35 lines
1.5 KiB
Plaintext
35 lines
1.5 KiB
Plaintext
|
How does vfork work?
|
||
|
|
||
|
When a program calls vfork, cygwin attempts to short circuit its
|
||
|
normal, expensive fork mechanism.
|
||
|
|
||
|
Vfork is mainly smoke and mirrors. A call to vfork contines to execute
|
||
|
in the current process but first it returns a pid of 0 so that process
|
||
|
will execute code intended for the child in a UNIX system. Before
|
||
|
returning the zero, vfork makes a copy of the current fd table so that
|
||
|
closing an fd in the "child" will not affect the "parent".
|
||
|
|
||
|
Some of this info is stored in a per-thread structure but vfork is not
|
||
|
really thread-safe since it also stores the fd "backup" table in the
|
||
|
global fd table.
|
||
|
|
||
|
The process continues to execute until it hits some type of exec call.
|
||
|
The exec call is essentially translated into a spawn NO_WAIT call and
|
||
|
the new process is started via this mechanism. After execing, the
|
||
|
"child" process no longer should exist, so the spawn code longjmps back
|
||
|
to the original vfork call. The previously opened fds are closed and
|
||
|
the parent's fd table is restored. vfork() then returns the pid of the
|
||
|
just-spawned process.
|
||
|
|
||
|
Meanwhile, the just-spawned child notices that it has been spawned as
|
||
|
the result of a vfork and closes the extra file handles.
|
||
|
|
||
|
This all relies on the fact that the child in a vfork call can affect
|
||
|
just about everything in the parent except for the parent's fds.
|
||
|
The assumption is that you don't return from the call that invoked the
|
||
|
vfork.
|
||
|
|
||
|
The assumption is also that all of this is much faster than the
|
||
|
slow method that cygwin uses to implement fork().
|
||
|
|