From e41144273a943c183f7a9478c343dc062584eed6 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Davide Gualano Date: Mon, 29 Apr 2019 09:58:37 +0200 Subject: [PATCH] Add missing word --- Technotes/AvoidFeedParsing.markdown | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/Technotes/AvoidFeedParsing.markdown b/Technotes/AvoidFeedParsing.markdown index bcbc80882..be62fdf36 100644 --- a/Technotes/AvoidFeedParsing.markdown +++ b/Technotes/AvoidFeedParsing.markdown @@ -30,10 +30,10 @@ NetNewsWire also looks at the content of the feed. If it’s definitely an image Yes, this kind of thing happens in the real world: I’ve seen it. (Once I even saw a feed URL return a movie file.) -We could more here, but it’s not often an issue, so it’s not a high priority. Just a good-to-have. +We could do more here, but it’s not often an issue, so it’s not a high priority. Just a good-to-have. ## Thing It Never Does Feeds sometimes contain dates for modification times. NetNewsWire doesn’t trust these at all. In-feed dates are *never* used for making any decisions about parsing or not. -When an article has a modification date, that date is stored in the database. But it’s there only in case it should be shown to the user. (Sometimes articles in a feed have a modification date but not a publication date — why oh why? — and in that case we display the modification date.) \ No newline at end of file +When an article has a modification date, that date is stored in the database. But it’s there only in case it should be shown to the user. (Sometimes articles in a feed have a modification date but not a publication date — why oh why? — and in that case we display the modification date.)