)}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Did you explicitly call tzset() before checking the value of _timezone?
|
|
|
|
If not, you must do so.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
@subsection Is there a mouse interface?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
There is no way to capture mouse events from Cygwin. There are
|
|
|
|
currently no plans to add support for this.
|
|
|
|
|