Sponsored by:
+ +++ +Pundits have long suspected that two roadblocks stood in the way +of Apple becoming a carrier: the infrastructure is incredibly +expensive, even if you lease it from the larger carriers, and +Apple could limit the iPhone business if it were to compete with +the major carriers.
+ +But Apple has sidestepped those concerns by essentially taking +over a carrier (actually a carrier-owned MVNO — Mobile Virtual +Network Operator) without acquiring it. Apple may not own Virgin +Mobile, but Virgin Mobile is now utterly dependent on Apple and +will benefit through promotion in Apple Stores.
+ +We shouldn’t read too much into this deal, but at the very least +it’s unusual to see a company like Virgin Mobile going all-in on +the iPhone. And it might point toward Apple dipping its toe into +the MVNO business.
+
Virgin Mobile is owned by Sprint (and thus uses Sprint’s back-end), and in my experience Sprint is the worst of the U.S. carriers, so this is not a panacea. But it is intriguing.
+ +I’ve been using the developer betas on my 10.5-inch iPad Pro review unit and a spare iPhone. I’m willing to wait to install iOS 11 on my primary iPhone, but at this point, bugs be damned, I wouldn’t want to use an iPad running iOS 10.3. It’s stable enough, and the benefits of the great new features for iPad far outweigh the downsides of the beta (which, in addition to crashing bugs, include questionable battery life).
+ +++ +It has this wild new feature called Drop In. Drop In lets you give +people permission to automatically connect with your device. +Here’s how it works. Let’s say my father has activated Drop In for +me on his Echo Show. All I have to do is say, “Alexa, drop in on +Dad.” It then turns on the microphone and camera on my father’s +device and starts broadcasting that to me. For the several seconds +of the call, my father’s video screen would appear fogged over. +But then there he’ll be. And to be clear: This happens even if he +doesn’t answer. Unless he declines the call, audibly or by tapping +on the screen, it goes through. It just starts. Hello, you look +nice today.
+ +Honestly, I haven’t figured out what to think about this yet. But, +it’s here.
+
I know what to think of this: No fucking way do I want this.
+ +Update: I’ve already gotten a few reader responses arguing that this feature could be great for an Echo Show in the home of an elderly relative. You visit and set it up in their house, explain to them what it does, and then you can check in with them without their needing to do anything at all. I can see that. You can think of it as the digital equivalent of having a set of keys to someone’s house — something you’d only grant to a deeply trusted friend or loved one.
+ +++ +Starting on June 30, 2017, att.net customers will no longer be +able to log in to their Yahoo and Tumblr accounts through email +addresses with the following domains: att.net, ameritech.net, +bellsouth.net, flash.net, nvbell.net, pacbell.net, prodigy.net, +sbcglobal.net, snet.net, swbell.net, and wans.net.
+
The sheer egregiousness of this is outrageous on its face, but it’s even worse when you consider that Tumblr, when it was independent, was a champion for net neutrality.
+ +Update: TechCrunch says it’s just a deal expiring, not spite:
+ +++ +As part of the new corporate merger of Yahoo and Aol under the +Oath brand, it looks like Yahoo accounts will no longer be +accessible through AT&T email addresses (or those of any A&T +subsidiaries).
+ +The move provoked some uproar among net neutrality advocates, but +it seems to be less about creating walled gardens and more about +cleaning up prior commitments and pre-existing partnerships. +While there is a level of inconvenience for AT&T customers, this +is less about net neutrality and more about unwinding those +corporate deals.
+
I still say fuck Verizon and their stance on net neutrality.
+ +The brand new Timing fixes that. It automatically tracks which apps, documents and websites you use — without start/stop timers. See how you spend your time, eliminate distracting activities, and improve your client billing. Mind you, this data is super sensitive, so Timing keeps it safe on your Mac.
+ +Stop worrying about time and focus on doing your best work instead.
+ +Download a free 14-day trial today and get 10 percent off through next Monday.
+ +++ +“App thinning” is not a magic bullet that erases this problem +though, as Facebook Messenger, which shows as being 154 MB, still +downloaded 99 MB of data for its update. […]
+ +So are giant app sizes a problem? Yes. Do delta updates allow +these updates to use less data? Yes. Do delta updates make these +large apps a non-issue? Hell no!
+
++ +Amazon / Whole Foods will be the fourth-largest grocer in the US, +and will likely post growth rates no $10B+ retailer, sans Amazon, +has registered. The Seattle firm will apply its operational chops +and lower (zero) profit hurdle to the Whole Foods business model +and bring prices (way) down. If you wish you could shop at Whole +Foods more often, but it’s too expensive, your prayers have been +answered. Whole Foods will become the grocery equivalent of a +Mercedes for the price of a Toyota. Grocery has stuck their chin +out (little innovation), and the entire sector is about to have +its jaw shattered.
+
It’s a great piece. I disagree with him on this though:
+ +++ +Amazon will displace Apple as the top tech hardware innovator, +with Alexa cementing itself as the gadget that defines the decade +(post iPhone). Grocery / commerce via Alexa will create the +utility that Alexa needs to [maintain its lead] over Google and +Apple’s home / voice offerings as they try to play catch-up.
+
Alexa may well maintain its lead in the smart speaker market. It may even grow. Maybe HomePod will be a complete bust. But even if all of that happens, the smartphone will remain the dominant device in people’s lives. Something will eventually replace the phone, but smart speakers aren’t it.
+ +Hardware just isn’t where Amazon is good.
+ +++ +Google is stopping one of the most controversial advertising +formats: ads inside Gmail that scan users’ email contents. The +decision didn’t come from Google’s ad team, but from its cloud +unit, which is angling to sign up more corporate customers.
+ +Alphabet Inc.’s Google Cloud sells a package of office software, +called G Suite, that competes with market leader Microsoft Corp. +Paying Gmail users never received the email-scanning ads like the +free version of the program, but some business customers were +confused by the distinction and its privacy implications, said +Diane Greene, Google’s senior vice president of cloud. “What we’re +going to do is make it unambiguous,” she said.
+
This is terrific news. Not just because it’s a good policy change in and of itself, but I take it as a sign that Google’s leadership is starting to realize how much damage they’ve done to the company’s reputation by playing fast and loose with their users’ privacy.
+ +++ +Since the days of the NES, people have accused Nintendo of +intentionally underproducing hardware in order to drive an +artificial feeding frenzy of demand in the marketplace. With the +Nintendo Switch remaining nearly impossible to find at retailers +nationwide, those same accusations of “false scarcity” have been +bubbling up in certain corners.
+ +Nintendo Senior Director of Corporate Communications Charlie +Scibetta wants to push back on those accusations. “It’s definitely +not intentional in terms of shorting the market,” he told Ars in a +recent interview. “We’re making it as fast as we can. We want to +get as many units out as we can to support all the software that’s +coming out right now… our job really is to get it out as quick +as we can, especially for this holiday because we want to have +units on shelves to support Super Mario Odyssey.”
+
++ +Popular social networking apps are over 400 megs. With weekly +releases, over one year you’ll download twenty gigs of data.
+ +Since we launched Halide, the most unexpected compliment we’ve +heard is about its size. At 11 megs, we’ll push less data in one +year than a social network pushes in a single update.
+ +“So you aren’t using Swift,” asked a friend. After all, Swift +bundles its standard libraries into your app, bloating its size. +Halide is almost entirely Swift. How did we do it? Let’s start +with the technical bits.
+
His conclusion is spot-on:
+ +++ +There really is one weird trick to lose size: focus on your customers.
+
++ +This got me thinking — as a user who has a lot of apps +installed, how much bandwidth does my phone use to keep my apps +updated? […]
+ +One Friday I turned off auto-update for apps and let the update +queue build up for a week. The results shocked me.
+
It’s getting to the point where most apps can’t be updated over cellular because they’re all over 100 MB. This is madness.
+ +Update: Many readers have written to argue that the listed sizes in the App Store aren’t what you actually download when updating an app, thanks to app thinning and other features. OK, but even with app thinning and delta updates these apps are still way too big as downloads and take up way too much storage on devices.
+ +++ +More than one thousand current Uber employees have signed a letter +to the company’s board of directors, asking for the return of +deposed CEO Travis Kalanick “in an operational role.” One of its +venture capital investors also is chiming in, with a similar +message.
+
Not surprising to me at all — Uber was made in Kalanick’s image.
+ +++ +It was Lao Tzu who said that “the journey of a thousand miles +begins with a single step.”
+ +In the case of complete and utter change reeling through Uber +right now — culminating in the resignation of its once +untouchable CEO Travis Kalanick — it turns out that it began with +one of the most epic blog posts to be written about what happens +when a hot company becomes hostage to its increasingly +dysfunctional and toxic behaviors.
+ +It was clear from the moment you read the 3,000-word post by +former engineer Susan Fowler about her time at the car-hailing +company that nothing was going to be the same. Titled simply, +“Reflecting on one very, very strange year at Uber,” the +essay deftly and surgically laid out the map that the media and +others would use to prove to its out-to-lunch board and waffling +investors that Uber CEO Travis Kalanick had to go.
+
The truth and courage are a powerful combination.
+ +++ +During a recent investigation into how a drug-trial recruitment +company called Acurian Health tracks down people who look online +for information about their medical conditions, we discovered +NaviStone’s code on sites run by Acurian, Quicken Loans, a +continuing education center, a clothing store for plus-sized +women, and a host of other retailers. Using Javascript, those +sites were transmitting information from people as soon as they +typed or auto-filled it into an online form. That way, the company +would have it even if those people immediately changed their minds +and closed the page. […]
+ +We decided to test how the code works by pretending to shop on +sites that use it and then browsing away without finalizing the +purchase. Three sites — hardware site Rockler.com, gift site +CollectionsEtc.com, and clothing site BostonProper.com — sent us +emails about items we’d left in our shopping carts using the email +addresses we’d typed onto the site but had not formally submitted. +Although Gizmodo was able to see the email address information +being sent to Navistone, the company said that it was not +responsible for those emails.
+
They weren’t responsible for sending the emails, but they were responsible for the email addresses being sent to those websites in the first place. Sending form data surreptitiously is morally wrong, and everyone knows it.
+ +This might sound hyperbolic, but I mean it: I think we’d be better off if JavaScript had never been added to web browsers.
+ +++ +But even when it steers through that thicket of crises, Uber will +have to come to grips with a fundamental vulnerability that is +increasingly apparent in the company’s business model. Uber may be +great at technology, but unlike the businesses of Google, +Facebook, Apple or Amazon, technology hasn’t proven to be a +significant barrier to new entrants in ride-sharing. Across the +globe, Uber has dozens of competitors, and in many markets they +have grabbed the lion’s share of the ride-sharing market.
+ +Even if Uber fixes all of its current problems, it’s increasingly +unlikely that it can live up to the inflated expectations that +come with the nearly $70 billion valuation that have made it the +world’s most valuable startup. There are barbarians at Uber’s +gate, and it’s sorely in need of a moat.
+
This is why they’re pursuing self-driving technology so aggressively. There’s simply no way that Uber is worth $70 billion without some sort of exclusive technical advantage. That’s the interesting flip side to Kalanick’s ouster — I’m not sure who would want the job.
+ +++ +Travis Kalanick’s final hours as Uber’s chief executive played out +in a private room in a downtown Chicago hotel on Tuesday.
+ +There, Mr. Kalanick, who was on a trip to interview executive +candidates for Uber, was paid a surprise visit. Two venture +capitalists — Matt Cohler and Peter Fenton of the Silicon Valley +firm Benchmark, which is one of Uber’s biggest shareholders — +presented Mr. Kalanick with a list of demands, including his +resignation before the end of the day. The letter was from five of +Uber’s major investors, including Benchmark and the mutual fund +giant Fidelity Investments. […]
+ +By the end of the day, after hours of haggling and arguing, that +course was clear: Mr. Kalanick agreed to step down as Uber’s chief +executive.
+
Truly great reporting from Isaac, including the fact that even during his brief “leave of absence”, he wasn’t really absent at all:
+ +++ +In reality, Mr. Kalanick had little intention of staying away from +his company. Almost immediately after announcing the leave of +absence, he worked the phones to push out Mr. Bonderman for making +the sexist comment onstage at an Uber employee meeting. With the +two increasingly at odds, Mr. Kalanick sent out a flurry of texts, +phone calls and emails to his allies to pressure Mr. Bonderman to +step down from Uber’s board. Hours later, Mr. Bonderman did.
+
++ +The last installment of the original “Choose Your Own Adventure” +series came out in 1998, but since 2004, Chooseco, founded by +one of the series’ original authors, R.A. Montgomery, has been +republishing classic volumes, as well as new riffs on the form of +interactive fiction that seemed ubiquitous in the 1980s and ’90s. +The new editions also carry an additional feature — maps of the +hidden structure of each book.
+
Just looking at the maps included in the article, it’s interesting how wildly varying in complexity these stories were. See also: Christian Swinehart’s color-coded graphical representations of these books.
+ +(Via Kottke.)
+ +++ +Museum Historian John Markoff moderates a discussion with former +iPhone team members Hugo Fiennes, Nitin Ganatra and Scott Herz, +followed by a conversation with Scott Forstall.
+
Fascinating stories.
+ +Forstall was great. It’s hard to believe he’s been out of Apple and out of the limelight for 5 years — watching him on stage with Markoff it feels like he never left.
+ +++ +Uber confirmed the resignation, and the company’s board issued a +statement that said, in part: “Travis has always put Uber first. +This is a bold decision and a sign of his devotion and love for +Uber.” (For those who don’t speak fluent tech director, there are +four things in those two sentences that are not true.)
+
++ +In the letter, titled “Moving Uber Forward” and obtained by The +New York Times, the investors wrote to Mr. Kalanick that he must +immediately leave and that the company needed a change in +leadership. Mr. Kalanick, 40, consulted with at least one Uber +board member, and after long discussions with some of the +investors, he agreed to step down. He will remain on Uber’s board +of directors.
+ +“I love Uber more than anything in the world and at this difficult +moment in my personal life I have accepted the investors request +to step aside so that Uber can go back to building rather than be +distracted with another fight,” Mr. Kalanick said in a statement.
+
From the outside, it seems like this was inevitable. It was only a question of when.
+ +++ +Turns out that Tesla isn’t a good fit for me after all. I’m interested to hear about interesting roles for a seasoned engineering leader!
+
That was quick — he was only hired 5 months ago.
+ +Functional and fun yet mnml af. 🤔 😆 🔥
+ +++ +A recording of an internal briefing at Apple earlier this month +obtained by The Outline sheds new light on how far the most +valuable company in the world will go to prevent leaks about new +products. […]
+ +The briefing, which offers a revealing window into the company’s +obsession with secrecy, was the first of many Apple is planning to +host for employees. In it, Rice and Freedman speak candidly about +Apple’s efforts to prevent leaks, discuss how previous leakers got +caught, and take questions from the approximately 100 attendees.
+
There’s some irony in a leaked recording of an internal briefing on stopping leaks.
+ +This is news to me:
+ +++ +However, Rice says, Apple has cracked down on leaks from its +factories so successfully that more breaches are now happening on +Apple’s campuses in California than its factories abroad. “Last +year was the first year that Apple [campuses] leaked more than the +supply chain,” Rice tells the room. “More stuff came out of Apple +[campuses] last year than all of our supply chain combined.” […]
+ +In the years since Tim Cook pledged to double down on secrecy, +Rice’s team has gotten better at safeguarding enclosures. “In 2014 +we had 387 enclosures stolen,” he says. “In 2015 we had 57 +enclosures stolen, 50 of which were stolen on the night of +announce, which was so painful.” In 2016, Rice says the company +produced 65 million housings, and only four were stolen. “So it’s +about a one in 16 million loss ratio, which is unheard of in the +industry.”
+
There’s a short (15 minute) podcast that accompanies the report, with Turton and The Outline’s Adrianne Jeffries. It’s worth a listen. (It doesn’t seem possible to link directly to a single episode of their podcast, so here’s a direct link for Overcast users.)
+ +Sponsored by:
+ +Here’s an annotated screenshot (and threaded rant) I posted to Twitter while trying to read Steven Sinofksy’s WWDC 2017 trip report on my iPad Pro review unit last week.
+ +Safari already has a built-in Sharing button. It has all the options for sharing I need. And as I scroll the page, it disappears so that I can see as much text on screen as possible. Safari is designed to be reader-friendly, as it should be. But it’s trivial to get that Sharing button back when I want it – just tap the bottom of the screen and there it is. Easy.
+ +This is now a very common design pattern for mobile web layouts. Medium is far from alone. It’s getting hard to find a news site that doesn’t put a persistent sharing dickbar down there.
+ +More examples:
+ +TechCrunch’s waste of space deserves special mention, for having a persistent navbar at the top and a persistent ad, in addition to their sharing dickbar.
+ +I’m sure “engagement” does register higher with these sharing dickbars, but I suspect a big part of that is because of accidental taps. And even so, what is more important, readability or “engagement”? Medium wants to be about readability but that’s hard to square with this dickbar, and especially hard to square with the “Open in App” button floating above it.
+ +iOS also has a standard way to prompt users to install the app version of a website — Smart App Banners. And it’s user-dismissible.
+ +For any piece over a page long, I read Medium pieces with Safari’s Reader Mode. Medium is supposed to be a reader-optimized layout by default. It should be one of the sites where you’re never even tempted to switch to Reader Mode.
+ +I’m frustrated by this design pattern everywhere I see it. But I’m especially disappointed by Medium’s adoption of it. I don’t expect better from most websites. I do expect better from Medium.
+ +A website should not fight the browser. Let the browser provide the chrome, and simply provide the content. Web developers know this is right — these dickbars are being rammed down their throats by SEO experts. The SEO folks are the same dopes who came up with the genius strategy of requiring 5-10 megabytes of privacy-intrusive CPU-intensive JavaScript on every page load that slows down websites. Now they come to their teams and say, “Our pages are too slow — we gotta move to AMP so our pages load fast.”
+ +I don’t expect to break through to the SEO shitheads running the asylums at most of these publications, but Medium is supposed to be good. When people click a URL and see that it’s a Medium site, their reaction should be “Oh, good, a Medium site — this will be nice to read.” Right now it’s gotten to the point where when people realize an article is on Medium, they think, “Oh, crap, it’s on Medium.”
+ + + + ]]>++ +Verdict: The Surface Laptop is not a laptop. It’s a glue-filled +monstrosity. There is nothing about it that is upgradable or +long-lasting, and it literally can’t be opened without destroying +it. (Show us the procedure, Microsoft, we’d love to be wrong.)
+
iFixit’s point of view on this is logical, and they’re certainly not alone in wishing for the good old days of user-accessible and user-upgradeable components. But it’s silly to argue that the Surface Laptop is “not a laptop” only because it’s a sealed box. It’s like saying the iPhone is not a phone because it doesn’t have a replaceable battery.
+ +Update: Apple’s AirPods got a 0/10 from iFixit. That just goes to show how little correlation there is between iFixit’s concept of repairability and whether a product is good or not. I consider AirPods to be Apple’s best new product in years.
+ +++ +Standard Ebooks is a volunteer driven, not-for-profit project +that produces lovingly formatted, open source, and free public +domain ebooks.
+ +Ebook projects like Project Gutenberg transcribe ebooks and +make them available for the widest number of reading devices. +Standard Ebooks takes ebooks from sources like Project +Gutenberg, formats and typesets them using a carefully designed +and professional-grade style guide, lightly modernizes them, +fully proofreads and corrects them, and then builds them to +take advantage of state-of-the-art ereader and browser +technology. […]
+ +Other free ebooks don’t put much effort into professional-quality +typography: they use "straight" quotes instead of “curly” quotes, +they ignore details like em- and en-dashes, and they look more +like early-90’s web pages instead of actual books.
+ +The Standard Ebooks project applies a rigorous and modern +typography manual when developing each and every ebook to ensure +they meet a professional-grade and consistent typographical +standard. Our ebooks look good.
+
What a fantastic project. Project Gutenberg is an amazing library, but their books are a mess typographically. (Via Daniel Bogan.)
+ +++ +According to Sensor Tower’s analysis of App Intelligence, +the total space required by the top 10 most installed U.S. iPhone +apps has grown from 164 MB in May 2013 to about 1.8 GB last month, +an 11× or approximately 1,000 percent increase in just four years. +In the following report, we delve deeper into which apps have +grown the most.
+
Apple really needs to do something about this. It’s not just that these apps are too big, but some of them issue software updates every week (or even more frequently). It’s a huge waste of bandwidth, time, and on-device storage space.
+ +++ +At long last, the perfect score for arcade classic Ms. Pac-Man has +been achieved, though not by a human. Maluuba — a deep learning +team acquired by Microsoft in January — has created an AI system +that’s learned how to reach the game’s maximum point value of +999,900 on Atari 2600, using a unique combination of reinforcement +learning with a divide-and-conquer method.
+
Unlike the notoriously bad 2600 port of Pac-Man, the Ms. Pac-Man port was both fun and true to the spirit of the coin-op.
+ +++ +As devices change, our visual language changes with them. It’s +time to move away from the navbar in favor of navigation within +thumb-reach. For the purposes of this article, we’ll call that +Reach Navigation.
+
This design trend is clearly already underway, and Ellis does a terrific job explaining why it’s a good idea.
+ +I can think of a few factors that led to the original iPhone having a top-of-the-screen UI for navigation. First, at just 3.5 inches diagonally, the whole screen was reachable. But another factor might be as simple as the fact that “navigation” was always at the top on desktops — window titles and controls have always been at the top on Mac and Windows. The iPhone didn’t use windows, per se, but there was a certain familiarity with having the titles and controls like Back/Close/Done buttons at the top. Something like the iOS 10 bottom-heavy design of Apple Maps is wholly different from a desktop UI design — as it should be.
+ +++ +As Mackey surely understood, this meant that AmazonFresh was at a +cost disadvantage to physical grocers as well: in order to be +competitive AmazonFresh needed to stock a lot of perishable items; +however, as long as AmazonFresh was not operating at meaningful +scale a huge number of those perishable items would spoil. And, +given the inherent local nature of groceries, scale needed to be +achieved not on a national basis but a city one.
+ +Groceries are a fundamentally different problem that need a +fundamentally different solution; what is so brilliant about this +deal, though, is that it solves the problem in a fundamentally +Amazonian way.
+
++ +At WWDC this year, Apple senior vice president of software +engineering Craig Federighi performed a demo of the company’s new +augmented reality platform, ARKit, while mentioning popular +furniture company IKEA as an upcoming partner in the technology. +Similarly, Apple CEO Tim Cook referenced an Ikea AR partnership in +a recent interview with Bloomberg Businessweek.
+ +Now, Ikea executive Michael Valdsgaard has spoken about the +company’s partnership with Apple and ARKit, describing an all-new +augmented reality app that will help customers make “reliable +buying decisions” for Ikea’s big ticket items.
+
Very cool idea — probably the sort of thing that’s going to be common soon. I’m curious how much of a leg up ARKit will give iOS on this front.
+ +Buying a domain from Squarespace is quick, simple, and fun. Search for the domain you want, or type any word or phrase into the search field and Squarespace will suggest some great options. Every domain comes with a beautiful, ad-free parking page, WHOIS Privacy, and a 2048-bit SSL certificate to secure your website — all at no additional cost. Once you lock down your domain, create a beautiful website with one of Squarespace’s award-winning templates. Try Squarespace for free. When you’re ready to subscribe, get 10% off at squarespace.com with offer code “DARING17”.
+ +++ +How did iPhone come to be? On June 20, four members of the +original development team will discuss the secret Apple project, +which in the past decade has remade the computer industry, changed +the business landscape, and become a tool in the hands of more +than a billion people around the world.
+ +Part 1: Original iPhone Engineers Nitin Ganatra, Scott Herz, and +Hugo Fiennes in Conversation with John Markoff
+ +Part 2: Original iPhone Software Team Leader Scott Forstall in +Conversation with John Markoff
+
It kills me that I can’t make this. Hopefully there will be video.
+ +Here’s the thing: Forstall was obviously a divisive figure inside Apple. He saw himself as an indispensable man after Steve Jobs died, and it turns out he wasn’t.
+ +But there can be no dispute that Forstall led one of the most successful software projects ever undertaken. It’s a cliche to say that they achieved the impossible, but what Forstall’s team achieved was considered by many — including many of the members of the team — impossible. But they did it, and in the ensuing years they kept making iOS better and better. It’s not just that they managed to ship the original iPhone OS in June 2007, but the entire run up through Forstall’s ouster from the company was simply amazing.
+ +Across the company, it’s clear that Forstall’s style was not popular. But I know many people who worked on his iOS team, and most of them loved working for him, or at the very least appreciated working for him. The thing I’ve heard over and over is that Forstall was incredibly demanding, yes, but if you were on his team and did good work he had your back.
+ +Forstall pretty much hasn’t said a damn thing about Apple since he left the company five years ago. So if he opens up at all to Markoff, this could be fascinating. His team’s story about actually implementing the original iPhone remains largely untold.
+ +++ +And, of course, we talk about the quotes from Tony Fadell and +Brett Bilbrey in the excerpt we just published, in which Fadell +tells a story about Phil Schiller arguing the iPhone should have a +hardware keyboard. Schiller has said the story isn’t true, and +Fadell has tried to walk it back as well.
+ +“So I wasn’t in the room at Apple 10, 15 years ago when this would +have happened,” says Merchant, who has the exchange on tape. “But +this is a quote verbatim as Tony Fadell who was in the room told +it to me. He told me this quote in such detail and he gave such a +vivid account, and I had no reason to believe it was untrue.”
+ +Merchant says the controversy has “blown him away.”
+
I figured Merchant had Fadell’s interview recorded. The quotes were too extensive not to have been recorded. It’s pretty clear what happened: Fadell told Merchant exactly what he’s quoted as saying, but now that he’s seen how it’s playing out, he wants to walk it back. It’s a little late for that.
+ +++ +A good way to think about the iPad’s new display with ProMotion +is not the difference between low-res and Retina screens, but +the jump from 30fps to 60fps. You see more of every animation. +Text is more legible when you scroll and doesn’t judder. It’s +hard to explain and it has to be seen and experienced to be +fully understood. Every scroll, page transition, and app launch +animation on the 10.5″ iPad Pro is absurdly smooth to the point +of feeling unrealistic at first — hence the common reaction +that something doesn’t quite compute. But as you spend some time +with the new iPad and start using it on a daily basis, its +display becomes normal and you wish that other Apple displays +were the same.
+ +I’m not even a week into my tests with the 10.5″ iPad Pro, and +I think scrolling on my first-gen 12.9″ iPad Pro looks choppy +now. I’d be surprised if 120Hz displays with ProMotion don’t +expand to the iPhone later this year and other Apple computers +in the future. The combination of hardware and software really +is that good.
+
Last year when True Tone was introduced with the 9.7-inch iPad Pro, Phil Schiller said something to the effect of “Once you get used to True Tone, you can’t go back.” I optimistically took that as a sign that the iPhone 7 would have True Tone. It did not, and the reason is probably that True Tone requires additional hardware sensors on the front face to pick up the ambient light temperature, and the iPhone has less room for additional sensors. But with ProMotion, I’m really hopeful that it’ll make its way into this year’s new iPhones. ProMotion doesn’t require additional sensors — only a super-fast GPU (which the iPhone will have) and intricate software support in iOS (which work Apple has already done for the iPad Pro).
+ +Anyway, it’s really hard to quote just one bit from Viticci’s review. If you only thoroughly read one review of the new iPad Pro, it should be his. Nobody outside Apple cares as much about iPad as he does.
+ +Matthew Panzarino, TechCrunch, “Apple Pays Off Its Future-of-Computing Promise With iPad Pro”:
+ +++ +After playing with the new iPad Pro 10.5” for a few days, I am +convinced that it’s fairly impossible to do a detailed review of +it in its current state.
+ +Not because there is some sort of flaw, but because it was clearly +designed top to bottom as an empty vessel in which to pour iOS 11.
+ +Every feature, every hardware advancement, every piece of +understated technical acrobatics is in the service of making +Apple’s next-generation software shine.
+
Dieter Bohn, The Verge, “iPad Pro 10.5 Review: Overkill”:
+ +++ +I was all set to complain that increasing the size from 9.7 to +10.5 was not a big enough jump to justify requiring people to buy +new keyboards and accessories. Then I started typing on the +on-screen keyboard and on the new hardware Smart Keyboard. Even +though I’m dubious about Apple’s claim that the software keyboard +is “full size”, I find the slight size increase makes touch typing +much easier. It’s still a little cramped, but it’s much easier to +bounce between this and a real keyboard now.
+
It really does make a difference in typing, and no practical difference at all in terms of holdability.
+ +Bohn again:
+ +++ +To me, if you’re going to spend $650 on a computer, it should +almost surely be your main computer. And if you’re going to make +the iPad Pro your main computer, you should probably get more than +64GB of storage and you should also probably get a keyboard to go +with it (to say nothing of the Apple Pencil). It hits the $1,000 +mark very quickly.
+
I don’t agree with the notion that a $650 computer should be your “main computer” at all. Apple stuff isn’t for the budget-conscious — news at 11.
+ +Brian X. Chen, The New York Times, “New iPad Pro Inches Toward Replacing PC, but Falls Short”:
+ +++ +Five years later, Mr. Jobs’s successor, Timothy D. Cook, took the +iPad a step further. Unveiling the iPad Pro, a souped-up tablet +that worked with Apple’s keyboard and stylus, he remarked that +people would try the product and “conclude they no longer need to +use anything else, other than their phones.”
+ +That prediction has not appeared to come true. Many professionals +say they use an iPad in addition to a personal computer, and sales +of iPads have shrunk quarter after quarter for more than a year, +an indication that hordes of people were not trading in their PCs +for tablets just yet.
+ +That situation is unlikely to change with Apple’s newest iPad Pro, +which will be released this week. […] But after about a week of +testing the 10.5-inch iPad Pro, I concluded that Apple’s +professional tablet still suffers from some of the same problems +when compared with a laptop.
+
That’s a slanted truncation of Cook’s quote. Cook’s full quote: “Yes, the iPad Pro is a replacement for a notebook or a desktop for many, many people. They will start using it and conclude they no longer need to use anything else, other than their phones.” Chen’s truncation makes it sound like Cook claimed the iPad Pro was a Mac or Windows replacement for everyone. He didn’t. And the fact that the new iPad Pro debuted alongside new MacBooks, MacBook Pros, and even more-megahertz-in-the-box MacBook Airs shows that Apple doesn’t think so either. Update: And I completely forgot to mention the solid updates to the iMacs and the announcement of the iMac Pro.
+ +“I prefer a laptop to an iPad Pro” is very different from “A laptop is better than an iPad Pro”. Me, personally, I much prefer working on a MacBook Pro to an iPad Pro. But I can see why others feel the opposite. That’s the whole point of Apple’s strategy of keeping them separate, rather than unifying them Microsoft Surface-style.
+ +iPad’s slowly diminishing sales are a real thing. But I don’t think that can be used as a gauge for whether more and more people are using an iPad as their main computer. And iPad sales are still more than double those of the Mac. There’s no reason to doubt that “many, many people” are concluding they no longer need a Mac or PC.
+ +Andrew Cunningham, Ars Technica, “The 10.5-Inch iPad Pro Is Much More “Pro” Than What It Replaces”:
+ +++ +Of all the computers Apple sells, none of them has screens that do +quite as much stuff as the iPad Pros are doing.
+ +That list starts with DCI-P3 color gamut support (new in the +12.9-inch Pro, returning to the smaller one) and an +anti-reflective coating, features also present in recent iMacs and +MacBook Pros. But the True Tone feature, which detects the color +temperature of the ambient light, adjusts the display’s color +temperature to match. Most significantly, the iPad’s refresh rate +has been bumped up to 120Hz, twice the normal 60Hz. The screens in +the iPad Pros are the best screens Apple ships, which is +appropriate for a thing that’s just a giant screen by design.
+ +The 10.5-inch Pro has a 2224×1668 screen, up just a little bit +from the 2048×1536 in 9.7-inch iPads. The density is identical, so +photos and text are exactly the same size they were before; you +can just fit a bit more of them on-screen at once.
+
That’s important to note. There was some clever speculation by Dan Provost a few months ago that the 10.5-inch iPad would have the same pixel dimensions as the 12.9-inch iPad Pro, with a higher pixels-per-inch density. That’s what Apple did with the iPad Mini. The problem with that speculation is that while the math worked out, the size of things on screen would not. Everything would be shrunk by 20 percent. Not everyone’s eyes can handle that. That’s fine for the Mini — which is often used by sharp-eyed children — but not fine for the standard size iPad.
+ +I had been thinking that maybe what Apple would do is what Provost suggested, but offer a choice between standard and zoomed mode like the Plus-sized iPhones do. Nope. I think what they’ve done is better though, because I think a scaled “zoomed” interface would look blurry at just 324 ppi. The iPhone Plus displays have a resolution of 401 ppi.
+ +Harry McCracken, Fast Company, “A Better Window Into The World Of Apps”:
+ +++ + + + ]]>You can suss out a lot about Apple’s priorities from the aspects +of a product it leaves alone and the ones it never stops +obsessing over.
+ +Consider the iPad. Every generation of Apple’s tablet since the +first one in 2010 has had the same stated battery life–“up to 10 +hours”–which suggests that the company thinks that shooting for +anything in excess of that would be wasted effort.
+ +That 2010 iPad weighed a pound and a half, and felt a bit hefty in +the hand. With 2013’s iPad Air, Apple whittled that down to about +a pound. And there the mid-sized iPads have stayed, +weight-reduction mission accomplished.
+ +However, when it comes to the iPad’s display, Apple has never been +satisfied to rest on its technological laurels.
+
But Fadell spoke to Merchant extensively, including this shot at Phil Schiller:
+ +++ +The iPod phone was losing support. The executives debated which +project to pursue, but Phil Schiller, Apple’s head of marketing, +had an answer: Neither. He wanted a keyboard with hard buttons. +The BlackBerry was arguably the first hit smartphone. It had an +email client and a tiny hard keyboard. After everyone else, +including Fadell, started to agree that multitouch was the way +forward, Schiller became the lone holdout.
+ +He “just sat there with his sword out every time, going, ‘No, +we’ve got to have a hard keyboard. No. Hard keyboard.’ And he +wouldn’t listen to reason as all of us were like, ‘No, this works +now, Phil.’ And he’d say, ‘You gotta have a hard keyboard!’” +Fadell says.
+
I don’t know if it’s true or not that Schiller was singlehandedly pushing for a Blackberry-style keyboard. But even if true, it only looks foolish in hindsight, especially if this argument took place before the iPhone’s software team had come up with a proof-of-concept software keyboard. Today it’s clear that the iPhone needed a good keyboard, and that a touchscreen keyboard can be a good keyboard. Neither of those things was obvious in 2005. And in the context of this story, it’s clear that at the time of this purported argument, Steve Jobs and Apple weren’t yet sure if the iPhone should be a pocket-sized personal computer or a consumer electronics product that would have no more need for a keyboard (hardware or software) than an iPod did. My guess is that Schiller was insisting that the iPhone needed to be a personal computer, not a mere gadget, and it wasn’t unreasonable to believe a software keyboard wouldn’t be good enough. For chrissakes there were critics who insisted that the iPhone’s software keyboard wasn’t good enough for years after the iPhone actually shipped.
+ +I do know that Schiller’s hard-charging, brusque style and his obvious political acumen have made him a lot of enemies over the years. It sounds like Fadell is one of them.
+ +So I’ll just say this: this story about Phil Schiller pushing for a hardware keyboard comes from one source (so far — if anyone out there can back that up, my window is always open for little birdies), and that one source is the guy who admittedly spent over a year working on iPhone prototypes with a click wheel interface.
+ +Then there’s this:
+ +++ +Schiller didn’t have the same technological acumen as many of the +other execs. “Phil is not a technology guy,” Brett Bilbrey, the +former head of Apple’s Advanced Technology Group, says. “There +were days when you had to explain things to him like a +grade-school kid.” Jobs liked him, Bilbrey thinks, because he +“looked at technology like middle America does, like Grandma and +Grandpa did.”
+
Hats off to Bilbrey for putting his name on this quote, but having spoken to Schiller both on- and off-the-record many times, the idea that he “looks at technology … like Grandma and Grandpa did” and needs things explained to him “like a grade-school kid” is bullshit. Especially off-the-record, Schiller can drill down on technical details to a surprising degree. I don’t know what Schiller did to piss off Bilbrey, but Bilbrey either has a huge chip on his shoulder or was severely misquoted by Merchant.1
+ +Anyway, I sure wish this book excerpt had come out before my live episode of The Talk Show last week — now I do have one more question I wish I’d gotten to ask Schiller.
+ +Here’s a story from Yoni Heisler for Network World on Brett Bilbrey’s retirement from Apple in 2014. Bilbrey headed Apple’s Technology Advancement Group. Merchant describes Bilbrey as having led “Apple’s Advanced Technology Group”. It’s a small detail, and the names are clearly similar, but the Advanced Technology Group was Larry Tesler’s R&D division at Apple, from 1986-1997. It was among the numerous divisions and products that Steve Jobs shitcanned after he rejoined the company. ↩︎
+Display: The new iPad Pros have the best displays of any computer I’ve ever seen. True Tone plus ProMotion is simply terrific. (The first generation 12.9-inch iPad Pro didn’t have True Tone; with these new models, the only noticeable difference between the 12.9- and 10.5-inch models is the size.) You really do have to see the 120 Hz refresh rate in person — and play with it while scrolling content on screen — to get it. You can actually read text as it’s moving during a scroll. It’s not as significant as the jump from non-retina to retina, but it’s in that ballpark.
Pencil: The latency of the Apple Pencil on a first-generation iPad Pro is the best I had ever seen for any stylus on any device at any price. The latency of the Apple Pencil on the new iPad Pro is so much better — so much closer to ink-on-paper imperceptibility — that you have to try it to believe it. It’s the one thing that really makes the first-gen iPad Pro feel “slow”.
Size: The increase in size is perfect. The footprint for a “regular” iPad has, until now, remained unchanged since the original iPad in 2010. That 9.7-inch display size was nearly perfect. This 10.5-inch display size is better though. Apple said during the keynote that typing on the on-screen keyboard is surprisingly better given just a bit more room, and I agree. And typing on the Smart Keyboard cover is way better than on last year’s 9.7-inch iPad Pro. In hand it doesn’t feel bigger at all. It feels like there were no trade-offs whatsoever in increasing the display size and overall device footprint. Part of that is because the weight has remained completely unchanged. I have had zero problems — not one — with the decreased bezel area. Apple’s inadvertent touch detection game is on point.
Battery: Battery life is great, as expected.
Performance: Apple’s in-house chip team continues to amaze. No one buys an iPad because of CPU benchmarks, but the new iPad Pro’s CPU performance is mind-boggling. Forget about comparisons to the one-port MacBook — the iPad Pro blows that machine out of the water performance-wise. The astounding thing is that the new iPad Pro holds its own against the MacBook Pro in single-core performance — around 3,900 on the Geekbench 4 benchmark for the iPad Pro vs. around 4,200–4,400 for the various configurations of 13- and 15-inch MacBook Pros.1 Multi-core performance has effectively doubled from the first generation of iPad Pro. That sort of year-over-year increase just doesn’t happen anymore, but here we are. The new iPad Pro gets a multi-core Geekbench 4 score of around 9200; the brand-new Core M3-based MacBook gets a multi-core score of around 6800. Again, this isn’t why people buy iPads — the iPad took off like a rocket in 2010 back when it was way slower (way way way slower) than even the slowest MacBook — but I think it is vastly underappreciated just how significantly Apple’s chip team is pulling ahead of the industry, especially Intel.2
All that said, the real story of these new iPad Pro models can’t be told today, because that story is iOS 11. I think iOS 11’s iPad-focused features are the entire reason why Apple waited until WWDC to unveil them. They could have held an event for them back in April, when they released the new starting-at-just-$329 9.7-inch iPad, but if they did, the only new software they could have demoed was Clips. I love Clips, but it’s just a fun little tool and doesn’t show off anything particular to iPad compared to iPhone.
+ +Again, the new iPad Pro hardware is almost too good to be true, but the iPad story Apple unveiled last week is iOS 11.
+ +It’s not fair to review a product running a developer beta of the OS — let alone the first (and generally buggiest) beta. So let’s stop the “review” right here: the new iPad Pros running iOS 10.3.2 are the best iPads ever made. You shouldn’t hesitate to buy one today, and if you do get one now, you should wait until iOS 11 ships in the fall to upgrade, or at the very least wait for a non-developer public beta of iOS 11 this summer before upgrading.
+ +But if you are reckless enough to install the iOS 11 beta on the new iPad Pro? Holy smokes is this better. I used the iPad Pro for a full week with iOS 10.3.2 because that’s the product that’s shipping, but after upgrading to iOS 11 beta 1 this morning and using it to write this entire review,3 I’m just blown away by how much more useful this machine is, and how much easier it is to work with 5 or 6 apps at a time.
+ +I would never recommend running a beta of any OS on any device that’s used for production purposes, so don’t take this as such, but for me personally, I can’t see going back to iOS 10.3.2 on any iPad that can handle it. It feels like a hand has been untied from behind my back, and this amazing hardware has finally been allowed to run free.
+ +You can browse Geekbench’s database of results for Mac and iOS. ↩︎
+Apple’s A10X chip is so high-performing that I think it’s put Apple in a slightly uncomfortable position marketing-wise. They can’t brag about it fully without making Intel (and by implication, their own MacBooks) look bad, and Intel remains an important partner for Apple. I don’t think it’s a coincidence that the most impressive iPad demo during the keynote (and the one that contained the most bragging about its performance compared to PCs) was done by a third-party developer — Ash Hewson of Serif, demonstrating Affinity Photo — not Greg Joswiak or anyone else from Apple. ↩︎︎
+Full disclosure: I went back to my Mac to write these 3 footnotes. That’s due more to the byzantine way I mark up footnotes than any limitation inherent to iOS vs. MacOS. But it feels worth noting. ↩︎︎
+++ +“Full Virus, Malware scanner”: What? I’m pretty sure it’s +impossible for any app to scan my iPhone for viruses or malware, +since third party apps are sandboxed to their own data, but let’s +keep reading…
+ +“You will pay $99.99 for a 7-day subscription”
+ +Uhh… come again?
+
There should be no “virus and malware” scanners in the App Store. None. iOS does not need anti-virus software. The App Store sandboxing rules mean that anti-virus software couldn’t really do anything useful anyway. And by allowing them to be listed on the store, it creates the false impression that Apple thinks you might need anti-virus software.
+ +But do-nothing anti-virus utilities that are scamming people into $100/week subscriptions? That’s downright criminal.
+ +Lin shows that “Mobile protection :Clean & Security VPN” is not alone. The productivity top-grossing list is riddled with similar scam apps.
+ +Given how many legitimate developers are still having problems getting their apps approved due to seemingly capricious App Store reviewer decisions, it’s doubly outrageous that these apps have made their way onto the store in the first place. These are the exact sort of apps that the App Store review process should be primarily looking to block.
+ +And there is no excuse for Apple not having flagged them after the fact, once they started generating significant revenue. It’s downright mind boggling that this horrendous “Mobile protection :Clean & Security VPN” app made it all the way into the top 10 without getting flagged.
+ +Based on Lin’s research, the pattern is simple:
+ +Apple needs to remove these apps from the App Store, and prevent such apps from getting into the store in the first place. They should reconsider the effects of allowing developers to buy their way to the top spot in search results. And they should police the top-grossing lists for apps that are pulling scams — the most important scams to catch are the successful ones.
+ +Lastly, every single dollar these apps have generated should be refunded to the victims of these scams.
+ + + + ]]>The California Theatre in San Jose has both an orchestra level and a balcony. That first bunch of tickets separated the two. After talking with the staff at the theater today, they recommended making all tickets general admission and allowing their ushers to fill the orchestra level first, and then direct remaining ticket holders to the balcony. So, all tickets, including those sold Wednesday, are now simply general admission. Everyone paid the same price, so I think this is fair, but I do apologize for any confusion. The theater is beautiful, and there are no bad seats.
+ +The next batch of tickets will go on sale today, Friday, at 1p ET/10a PT. Given what happened Wednesday, I expect them to sell out in a few minutes. I hate writing that because it sounds braggy, but I’m putting it out there just as fair warning. You’re going to have to act quick and maybe get lucky.
+ +If you want a ticket and wind up not getting one, there will be a live audio stream for everyone to listen to. This year we are not going to attempt to stream live video. Instead we’re going to work hard to get edited video of the event up on the web as soon as possible after the show is over. If you just can’t wait, listen to the live audio. If you want to see the show, wait for the video — it should be up some time on Wednesday at the latest.
+ +If you do get a ticket or already have one:
+ +New episode of America’s favorite 3-star podcast, with special guest John Moltz. Topics include more follow-up from WWDC 2017, the iPad Pro models and ProMotion, Scott Forstall’s interview with John Markoff regarding the 10-year anniversary of the original iPhone, the ongoing shitshow at Uber, quick thoughts on the Nintendo Switch, and more. Also: guess which John enjoys throwing babies into the air.
\n\nSponsored by:
\n\nJosh Centers, writing for TidBITS on Virgin Mobile’s intriguing decision to go iPhone-only:
\n\n\n\n\nPundits have long suspected that two roadblocks stood in the way\nof Apple becoming a carrier: the infrastructure is incredibly\nexpensive, even if you lease it from the larger carriers, and\nApple could limit the iPhone business if it were to compete with\nthe major carriers.
\n\nBut Apple has sidestepped those concerns by essentially taking\nover a carrier (actually a carrier-owned MVNO — Mobile Virtual\nNetwork Operator) without acquiring it. Apple may not own Virgin\nMobile, but Virgin Mobile is now utterly dependent on Apple and\nwill benefit through promotion in Apple Stores.
\n\nWe shouldn’t read too much into this deal, but at the very least\nit’s unusual to see a company like Virgin Mobile going all-in on\nthe iPhone. And it might point toward Apple dipping its toe into\nthe MVNO business.
\n
Virgin Mobile is owned by Sprint (and thus uses Sprint’s back-end), and in my experience Sprint is the worst of the U.S. carriers, so this is not a panacea. But it is intriguing.
\n\nTwo great examples via the very fun Made With ARKit Twitter account: here and here.
\n\nRene Ritchie has a comprehensive look at the just-released public beta of iOS 11. Romain Dillet has a good preview at TechCrunch too. The gist of both previews: it’s the “I hope Apple truly focuses on the iPad this year” release of iOS that we’ve been waiting for.
\n\nI’ve been using the developer betas on my 10.5-inch iPad Pro review unit and a spare iPhone. I’m willing to wait to install iOS 11 on my primary iPhone, but at this point, bugs be damned, I wouldn’t want to use an iPad running iOS 10.3. It’s stable enough, and the benefits of the great new features for iPad far outweigh the downsides of the beta (which, in addition to crashing bugs, include questionable battery life).
\n\nMat Honan, writing for BuzzFeed:
\n\n\n\n\nIt has this wild new feature called Drop In. Drop In lets you give\npeople permission to automatically connect with your device.\nHere’s how it works. Let’s say my father has activated Drop In for\nme on his Echo Show. All I have to do is say, “Alexa, drop in on\nDad.” It then turns on the microphone and camera on my father’s\ndevice and starts broadcasting that to me. For the several seconds\nof the call, my father’s video screen would appear fogged over.\nBut then there he’ll be. And to be clear: This happens even if he\ndoesn’t answer. Unless he declines the call, audibly or by tapping\non the screen, it goes through. It just starts. Hello, you look\nnice today.
\n\nHonestly, I haven’t figured out what to think about this yet. But,\nit’s here.
\n
I know what to think of this: No fucking way do I want this.
\n\nUpdate: I’ve already gotten a few reader responses arguing that this feature could be great for an Echo Show in the home of an elderly relative. You visit and set it up in their house, explain to them what it does, and then you can check in with them without their needing to do anything at all. I can see that. You can think of it as the digital equivalent of having a set of keys to someone’s house — something you’d only grant to a deeply trusted friend or loved one.
\n\nFrom a Tumblr help document euphemistically titled “Heads-Up for AT&T Customers”:
\n\n\n\n\nStarting on June 30, 2017, att.net customers will no longer be\nable to log in to their Yahoo and Tumblr accounts through email\naddresses with the following domains: att.net, ameritech.net,\nbellsouth.net, flash.net, nvbell.net, pacbell.net, prodigy.net,\nsbcglobal.net, snet.net, swbell.net, and wans.net.
\n
The sheer egregiousness of this is outrageous on its face, but it’s even worse when you consider that Tumblr, when it was independent, was a champion for net neutrality.
\n\nUpdate: TechCrunch says it’s just a deal expiring, not spite:
\n\n\n\n\nAs part of the new corporate merger of Yahoo and Aol under the\nOath brand, it looks like Yahoo accounts will no longer be\naccessible through AT&T email addresses (or those of any A&T\nsubsidiaries).
\n\nThe move provoked some uproar among net neutrality advocates, but\nit seems to be less about creating walled gardens and more about\ncleaning up prior commitments and pre-existing partnerships.\nWhile there is a level of inconvenience for AT&T customers, this\nis less about net neutrality and more about unwinding those\ncorporate deals.
\n
I still say fuck Verizon and their stance on net neutrality.
\n\nCopiously documented and perfectly presented. Looked striking in the print edition, too.
\n\nTime is your most precious resource. You need to know how you are spending it.
\nBut time tracking sucks. Big Time. (Pun intended.)
The brand new Timing fixes that. It automatically tracks which apps, documents and websites you use — without start/stop timers. See how you spend your time, eliminate distracting activities, and improve your client billing. Mind you, this data is super sensitive, so Timing keeps it safe on your Mac.
\n\nStop worrying about time and focus on doing your best work instead.
\n\nDownload a free 14-day trial today and get 10 percent off through next Monday.
\n\nMatt Birchler:
\n\n\n\n\n“App thinning” is not a magic bullet that erases this problem\nthough, as Facebook Messenger, which shows as being 154 MB, still\ndownloaded 99 MB of data for its update. […]
\n\nSo are giant app sizes a problem? Yes. Do delta updates allow\nthese updates to use less data? Yes. Do delta updates make these\nlarge apps a non-issue? Hell no!
\n
My thanks to Mnml for sponsoring this week’s DF RSS feed. It’s a native Mac app client for Medium, and can be used for writing, blogging, and notetaking. Based upon the same engine that twice won Desk “Best Apps of the Year” honors, Mnml has all the features you’ll need, wrapped in an attractive, fun – and yes, minimal – interface. Anyone who writes for Medium and prefers native client apps should check it out.
\n\nScott Galloway:
\n\n\n\n\nAmazon / Whole Foods will be the fourth-largest grocer in the US,\nand will likely post growth rates no $10B+ retailer, sans Amazon,\nhas registered. The Seattle firm will apply its operational chops\nand lower (zero) profit hurdle to the Whole Foods business model\nand bring prices (way) down. If you wish you could shop at Whole\nFoods more often, but it’s too expensive, your prayers have been\nanswered. Whole Foods will become the grocery equivalent of a\nMercedes for the price of a Toyota. Grocery has stuck their chin\nout (little innovation), and the entire sector is about to have\nits jaw shattered.
\n
It’s a great piece. I disagree with him on this though:
\n\n\n\n\nAmazon will displace Apple as the top tech hardware innovator,\nwith Alexa cementing itself as the gadget that defines the decade\n(post iPhone). Grocery / commerce via Alexa will create the\nutility that Alexa needs to [maintain its lead] over Google and\nApple’s home / voice offerings as they try to play catch-up.
\n
Alexa may well maintain its lead in the smart speaker market. It may even grow. Maybe HomePod will be a complete bust. But even if all of that happens, the smartphone will remain the dominant device in people’s lives. Something will eventually replace the phone, but smart speakers aren’t it.
\n\nHardware just isn’t where Amazon is good.
\n\nMark Bergen, reporting for Bloomberg:
\n\n\n\n\nGoogle is stopping one of the most controversial advertising\nformats: ads inside Gmail that scan users’ email contents. The\ndecision didn’t come from Google’s ad team, but from its cloud\nunit, which is angling to sign up more corporate customers.
\n\nAlphabet Inc.’s Google Cloud sells a package of office software,\ncalled G Suite, that competes with market leader Microsoft Corp.\nPaying Gmail users never received the email-scanning ads like the\nfree version of the program, but some business customers were\nconfused by the distinction and its privacy implications, said\nDiane Greene, Google’s senior vice president of cloud. “What we’re\ngoing to do is make it unambiguous,” she said.
\n
This is terrific news. Not just because it’s a good policy change in and of itself, but I take it as a sign that Google’s leadership is starting to realize how much damage they’ve done to the company’s reputation by playing fast and loose with their users’ privacy.
\n\nVia Jim Coudal, who summarizes this perfectly: “Poetry, in data”.
\n\nA succinct rundown of what’s wrong with the Senate Republicans’ “health care” bill.
\n\nKyle Orland, reporting for Ars Technica:
\n\n\n\n\nSince the days of the NES, people have accused Nintendo of\nintentionally underproducing hardware in order to drive an\nartificial feeding frenzy of demand in the marketplace. With the\nNintendo Switch remaining nearly impossible to find at retailers\nnationwide, those same accusations of “false scarcity” have been\nbubbling up in certain corners.
\n\nNintendo Senior Director of Corporate Communications Charlie\nScibetta wants to push back on those accusations. “It’s definitely\nnot intentional in terms of shorting the market,” he told Ars in a\nrecent interview. “We’re making it as fast as we can. We want to\nget as many units out as we can to support all the software that’s\ncoming out right now… our job really is to get it out as quick\nas we can, especially for this holiday because we want to have\nunits on shelves to support Super Mario Odyssey.”
\n
Ben Sandofsky:
\n\n\n\n\nPopular social networking apps are over 400 megs. With weekly\nreleases, over one year you’ll download twenty gigs of data.
\n\nSince we launched Halide, the most unexpected compliment we’ve\nheard is about its size. At 11 megs, we’ll push less data in one\nyear than a social network pushes in a single update.
\n\n“So you aren’t using Swift,” asked a friend. After all, Swift\nbundles its standard libraries into your app, bloating its size.\nHalide is almost entirely Swift. How did we do it? Let’s start\nwith the technical bits.
\n
His conclusion is spot-on:
\n\n\n\n\nThere really is one weird trick to lose size: focus on your customers.
\n
Jon Darke:
\n\n\n\n\nThis got me thinking — as a user who has a lot of apps\ninstalled, how much bandwidth does my phone use to keep my apps\nupdated? […]
\n\nOne Friday I turned off auto-update for apps and let the update\nqueue build up for a week. The results shocked me.
\n
It’s getting to the point where most apps can’t be updated over cellular because they’re all over 100 MB. This is madness.
\n\nUpdate: Many readers have written to argue that the listed sizes in the App Store aren’t what you actually download when updating an app, thanks to app thinning and other features. OK, but even with app thinning and delta updates these apps are still way too big as downloads and take up way too much storage on devices.
\n\nDan Primack, reporting for Axios:
\n\n\n\n\nMore than one thousand current Uber employees have signed a letter\nto the company’s board of directors, asking for the return of\ndeposed CEO Travis Kalanick “in an operational role.” One of its\nventure capital investors also is chiming in, with a similar\nmessage.
\n
Not surprising to me at all — Uber was made in Kalanick’s image.
\n\nKara Swisher:
\n\n\n\n\nIt was Lao Tzu who said that “the journey of a thousand miles\nbegins with a single step.”
\n\nIn the case of complete and utter change reeling through Uber\nright now — culminating in the resignation of its once\nuntouchable CEO Travis Kalanick — it turns out that it began with\none of the most epic blog posts to be written about what happens\nwhen a hot company becomes hostage to its increasingly\ndysfunctional and toxic behaviors.
\n\nIt was clear from the moment you read the 3,000-word post by\nformer engineer Susan Fowler about her time at the car-hailing\ncompany that nothing was going to be the same. Titled simply,\n“Reflecting on one very, very strange year at Uber,” the\nessay deftly and surgically laid out the map that the media and\nothers would use to prove to its out-to-lunch board and waffling\ninvestors that Uber CEO Travis Kalanick had to go.
\n
The truth and courage are a powerful combination.
\n\nGreat investigative work by Kashmir Hill and Surya Mattu for Gizmodo:
\n\n\n\n\nDuring a recent investigation into how a drug-trial recruitment\ncompany called Acurian Health tracks down people who look online\nfor information about their medical conditions, we discovered\nNaviStone’s code on sites run by Acurian, Quicken Loans, a\ncontinuing education center, a clothing store for plus-sized\nwomen, and a host of other retailers. Using Javascript, those\nsites were transmitting information from people as soon as they\ntyped or auto-filled it into an online form. That way, the company\nwould have it even if those people immediately changed their minds\nand closed the page. […]
\n\nWe decided to test how the code works by pretending to shop on\nsites that use it and then browsing away without finalizing the\npurchase. Three sites — hardware site Rockler.com, gift site\nCollectionsEtc.com, and clothing site BostonProper.com — sent us\nemails about items we’d left in our shopping carts using the email\naddresses we’d typed onto the site but had not formally submitted.\nAlthough Gizmodo was able to see the email address information\nbeing sent to Navistone, the company said that it was not\nresponsible for those emails.
\n
They weren’t responsible for sending the emails, but they were responsible for the email addresses being sent to those websites in the first place. Sending form data surreptitiously is morally wrong, and everyone knows it.
\n\nThis might sound hyperbolic, but I mean it: I think we’d be better off if JavaScript had never been added to web browsers.
\n\nChristopher Mims, in his column for The Wall Street Journal:
\n\n\n\n\nBut even when it steers through that thicket of crises, Uber will\nhave to come to grips with a fundamental vulnerability that is\nincreasingly apparent in the company’s business model. Uber may be\ngreat at technology, but unlike the businesses of Google,\nFacebook, Apple or Amazon, technology hasn’t proven to be a\nsignificant barrier to new entrants in ride-sharing. Across the\nglobe, Uber has dozens of competitors, and in many markets they\nhave grabbed the lion’s share of the ride-sharing market.
\n\nEven if Uber fixes all of its current problems, it’s increasingly\nunlikely that it can live up to the inflated expectations that\ncome with the nearly $70 billion valuation that have made it the\nworld’s most valuable startup. There are barbarians at Uber’s\ngate, and it’s sorely in need of a moat.
\n
This is why they’re pursuing self-driving technology so aggressively. There’s simply no way that Uber is worth $70 billion without some sort of exclusive technical advantage. That’s the interesting flip side to Kalanick’s ouster — I’m not sure who would want the job.
\n\nChris Lattner has updated his resume with his accomplishments at Tesla. Unsurprisingly, it sounds like he got a lot done in just five months — including, ironically, addressing an engineering talent retention problem.
\n\nMike Isaac, reporting for The New York Times:
\n\n\n\n\nTravis Kalanick’s final hours as Uber’s chief executive played out\nin a private room in a downtown Chicago hotel on Tuesday.
\n\nThere, Mr. Kalanick, who was on a trip to interview executive\ncandidates for Uber, was paid a surprise visit. Two venture\ncapitalists — Matt Cohler and Peter Fenton of the Silicon Valley\nfirm Benchmark, which is one of Uber’s biggest shareholders —\npresented Mr. Kalanick with a list of demands, including his\nresignation before the end of the day. The letter was from five of\nUber’s major investors, including Benchmark and the mutual fund\ngiant Fidelity Investments. […]
\n\nBy the end of the day, after hours of haggling and arguing, that\ncourse was clear: Mr. Kalanick agreed to step down as Uber’s chief\nexecutive.
\n
Truly great reporting from Isaac, including the fact that even during his brief “leave of absence”, he wasn’t really absent at all:
\n\n\n\n\nIn reality, Mr. Kalanick had little intention of staying away from\nhis company. Almost immediately after announcing the leave of\nabsence, he worked the phones to push out Mr. Bonderman for making\nthe sexist comment onstage at an Uber employee meeting. With the\ntwo increasingly at odds, Mr. Kalanick sent out a flurry of texts,\nphone calls and emails to his allies to pressure Mr. Bonderman to\nstep down from Uber’s board. Hours later, Mr. Bonderman did.
\n
Sarah Laskow, writing for Atlas Obscura:
\n\n\n\n\nThe last installment of the original “Choose Your Own Adventure”\nseries came out in 1998, but since 2004, Chooseco, founded by\none of the series’ original authors, R.A. Montgomery, has been\nrepublishing classic volumes, as well as new riffs on the form of\ninteractive fiction that seemed ubiquitous in the 1980s and ’90s.\nThe new editions also carry an additional feature — maps of the\nhidden structure of each book.
\n
Just looking at the maps included in the article, it’s interesting how wildly varying in complexity these stories were. See also: Christian Swinehart’s color-coded graphical representations of these books.
\n\n(Via Kottke.)
\n\nThe Computer History Museum (now on YouTube):
\n\n\n\n\nMuseum Historian John Markoff moderates a discussion with former\niPhone team members Hugo Fiennes, Nitin Ganatra and Scott Herz,\nfollowed by a conversation with Scott Forstall.
\n
Fascinating stories.
\n\nForstall was great. It’s hard to believe he’s been out of Apple and out of the limelight for 5 years — watching him on stage with Markoff it feels like he never left.
\n\nKara Swisher on Travis Kalanick:
\n\n\n\n\nUber confirmed the resignation, and the company’s board issued a\nstatement that said, in part: “Travis has always put Uber first.\nThis is a bold decision and a sign of his devotion and love for\nUber.” (For those who don’t speak fluent tech director, there are\nfour things in those two sentences that are not true.)
\n
Mike Isaac, reporting for The New York Times:
\n\n\n\n\nIn the letter, titled “Moving Uber Forward” and obtained by The\nNew York Times, the investors wrote to Mr. Kalanick that he must\nimmediately leave and that the company needed a change in\nleadership. Mr. Kalanick, 40, consulted with at least one Uber\nboard member, and after long discussions with some of the\ninvestors, he agreed to step down. He will remain on Uber’s board\nof directors.
\n\n“I love Uber more than anything in the world and at this difficult\nmoment in my personal life I have accepted the investors request\nto step aside so that Uber can go back to building rather than be\ndistracted with another fight,” Mr. Kalanick said in a statement.
\n
From the outside, it seems like this was inevitable. It was only a question of when.
\n\nChris Lattner:
\n\n\n\n\nTurns out that Tesla isn’t a good fit for me after all. I’m interested to hear about interesting roles for a seasoned engineering leader!
\n
That was quick — he was only hired 5 months ago.
\n\nCreated for discerning Medium.com writers and publishers, it’s the first dedicated desktop publishing client on the Mac App Store. Featured Worldwide on release, it’s the last writing, blogging, and note-taking app you’ll need.
\n\nFunctional and fun yet mnml af. 🤔 😆 🔥
\n\nWilliam Turton has quite a scoop for The Outline:
\n\n\n\n\nA recording of an internal briefing at Apple earlier this month\nobtained by The Outline sheds new light on how far the most\nvaluable company in the world will go to prevent leaks about new\nproducts. […]
\n\nThe briefing, which offers a revealing window into the company’s\nobsession with secrecy, was the first of many Apple is planning to\nhost for employees. In it, Rice and Freedman speak candidly about\nApple’s efforts to prevent leaks, discuss how previous leakers got\ncaught, and take questions from the approximately 100 attendees.
\n
There’s some irony in a leaked recording of an internal briefing on stopping leaks.
\n\nThis is news to me:
\n\n\n\n\nHowever, Rice says, Apple has cracked down on leaks from its\nfactories so successfully that more breaches are now happening on\nApple’s campuses in California than its factories abroad. “Last\nyear was the first year that Apple [campuses] leaked more than the\nsupply chain,” Rice tells the room. “More stuff came out of Apple\n[campuses] last year than all of our supply chain combined.” […]
\n\nIn the years since Tim Cook pledged to double down on secrecy,\nRice’s team has gotten better at safeguarding enclosures. “In 2014\nwe had 387 enclosures stolen,” he says. “In 2015 we had 57\nenclosures stolen, 50 of which were stolen on the night of\nannounce, which was so painful.” In 2016, Rice says the company\nproduced 65 million housings, and only four were stolen. “So it’s\nabout a one in 16 million loss ratio, which is unheard of in the\nindustry.”
\n
There’s a short (15 minute) podcast that accompanies the report, with Turton and The Outline’s Adrianne Jeffries. It’s worth a listen. (It doesn’t seem possible to link directly to a single episode of their podcast, so here’s a direct link for Overcast users.)
\n\nNew episode of my podcast, The Talk Show, with special guest Serenity Caldwell. We look back at WWDC 2017 — iOS 11, the new iPad Pro models, MacOS 10.13 “High Sierra”, updated Mac hardware and a tease at the upcoming iMac Pro, where Apple might go with VR and AR, San Jose as the venue for the event itself, and more.
\n\nSponsored by:
\n\nMedium seems to continue to grow in popularity as a publishing platform, and as it does, I’m growing more and more frustrated by their on-screen “engagement” turds. Every Medium site displays an on-screen “sharing” bar that covers the actual content I want to read. This is particularly annoying on the phone, where screen real estate is most precious. Now on iOS they’ve added an “Open in App” button that literally makes the last 1-2 lines of content on screen unreadable. To me these things are as distracting as having someone wave their hand in front of my face while I try to read.
\n\nHere’s an annotated screenshot (and threaded rant) I posted to Twitter while trying to read Steven Sinofksy’s WWDC 2017 trip report on my iPad Pro review unit last week.
\n\nSafari already has a built-in Sharing button. It has all the options for sharing I need. And as I scroll the page, it disappears so that I can see as much text on screen as possible. Safari is designed to be reader-friendly, as it should be. But it’s trivial to get that Sharing button back when I want it – just tap the bottom of the screen and there it is. Easy.
\n\nThis is now a very common design pattern for mobile web layouts. Medium is far from alone. It’s getting hard to find a news site that doesn’t put a persistent sharing dickbar down there.
\n\nMore examples:
\n\nTechCrunch’s waste of space deserves special mention, for having a persistent navbar at the top and a persistent ad, in addition to their sharing dickbar.
\n\nI’m sure “engagement” does register higher with these sharing dickbars, but I suspect a big part of that is because of accidental taps. And even so, what is more important, readability or “engagement”? Medium wants to be about readability but that’s hard to square with this dickbar, and especially hard to square with the “Open in App” button floating above it.
\n\niOS also has a standard way to prompt users to install the app version of a website — Smart App Banners. And it’s user-dismissible.
\n\nFor any piece over a page long, I read Medium pieces with Safari’s Reader Mode. Medium is supposed to be a reader-optimized layout by default. It should be one of the sites where you’re never even tempted to switch to Reader Mode.
\n\nI’m frustrated by this design pattern everywhere I see it. But I’m especially disappointed by Medium’s adoption of it. I don’t expect better from most websites. I do expect better from Medium.
\n\nA website should not fight the browser. Let the browser provide the chrome, and simply provide the content. Web developers know this is right — these dickbars are being rammed down their throats by SEO experts. The SEO folks are the same dopes who came up with the genius strategy of requiring 5-10 megabytes of privacy-intrusive CPU-intensive JavaScript on every page load that slows down websites. Now they come to their teams and say, “Our pages are too slow — we gotta move to AMP so our pages load fast.”
\n\nI don’t expect to break through to the SEO shitheads running the asylums at most of these publications, but Medium is supposed to be good. When people click a URL and see that it’s a Medium site, their reaction should be “Oh, good, a Medium site — this will be nice to read.” Right now it’s gotten to the point where when people realize an article is on Medium, they think, “Oh, crap, it’s on Medium.”
\n\n\n\n " + }, + { + "title" : "Microsoft Surface Laptop Teardown", + "date_published" : "2017-06-19T19:43:57Z", + "date_modified" : "2017-06-19T20:07:54Z", + "id" : "https://daringfireball.net/linked/2017/06/19/surface-laptop-ifixit", + "url" : "https://daringfireball.net/linked/2017/06/19/surface-laptop-ifixit", + "external_url" : "https://www.ifixit.com/Teardown/Microsoft+Surface+Laptop+Teardown/92915", + "author" : { + "name" : "John Gruber" + }, + "content_html" : "\niFixit gave the Surface Laptop a 0 out of 10 on their “Repairability Score”. The lowest anything from Apple has ever gotten is a 1, I believe.
\n\n\n\n\nVerdict: The Surface Laptop is not a laptop. It’s a glue-filled\nmonstrosity. There is nothing about it that is upgradable or\nlong-lasting, and it literally can’t be opened without destroying\nit. (Show us the procedure, Microsoft, we’d love to be wrong.)
\n
iFixit’s point of view on this is logical, and they’re certainly not alone in wishing for the good old days of user-accessible and user-upgradeable components. But it’s silly to argue that the Surface Laptop is “not a laptop” only because it’s a sealed box. It’s like saying the iPhone is not a phone because it doesn’t have a replaceable battery.
\n\nUpdate: Apple’s AirPods got a 0/10 from iFixit. That just goes to show how little correlation there is between iFixit’s concept of repairability and whether a product is good or not. I consider AirPods to be Apple’s best new product in years.
\n\nStandard Ebooks:
\n\n\n\n\nStandard Ebooks is a volunteer driven, not-for-profit project\nthat produces lovingly formatted, open source, and free public\ndomain ebooks.
\n\nEbook projects like Project Gutenberg transcribe ebooks and\nmake them available for the widest number of reading devices.\nStandard Ebooks takes ebooks from sources like Project\nGutenberg, formats and typesets them using a carefully designed\nand professional-grade style guide, lightly modernizes them,\nfully proofreads and corrects them, and then builds them to\ntake advantage of state-of-the-art ereader and browser\ntechnology. […]
\n\nOther free ebooks don’t put much effort into professional-quality\ntypography: they use "straight" quotes instead of “curly” quotes,\nthey ignore details like em- and en-dashes, and they look more\nlike early-90’s web pages instead of actual books.
\n\nThe Standard Ebooks project applies a rigorous and modern\ntypography manual when developing each and every ebook to ensure\nthey meet a professional-grade and consistent typographical\nstandard. Our ebooks look good.
\n
What a fantastic project. Project Gutenberg is an amazing library, but their books are a mess typographically. (Via Daniel Bogan.)
\n\nRandy Nelson, writing for the Sensor Tower blog:
\n\n\n\n\nAccording to Sensor Tower’s analysis of App Intelligence,\nthe total space required by the top 10 most installed U.S. iPhone\napps has grown from 164 MB in May 2013 to about 1.8 GB last month,\nan 11× or approximately 1,000 percent increase in just four years.\nIn the following report, we delve deeper into which apps have\ngrown the most.
\n
Apple really needs to do something about this. It’s not just that these apps are too big, but some of them issue software updates every week (or even more frequently). It’s a huge waste of bandwidth, time, and on-device storage space.
\n\nDani Deahl writing for The Verge:
\n\n\n\n\nAt long last, the perfect score for arcade classic Ms. Pac-Man has\nbeen achieved, though not by a human. Maluuba — a deep learning\nteam acquired by Microsoft in January — has created an AI system\nthat’s learned how to reach the game’s maximum point value of\n999,900 on Atari 2600, using a unique combination of reinforcement\nlearning with a divide-and-conquer method.
\n
Unlike the notoriously bad 2600 port of Pac-Man, the Ms. Pac-Man port was both fun and true to the spirit of the coin-op.
\n\nBrad Ellis:
\n\n\n\n\nAs devices change, our visual language changes with them. It’s\ntime to move away from the navbar in favor of navigation within\nthumb-reach. For the purposes of this article, we’ll call that\nReach Navigation.
\n
This design trend is clearly already underway, and Ellis does a terrific job explaining why it’s a good idea.
\n\nI can think of a few factors that led to the original iPhone having a top-of-the-screen UI for navigation. First, at just 3.5 inches diagonally, the whole screen was reachable. But another factor might be as simple as the fact that “navigation” was always at the top on desktops — window titles and controls have always been at the top on Mac and Windows. The iPhone didn’t use windows, per se, but there was a certain familiarity with having the titles and controls like Back/Close/Done buttons at the top. Something like the iOS 10 bottom-heavy design of Apple Maps is wholly different from a desktop UI design — as it should be.
\n\nGreat piece by Ben Thompson on Amazon’s intended acquisition of Whole Foods:
\n\n\n\n\nAs Mackey surely understood, this meant that AmazonFresh was at a\ncost disadvantage to physical grocers as well: in order to be\ncompetitive AmazonFresh needed to stock a lot of perishable items;\nhowever, as long as AmazonFresh was not operating at meaningful\nscale a huge number of those perishable items would spoil. And,\ngiven the inherent local nature of groceries, scale needed to be\nachieved not on a national basis but a city one.
\n\nGroceries are a fundamentally different problem that need a\nfundamentally different solution; what is so brilliant about this\ndeal, though, is that it solves the problem in a fundamentally\nAmazonian way.
\n
Mitchel Broussard:
\n\n\n\n\nAt WWDC this year, Apple senior vice president of software\nengineering Craig Federighi performed a demo of the company’s new\naugmented reality platform, ARKit, while mentioning popular\nfurniture company IKEA as an upcoming partner in the technology.\nSimilarly, Apple CEO Tim Cook referenced an Ikea AR partnership in\na recent interview with Bloomberg Businessweek.
\n\nNow, Ikea executive Michael Valdsgaard has spoken about the\ncompany’s partnership with Apple and ARKit, describing an all-new\naugmented reality app that will help customers make “reliable\nbuying decisions” for Ikea’s big ticket items.
\n
Very cool idea — probably the sort of thing that’s going to be common soon. I’m curious how much of a leg up ARKit will give iOS on this front.
\n\nMy thanks to Squarespace for sponsoring last week’s DF RSS feed. Squarespace handles everything related to creating, hosting, and maintaining a website, including domain name registration.
\n\nBuying a domain from Squarespace is quick, simple, and fun. Search for the domain you want, or type any word or phrase into the search field and Squarespace will suggest some great options. Every domain comes with a beautiful, ad-free parking page, WHOIS Privacy, and a 2048-bit SSL certificate to secure your website — all at no additional cost. Once you lock down your domain, create a beautiful website with one of Squarespace’s award-winning templates. Try Squarespace for free. When you’re ready to subscribe, get 10% off at squarespace.com with offer code “DARING17”.
\n\nThis is a fun challenge.
\n\nBlockbuster event next week at the Computer History Museum in Mountain View:
\n\n\n\n\nHow did iPhone come to be? On June 20, four members of the\noriginal development team will discuss the secret Apple project,\nwhich in the past decade has remade the computer industry, changed\nthe business landscape, and become a tool in the hands of more\nthan a billion people around the world.
\n\nPart 1: Original iPhone Engineers Nitin Ganatra, Scott Herz, and\nHugo Fiennes in Conversation with John Markoff
\n\nPart 2: Original iPhone Software Team Leader Scott Forstall in\nConversation with John Markoff
\n
It kills me that I can’t make this. Hopefully there will be video.
\n\nHere’s the thing: Forstall was obviously a divisive figure inside Apple. He saw himself as an indispensable man after Steve Jobs died, and it turns out he wasn’t.
\n\nBut there can be no dispute that Forstall led one of the most successful software projects ever undertaken. It’s a cliche to say that they achieved the impossible, but what Forstall’s team achieved was considered by many — including many of the members of the team — impossible. But they did it, and in the ensuing years they kept making iOS better and better. It’s not just that they managed to ship the original iPhone OS in June 2007, but the entire run up through Forstall’s ouster from the company was simply amazing.
\n\nAcross the company, it’s clear that Forstall’s style was not popular. But I know many people who worked on his iOS team, and most of them loved working for him, or at the very least appreciated working for him. The thing I’ve heard over and over is that Forstall was incredibly demanding, yes, but if you were on his team and did good work he had your back.
\n\nForstall pretty much hasn’t said a damn thing about Apple since he left the company five years ago. So if he opens up at all to Markoff, this could be fascinating. His team’s story about actually implementing the original iPhone remains largely untold.
\n\nNilay Patel, announcing a special episode of The Vergecast with The One Device author Brian Merchant:
\n\n\n\n\nAnd, of course, we talk about the quotes from Tony Fadell and\nBrett Bilbrey in the excerpt we just published, in which Fadell\ntells a story about Phil Schiller arguing the iPhone should have a\nhardware keyboard. Schiller has said the story isn’t true, and\nFadell has tried to walk it back as well.
\n\n“So I wasn’t in the room at Apple 10, 15 years ago when this would\nhave happened,” says Merchant, who has the exchange on tape. “But\nthis is a quote verbatim as Tony Fadell who was in the room told\nit to me. He told me this quote in such detail and he gave such a\nvivid account, and I had no reason to believe it was untrue.”
\n\nMerchant says the controversy has “blown him away.”
\n
I figured Merchant had Fadell’s interview recorded. The quotes were too extensive not to have been recorded. It’s pretty clear what happened: Fadell told Merchant exactly what he’s quoted as saying, but now that he’s seen how it’s playing out, he wants to walk it back. It’s a little late for that.
\n\nFederico Viticci, MacStories, “The 10.5-inch iPad Pro: Future-Proof”:
\n\n\n\n\nA good way to think about the iPad’s new display with ProMotion\nis not the difference between low-res and Retina screens, but\nthe jump from 30fps to 60fps. You see more of every animation.\nText is more legible when you scroll and doesn’t judder. It’s\nhard to explain and it has to be seen and experienced to be\nfully understood. Every scroll, page transition, and app launch\nanimation on the 10.5″ iPad Pro is absurdly smooth to the point\nof feeling unrealistic at first — hence the common reaction\nthat something doesn’t quite compute. But as you spend some time\nwith the new iPad and start using it on a daily basis, its\ndisplay becomes normal and you wish that other Apple displays\nwere the same.
\n\nI’m not even a week into my tests with the 10.5″ iPad Pro, and\nI think scrolling on my first-gen 12.9″ iPad Pro looks choppy\nnow. I’d be surprised if 120Hz displays with ProMotion don’t\nexpand to the iPhone later this year and other Apple computers\nin the future. The combination of hardware and software really\nis that good.
\n
Last year when True Tone was introduced with the 9.7-inch iPad Pro, Phil Schiller said something to the effect of “Once you get used to True Tone, you can’t go back.” I optimistically took that as a sign that the iPhone 7 would have True Tone. It did not, and the reason is probably that True Tone requires additional hardware sensors on the front face to pick up the ambient light temperature, and the iPhone has less room for additional sensors. But with ProMotion, I’m really hopeful that it’ll make its way into this year’s new iPhones. ProMotion doesn’t require additional sensors — only a super-fast GPU (which the iPhone will have) and intricate software support in iOS (which work Apple has already done for the iPad Pro).
\n\nAnyway, it’s really hard to quote just one bit from Viticci’s review. If you only thoroughly read one review of the new iPad Pro, it should be his. Nobody outside Apple cares as much about iPad as he does.
\n\nMatthew Panzarino, TechCrunch, “Apple Pays Off Its Future-of-Computing Promise With iPad Pro”:
\n\n\n\n\nAfter playing with the new iPad Pro 10.5” for a few days, I am\nconvinced that it’s fairly impossible to do a detailed review of\nit in its current state.
\n\nNot because there is some sort of flaw, but because it was clearly\ndesigned top to bottom as an empty vessel in which to pour iOS 11.
\n\nEvery feature, every hardware advancement, every piece of\nunderstated technical acrobatics is in the service of making\nApple’s next-generation software shine.
\n
Dieter Bohn, The Verge, “iPad Pro 10.5 Review: Overkill”:
\n\n\n\n\nI was all set to complain that increasing the size from 9.7 to\n10.5 was not a big enough jump to justify requiring people to buy\nnew keyboards and accessories. Then I started typing on the\non-screen keyboard and on the new hardware Smart Keyboard. Even\nthough I’m dubious about Apple’s claim that the software keyboard\nis “full size”, I find the slight size increase makes touch typing\nmuch easier. It’s still a little cramped, but it’s much easier to\nbounce between this and a real keyboard now.
\n
It really does make a difference in typing, and no practical difference at all in terms of holdability.
\n\nBohn again:
\n\n\n\n\nTo me, if you’re going to spend $650 on a computer, it should\nalmost surely be your main computer. And if you’re going to make\nthe iPad Pro your main computer, you should probably get more than\n64GB of storage and you should also probably get a keyboard to go\nwith it (to say nothing of the Apple Pencil). It hits the $1,000\nmark very quickly.
\n
I don’t agree with the notion that a $650 computer should be your “main computer” at all. Apple stuff isn’t for the budget-conscious — news at 11.
\n\nBrian X. Chen, The New York Times, “New iPad Pro Inches Toward Replacing PC, but Falls Short”:
\n\n\n\n\nFive years later, Mr. Jobs’s successor, Timothy D. Cook, took the\niPad a step further. Unveiling the iPad Pro, a souped-up tablet\nthat worked with Apple’s keyboard and stylus, he remarked that\npeople would try the product and “conclude they no longer need to\nuse anything else, other than their phones.”
\n\nThat prediction has not appeared to come true. Many professionals\nsay they use an iPad in addition to a personal computer, and sales\nof iPads have shrunk quarter after quarter for more than a year,\nan indication that hordes of people were not trading in their PCs\nfor tablets just yet.
\n\nThat situation is unlikely to change with Apple’s newest iPad Pro,\nwhich will be released this week. […] But after about a week of\ntesting the 10.5-inch iPad Pro, I concluded that Apple’s\nprofessional tablet still suffers from some of the same problems\nwhen compared with a laptop.
\n
That’s a slanted truncation of Cook’s quote. Cook’s full quote: “Yes, the iPad Pro is a replacement for a notebook or a desktop for many, many people. They will start using it and conclude they no longer need to use anything else, other than their phones.” Chen’s truncation makes it sound like Cook claimed the iPad Pro was a Mac or Windows replacement for everyone. He didn’t. And the fact that the new iPad Pro debuted alongside new MacBooks, MacBook Pros, and even more-megahertz-in-the-box MacBook Airs shows that Apple doesn’t think so either. Update: And I completely forgot to mention the solid updates to the iMacs and the announcement of the iMac Pro.
\n\n“I prefer a laptop to an iPad Pro” is very different from “A laptop is better than an iPad Pro”. Me, personally, I much prefer working on a MacBook Pro to an iPad Pro. But I can see why others feel the opposite. That’s the whole point of Apple’s strategy of keeping them separate, rather than unifying them Microsoft Surface-style.
\n\niPad’s slowly diminishing sales are a real thing. But I don’t think that can be used as a gauge for whether more and more people are using an iPad as their main computer. And iPad sales are still more than double those of the Mac. There’s no reason to doubt that “many, many people” are concluding they no longer need a Mac or PC.
\n\nAndrew Cunningham, Ars Technica, “The 10.5-Inch iPad Pro Is Much More “Pro” Than What It Replaces”:
\n\n\n\n\nOf all the computers Apple sells, none of them has screens that do\nquite as much stuff as the iPad Pros are doing.
\n\nThat list starts with DCI-P3 color gamut support (new in the\n12.9-inch Pro, returning to the smaller one) and an\nanti-reflective coating, features also present in recent iMacs and\nMacBook Pros. But the True Tone feature, which detects the color\ntemperature of the ambient light, adjusts the display’s color\ntemperature to match. Most significantly, the iPad’s refresh rate\nhas been bumped up to 120Hz, twice the normal 60Hz. The screens in\nthe iPad Pros are the best screens Apple ships, which is\nappropriate for a thing that’s just a giant screen by design.
\n\nThe 10.5-inch Pro has a 2224×1668 screen, up just a little bit\nfrom the 2048×1536 in 9.7-inch iPads. The density is identical, so\nphotos and text are exactly the same size they were before; you\ncan just fit a bit more of them on-screen at once.
\n
That’s important to note. There was some clever speculation by Dan Provost a few months ago that the 10.5-inch iPad would have the same pixel dimensions as the 12.9-inch iPad Pro, with a higher pixels-per-inch density. That’s what Apple did with the iPad Mini. The problem with that speculation is that while the math worked out, the size of things on screen would not. Everything would be shrunk by 20 percent. Not everyone’s eyes can handle that. That’s fine for the Mini — which is often used by sharp-eyed children — but not fine for the standard size iPad.
\n\nI had been thinking that maybe what Apple would do is what Provost suggested, but offer a choice between standard and zoomed mode like the Plus-sized iPhones do. Nope. I think what they’ve done is better though, because I think a scaled “zoomed” interface would look blurry at just 324 ppi. The iPhone Plus displays have a resolution of 401 ppi.
\n\nHarry McCracken, Fast Company, “A Better Window Into The World Of Apps”:
\n\n\n\n\n\n\n " + }, + { + "title" : "★ The Knives Come Out for Phil Schiller in Brian Merchant’s ‘The One Device: The Secret History of the iPhone’", + "date_published" : "2017-06-13T20:46:25Z", + "date_modified" : "2017-06-13T23:15:31Z", + "id" : "https://daringfireball.net/2017/06/the_knives_come_out_for_schiller", + "url" : "https://daringfireball.net/2017/06/the_knives_come_out_for_schiller", + "author" : { + "name" : "John Gruber" + }, + "content_html" : "\nYou can suss out a lot about Apple’s priorities from the aspects\nof a product it leaves alone and the ones it never stops\nobsessing over.
\n\nConsider the iPad. Every generation of Apple’s tablet since the\nfirst one in 2010 has had the same stated battery life–“up to 10\nhours”–which suggests that the company thinks that shooting for\nanything in excess of that would be wasted effort.
\n\nThat 2010 iPad weighed a pound and a half, and felt a bit hefty in\nthe hand. With 2013’s iPad Air, Apple whittled that down to about\na pound. And there the mid-sized iPads have stayed,\nweight-reduction mission accomplished.
\n\nHowever, when it comes to the iPad’s display, Apple has never been\nsatisfied to rest on its technological laurels.
\n
The Verge has an exclusive (and lengthy) excerpt from Brian Merchant’s The One Device: The Secret History of the iPhone, which comes out next week. Merchant seemingly has many first-hand sources on the record, including Tony Fadell and perhaps Scott Forstall. (I say “perhaps” because it’s not clear from the excerpt whether Forstall spoke to Merchant, or if Merchant got the Forstall quotes from somewhere else. It seems like there should be a lot more from Forstall in this story if he actually talked to Merchant.)
\n\nBut Fadell spoke to Merchant extensively, including this shot at Phil Schiller:
\n\n\n\n\nThe iPod phone was losing support. The executives debated which\nproject to pursue, but Phil Schiller, Apple’s head of marketing,\nhad an answer: Neither. He wanted a keyboard with hard buttons.\nThe BlackBerry was arguably the first hit smartphone. It had an\nemail client and a tiny hard keyboard. After everyone else,\nincluding Fadell, started to agree that multitouch was the way\nforward, Schiller became the lone holdout.
\n\nHe “just sat there with his sword out every time, going, ‘No,\nwe’ve got to have a hard keyboard. No. Hard keyboard.’ And he\nwouldn’t listen to reason as all of us were like, ‘No, this works\nnow, Phil.’ And he’d say, ‘You gotta have a hard keyboard!’”\nFadell says.
\n
I don’t know if it’s true or not that Schiller was singlehandedly pushing for a Blackberry-style keyboard. But even if true, it only looks foolish in hindsight, especially if this argument took place before the iPhone’s software team had come up with a proof-of-concept software keyboard. Today it’s clear that the iPhone needed a good keyboard, and that a touchscreen keyboard can be a good keyboard. Neither of those things was obvious in 2005. And in the context of this story, it’s clear that at the time of this purported argument, Steve Jobs and Apple weren’t yet sure if the iPhone should be a pocket-sized personal computer or a consumer electronics product that would have no more need for a keyboard (hardware or software) than an iPod did. My guess is that Schiller was insisting that the iPhone needed to be a personal computer, not a mere gadget, and it wasn’t unreasonable to believe a software keyboard wouldn’t be good enough. For chrissakes there were critics who insisted that the iPhone’s software keyboard wasn’t good enough for years after the iPhone actually shipped.
\n\nI do know that Schiller’s hard-charging, brusque style and his obvious political acumen have made him a lot of enemies over the years. It sounds like Fadell is one of them.
\n\nSo I’ll just say this: this story about Phil Schiller pushing for a hardware keyboard comes from one source (so far — if anyone out there can back that up, my window is always open for little birdies), and that one source is the guy who admittedly spent over a year working on iPhone prototypes with a click wheel interface.
\n\nThen there’s this:
\n\n\n\n\nSchiller didn’t have the same technological acumen as many of the\nother execs. “Phil is not a technology guy,” Brett Bilbrey, the\nformer head of Apple’s Advanced Technology Group, says. “There\nwere days when you had to explain things to him like a\ngrade-school kid.” Jobs liked him, Bilbrey thinks, because he\n“looked at technology like middle America does, like Grandma and\nGrandpa did.”
\n
Hats off to Bilbrey for putting his name on this quote, but having spoken to Schiller both on- and off-the-record many times, the idea that he “looks at technology … like Grandma and Grandpa did” and needs things explained to him “like a grade-school kid” is bullshit. Especially off-the-record, Schiller can drill down on technical details to a surprising degree. I don’t know what Schiller did to piss off Bilbrey, but Bilbrey either has a huge chip on his shoulder or was severely misquoted by Merchant.1
\n\nAnyway, I sure wish this book excerpt had come out before my live episode of The Talk Show last week — now I do have one more question I wish I’d gotten to ask Schiller.
\n\nHere’s a story from Yoni Heisler for Network World on Brett Bilbrey’s retirement from Apple in 2014. Bilbrey headed Apple’s Technology Advancement Group. Merchant describes Bilbrey as having led “Apple’s Advanced Technology Group”. It’s a small detail, and the names are clearly similar, but the Advanced Technology Group was Larry Tesler’s R&D division at Apple, from 1986-1997. It was among the numerous divisions and products that Steve Jobs shitcanned after he rejoined the company. ↩︎
\nI’ve spent the last week using a new 10.5-inch iPad Pro, and this is, in many ways, the easiest product review I’ve ever written. There are several significant improvements to the hardware, and no tradeoffs or downsides. There is no “but”.
\n\nDisplay: The new iPad Pros have the best displays of any computer I’ve ever seen. True Tone plus ProMotion is simply terrific. (The first generation 12.9-inch iPad Pro didn’t have True Tone; with these new models, the only noticeable difference between the 12.9- and 10.5-inch models is the size.) You really do have to see the 120 Hz refresh rate in person — and play with it while scrolling content on screen — to get it. You can actually read text as it’s moving during a scroll. It’s not as significant as the jump from non-retina to retina, but it’s in that ballpark.
Pencil: The latency of the Apple Pencil on a first-generation iPad Pro is the best I had ever seen for any stylus on any device at any price. The latency of the Apple Pencil on the new iPad Pro is so much better — so much closer to ink-on-paper imperceptibility — that you have to try it to believe it. It’s the one thing that really makes the first-gen iPad Pro feel “slow”.
Size: The increase in size is perfect. The footprint for a “regular” iPad has, until now, remained unchanged since the original iPad in 2010. That 9.7-inch display size was nearly perfect. This 10.5-inch display size is better though. Apple said during the keynote that typing on the on-screen keyboard is surprisingly better given just a bit more room, and I agree. And typing on the Smart Keyboard cover is way better than on last year’s 9.7-inch iPad Pro. In hand it doesn’t feel bigger at all. It feels like there were no trade-offs whatsoever in increasing the display size and overall device footprint. Part of that is because the weight has remained completely unchanged. I have had zero problems — not one — with the decreased bezel area. Apple’s inadvertent touch detection game is on point.
Battery: Battery life is great, as expected.
Performance: Apple’s in-house chip team continues to amaze. No one buys an iPad because of CPU benchmarks, but the new iPad Pro’s CPU performance is mind-boggling. Forget about comparisons to the one-port MacBook — the iPad Pro blows that machine out of the water performance-wise. The astounding thing is that the new iPad Pro holds its own against the MacBook Pro in single-core performance — around 3,900 on the Geekbench 4 benchmark for the iPad Pro vs. around 4,200–4,400 for the various configurations of 13- and 15-inch MacBook Pros.1 Multi-core performance has effectively doubled from the first generation of iPad Pro. That sort of year-over-year increase just doesn’t happen anymore, but here we are. The new iPad Pro gets a multi-core Geekbench 4 score of around 9200; the brand-new Core M3-based MacBook gets a multi-core score of around 6800. Again, this isn’t why people buy iPads — the iPad took off like a rocket in 2010 back when it was way slower (way way way slower) than even the slowest MacBook — but I think it is vastly underappreciated just how significantly Apple’s chip team is pulling ahead of the industry, especially Intel.2
All that said, the real story of these new iPad Pro models can’t be told today, because that story is iOS 11. I think iOS 11’s iPad-focused features are the entire reason why Apple waited until WWDC to unveil them. They could have held an event for them back in April, when they released the new starting-at-just-$329 9.7-inch iPad, but if they did, the only new software they could have demoed was Clips. I love Clips, but it’s just a fun little tool and doesn’t show off anything particular to iPad compared to iPhone.
\n\nAgain, the new iPad Pro hardware is almost too good to be true, but the iPad story Apple unveiled last week is iOS 11.
\n\nIt’s not fair to review a product running a developer beta of the OS — let alone the first (and generally buggiest) beta. So let’s stop the “review” right here: the new iPad Pros running iOS 10.3.2 are the best iPads ever made. You shouldn’t hesitate to buy one today, and if you do get one now, you should wait until iOS 11 ships in the fall to upgrade, or at the very least wait for a non-developer public beta of iOS 11 this summer before upgrading.
\n\nBut if you are reckless enough to install the iOS 11 beta on the new iPad Pro? Holy smokes is this better. I used the iPad Pro for a full week with iOS 10.3.2 because that’s the product that’s shipping, but after upgrading to iOS 11 beta 1 this morning and using it to write this entire review,3 I’m just blown away by how much more useful this machine is, and how much easier it is to work with 5 or 6 apps at a time.
\n\nI would never recommend running a beta of any OS on any device that’s used for production purposes, so don’t take this as such, but for me personally, I can’t see going back to iOS 10.3.2 on any iPad that can handle it. It feels like a hand has been untied from behind my back, and this amazing hardware has finally been allowed to run free.
\n\nYou can browse Geekbench’s database of results for Mac and iOS. ↩︎
\nApple’s A10X chip is so high-performing that I think it’s put Apple in a slightly uncomfortable position marketing-wise. They can’t brag about it fully without making Intel (and by implication, their own MacBooks) look bad, and Intel remains an important partner for Apple. I don’t think it’s a coincidence that the most impressive iPad demo during the keynote (and the one that contained the most bragging about its performance compared to PCs) was done by a third-party developer — Ash Hewson of Serif, demonstrating Affinity Photo — not Greg Joswiak or anyone else from Apple. ↩︎︎
\nFull disclosure: I went back to my Mac to write these 3 footnotes. That’s due more to the byzantine way I mark up footnotes than any limitation inherent to iOS vs. MacOS. But it feels worth noting. ↩︎︎
\nGreat investigative piece by Johnny Lin looking into a top-10 highest grossing app named “Mobile protection :Clean & Security VPN” (punctuation and grammatical errors sic), from a developer named Ngan Vo Thi Thuy:
\n\n\n\n\n“Full Virus, Malware scanner”: What? I’m pretty sure it’s\nimpossible for any app to scan my iPhone for viruses or malware,\nsince third party apps are sandboxed to their own data, but let’s\nkeep reading…
\n\n“You will pay $99.99 for a 7-day subscription”
\n\nUhh… come again?
\n
There should be no “virus and malware” scanners in the App Store. None. iOS does not need anti-virus software. The App Store sandboxing rules mean that anti-virus software couldn’t really do anything useful anyway. And by allowing them to be listed on the store, it creates the false impression that Apple thinks you might need anti-virus software.
\n\nBut do-nothing anti-virus utilities that are scamming people into $100/week subscriptions? That’s downright criminal.
\n\nLin shows that “Mobile protection :Clean & Security VPN” is not alone. The productivity top-grossing list is riddled with similar scam apps.
\n\nGiven how many legitimate developers are still having problems getting their apps approved due to seemingly capricious App Store reviewer decisions, it’s doubly outrageous that these apps have made their way onto the store in the first place. These are the exact sort of apps that the App Store review process should be primarily looking to block.
\n\nAnd there is no excuse for Apple not having flagged them after the fact, once they started generating significant revenue. It’s downright mind boggling that this horrendous “Mobile protection :Clean & Security VPN” app made it all the way into the top 10 without getting flagged.
\n\nBased on Lin’s research, the pattern is simple:
\n\nApple needs to remove these apps from the App Store, and prevent such apps from getting into the store in the first place. They should reconsider the effects of allowing developers to buy their way to the top spot in search results. And they should police the top-grossing lists for apps that are pulling scams — the most important scams to catch are the successful ones.
\n\nLastly, every single dollar these apps have generated should be refunded to the victims of these scams.
\n\n\n\n " + }, + { + "title" : "★ Update on The Talk Show Live From WWDC 2017", + "date_published" : "2017-06-02T05:41:06Z", + "date_modified" : "2017-06-02T06:13:18Z", + "id" : "https://daringfireball.net/2017/06/update_on_the_talk_show_live_from_wwdc_2017", + "url" : "https://daringfireball.net/2017/06/update_on_the_talk_show_live_from_wwdc_2017", + "author" : { + "name" : "John Gruber" + }, + "content_html" : "\nOn Wednesday I put the first 500 tickets on sale for next week’s live show from WWDC. They sold out in 7 minutes.
\n\nThe California Theatre in San Jose has both an orchestra level and a balcony. That first bunch of tickets separated the two. After talking with the staff at the theater today, they recommended making all tickets general admission and allowing their ushers to fill the orchestra level first, and then direct remaining ticket holders to the balcony. So, all tickets, including those sold Wednesday, are now simply general admission. Everyone paid the same price, so I think this is fair, but I do apologize for any confusion. The theater is beautiful, and there are no bad seats.
\n\nThe next batch of tickets will go on sale today, Friday, at 1p ET/10a PT. Given what happened Wednesday, I expect them to sell out in a few minutes. I hate writing that because it sounds braggy, but I’m putting it out there just as fair warning. You’re going to have to act quick and maybe get lucky.
\n\nIf you want a ticket and wind up not getting one, there will be a live audio stream for everyone to listen to. This year we are not going to attempt to stream live video. Instead we’re going to work hard to get edited video of the event up on the web as soon as possible after the show is over. If you just can’t wait, listen to the live audio. If you want to see the show, wait for the video — it should be up some time on Wednesday at the latest.
\n\nIf you do get a ticket or already have one:
\n\nSponsored by:
+ +++ +Pundits have long suspected that two roadblocks stood in the way +of Apple becoming a carrier: the infrastructure is incredibly +expensive, even if you lease it from the larger carriers, and +Apple could limit the iPhone business if it were to compete with +the major carriers.
+ +But Apple has sidestepped those concerns by essentially taking +over a carrier (actually a carrier-owned MVNO — Mobile Virtual +Network Operator) without acquiring it. Apple may not own Virgin +Mobile, but Virgin Mobile is now utterly dependent on Apple and +will benefit through promotion in Apple Stores.
+ +We shouldn’t read too much into this deal, but at the very least +it’s unusual to see a company like Virgin Mobile going all-in on +the iPhone. And it might point toward Apple dipping its toe into +the MVNO business.
+
Virgin Mobile is owned by Sprint (and thus uses Sprint’s back-end), and in my experience Sprint is the worst of the U.S. carriers, so this is not a panacea. But it is intriguing.
+ +I’ve been using the developer betas on my 10.5-inch iPad Pro review unit and a spare iPhone. I’m willing to wait to install iOS 11 on my primary iPhone, but at this point, bugs be damned, I wouldn’t want to use an iPad running iOS 10.3. It’s stable enough, and the benefits of the great new features for iPad far outweigh the downsides of the beta (which, in addition to crashing bugs, include questionable battery life).
+ +++ +It has this wild new feature called Drop In. Drop In lets you give +people permission to automatically connect with your device. +Here’s how it works. Let’s say my father has activated Drop In for +me on his Echo Show. All I have to do is say, “Alexa, drop in on +Dad.” It then turns on the microphone and camera on my father’s +device and starts broadcasting that to me. For the several seconds +of the call, my father’s video screen would appear fogged over. +But then there he’ll be. And to be clear: This happens even if he +doesn’t answer. Unless he declines the call, audibly or by tapping +on the screen, it goes through. It just starts. Hello, you look +nice today.
+ +Honestly, I haven’t figured out what to think about this yet. But, +it’s here.
+
I know what to think of this: No fucking way do I want this.
+ +Update: I’ve already gotten a few reader responses arguing that this feature could be great for an Echo Show in the home of an elderly relative. You visit and set it up in their house, explain to them what it does, and then you can check in with them without their needing to do anything at all. I can see that. You can think of it as the digital equivalent of having a set of keys to someone’s house — something you’d only grant to a deeply trusted friend or loved one.
+ +++ +Starting on June 30, 2017, att.net customers will no longer be +able to log in to their Yahoo and Tumblr accounts through email +addresses with the following domains: att.net, ameritech.net, +bellsouth.net, flash.net, nvbell.net, pacbell.net, prodigy.net, +sbcglobal.net, snet.net, swbell.net, and wans.net.
+
The sheer egregiousness of this is outrageous on its face, but it’s even worse when you consider that Tumblr, when it was independent, was a champion for net neutrality.
+ +Update: TechCrunch says it’s just a deal expiring, not spite:
+ +++ +As part of the new corporate merger of Yahoo and Aol under the +Oath brand, it looks like Yahoo accounts will no longer be +accessible through AT&T email addresses (or those of any A&T +subsidiaries).
+ +The move provoked some uproar among net neutrality advocates, but +it seems to be less about creating walled gardens and more about +cleaning up prior commitments and pre-existing partnerships. +While there is a level of inconvenience for AT&T customers, this +is less about net neutrality and more about unwinding those +corporate deals.
+
I still say fuck Verizon and their stance on net neutrality.
+ +The brand new Timing fixes that. It automatically tracks which apps, documents and websites you use — without start/stop timers. See how you spend your time, eliminate distracting activities, and improve your client billing. Mind you, this data is super sensitive, so Timing keeps it safe on your Mac.
+ +Stop worrying about time and focus on doing your best work instead.
+ +Download a free 14-day trial today and get 10 percent off through next Monday.
+ +++ +“App thinning” is not a magic bullet that erases this problem +though, as Facebook Messenger, which shows as being 154 MB, still +downloaded 99 MB of data for its update. […]
+ +So are giant app sizes a problem? Yes. Do delta updates allow +these updates to use less data? Yes. Do delta updates make these +large apps a non-issue? Hell no!
+
++ +Amazon / Whole Foods will be the fourth-largest grocer in the US, +and will likely post growth rates no $10B+ retailer, sans Amazon, +has registered. The Seattle firm will apply its operational chops +and lower (zero) profit hurdle to the Whole Foods business model +and bring prices (way) down. If you wish you could shop at Whole +Foods more often, but it’s too expensive, your prayers have been +answered. Whole Foods will become the grocery equivalent of a +Mercedes for the price of a Toyota. Grocery has stuck their chin +out (little innovation), and the entire sector is about to have +its jaw shattered.
+
It’s a great piece. I disagree with him on this though:
+ +++ +Amazon will displace Apple as the top tech hardware innovator, +with Alexa cementing itself as the gadget that defines the decade +(post iPhone). Grocery / commerce via Alexa will create the +utility that Alexa needs to [maintain its lead] over Google and +Apple’s home / voice offerings as they try to play catch-up.
+
Alexa may well maintain its lead in the smart speaker market. It may even grow. Maybe HomePod will be a complete bust. But even if all of that happens, the smartphone will remain the dominant device in people’s lives. Something will eventually replace the phone, but smart speakers aren’t it.
+ +Hardware just isn’t where Amazon is good.
+ +++ +Google is stopping one of the most controversial advertising +formats: ads inside Gmail that scan users’ email contents. The +decision didn’t come from Google’s ad team, but from its cloud +unit, which is angling to sign up more corporate customers.
+ +Alphabet Inc.’s Google Cloud sells a package of office software, +called G Suite, that competes with market leader Microsoft Corp. +Paying Gmail users never received the email-scanning ads like the +free version of the program, but some business customers were +confused by the distinction and its privacy implications, said +Diane Greene, Google’s senior vice president of cloud. “What we’re +going to do is make it unambiguous,” she said.
+
This is terrific news. Not just because it’s a good policy change in and of itself, but I take it as a sign that Google’s leadership is starting to realize how much damage they’ve done to the company’s reputation by playing fast and loose with their users’ privacy.
+ +++ +Since the days of the NES, people have accused Nintendo of +intentionally underproducing hardware in order to drive an +artificial feeding frenzy of demand in the marketplace. With the +Nintendo Switch remaining nearly impossible to find at retailers +nationwide, those same accusations of “false scarcity” have been +bubbling up in certain corners.
+ +Nintendo Senior Director of Corporate Communications Charlie +Scibetta wants to push back on those accusations. “It’s definitely +not intentional in terms of shorting the market,” he told Ars in a +recent interview. “We’re making it as fast as we can. We want to +get as many units out as we can to support all the software that’s +coming out right now… our job really is to get it out as quick +as we can, especially for this holiday because we want to have +units on shelves to support Super Mario Odyssey.”
+
++ +Popular social networking apps are over 400 megs. With weekly +releases, over one year you’ll download twenty gigs of data.
+ +Since we launched Halide, the most unexpected compliment we’ve +heard is about its size. At 11 megs, we’ll push less data in one +year than a social network pushes in a single update.
+ +“So you aren’t using Swift,” asked a friend. After all, Swift +bundles its standard libraries into your app, bloating its size. +Halide is almost entirely Swift. How did we do it? Let’s start +with the technical bits.
+
His conclusion is spot-on:
+ +++ +There really is one weird trick to lose size: focus on your customers.
+
++ +This got me thinking — as a user who has a lot of apps +installed, how much bandwidth does my phone use to keep my apps +updated? […]
+ +One Friday I turned off auto-update for apps and let the update +queue build up for a week. The results shocked me.
+
It’s getting to the point where most apps can’t be updated over cellular because they’re all over 100 MB. This is madness.
+ +Update: Many readers have written to argue that the listed sizes in the App Store aren’t what you actually download when updating an app, thanks to app thinning and other features. OK, but even with app thinning and delta updates these apps are still way too big as downloads and take up way too much storage on devices.
+ +++ +More than one thousand current Uber employees have signed a letter +to the company’s board of directors, asking for the return of +deposed CEO Travis Kalanick “in an operational role.” One of its +venture capital investors also is chiming in, with a similar +message.
+
Not surprising to me at all — Uber was made in Kalanick’s image.
+ +++ +It was Lao Tzu who said that “the journey of a thousand miles +begins with a single step.”
+ +In the case of complete and utter change reeling through Uber +right now — culminating in the resignation of its once +untouchable CEO Travis Kalanick — it turns out that it began with +one of the most epic blog posts to be written about what happens +when a hot company becomes hostage to its increasingly +dysfunctional and toxic behaviors.
+ +It was clear from the moment you read the 3,000-word post by +former engineer Susan Fowler about her time at the car-hailing +company that nothing was going to be the same. Titled simply, +“Reflecting on one very, very strange year at Uber,” the +essay deftly and surgically laid out the map that the media and +others would use to prove to its out-to-lunch board and waffling +investors that Uber CEO Travis Kalanick had to go.
+
The truth and courage are a powerful combination.
+ +++ +During a recent investigation into how a drug-trial recruitment +company called Acurian Health tracks down people who look online +for information about their medical conditions, we discovered +NaviStone’s code on sites run by Acurian, Quicken Loans, a +continuing education center, a clothing store for plus-sized +women, and a host of other retailers. Using Javascript, those +sites were transmitting information from people as soon as they +typed or auto-filled it into an online form. That way, the company +would have it even if those people immediately changed their minds +and closed the page. […]
+ +We decided to test how the code works by pretending to shop on +sites that use it and then browsing away without finalizing the +purchase. Three sites — hardware site Rockler.com, gift site +CollectionsEtc.com, and clothing site BostonProper.com — sent us +emails about items we’d left in our shopping carts using the email +addresses we’d typed onto the site but had not formally submitted. +Although Gizmodo was able to see the email address information +being sent to Navistone, the company said that it was not +responsible for those emails.
+
They weren’t responsible for sending the emails, but they were responsible for the email addresses being sent to those websites in the first place. Sending form data surreptitiously is morally wrong, and everyone knows it.
+ +This might sound hyperbolic, but I mean it: I think we’d be better off if JavaScript had never been added to web browsers.
+ +++ +But even when it steers through that thicket of crises, Uber will +have to come to grips with a fundamental vulnerability that is +increasingly apparent in the company’s business model. Uber may be +great at technology, but unlike the businesses of Google, +Facebook, Apple or Amazon, technology hasn’t proven to be a +significant barrier to new entrants in ride-sharing. Across the +globe, Uber has dozens of competitors, and in many markets they +have grabbed the lion’s share of the ride-sharing market.
+ +Even if Uber fixes all of its current problems, it’s increasingly +unlikely that it can live up to the inflated expectations that +come with the nearly $70 billion valuation that have made it the +world’s most valuable startup. There are barbarians at Uber’s +gate, and it’s sorely in need of a moat.
+
This is why they’re pursuing self-driving technology so aggressively. There’s simply no way that Uber is worth $70 billion without some sort of exclusive technical advantage. That’s the interesting flip side to Kalanick’s ouster — I’m not sure who would want the job.
+ +++ +Travis Kalanick’s final hours as Uber’s chief executive played out +in a private room in a downtown Chicago hotel on Tuesday.
+ +There, Mr. Kalanick, who was on a trip to interview executive +candidates for Uber, was paid a surprise visit. Two venture +capitalists — Matt Cohler and Peter Fenton of the Silicon Valley +firm Benchmark, which is one of Uber’s biggest shareholders — +presented Mr. Kalanick with a list of demands, including his +resignation before the end of the day. The letter was from five of +Uber’s major investors, including Benchmark and the mutual fund +giant Fidelity Investments. […]
+ +By the end of the day, after hours of haggling and arguing, that +course was clear: Mr. Kalanick agreed to step down as Uber’s chief +executive.
+
Truly great reporting from Isaac, including the fact that even during his brief “leave of absence”, he wasn’t really absent at all:
+ +++ +In reality, Mr. Kalanick had little intention of staying away from +his company. Almost immediately after announcing the leave of +absence, he worked the phones to push out Mr. Bonderman for making +the sexist comment onstage at an Uber employee meeting. With the +two increasingly at odds, Mr. Kalanick sent out a flurry of texts, +phone calls and emails to his allies to pressure Mr. Bonderman to +step down from Uber’s board. Hours later, Mr. Bonderman did.
+
++ +The last installment of the original “Choose Your Own Adventure” +series came out in 1998, but since 2004, Chooseco, founded by +one of the series’ original authors, R.A. Montgomery, has been +republishing classic volumes, as well as new riffs on the form of +interactive fiction that seemed ubiquitous in the 1980s and ’90s. +The new editions also carry an additional feature — maps of the +hidden structure of each book.
+
Just looking at the maps included in the article, it’s interesting how wildly varying in complexity these stories were. See also: Christian Swinehart’s color-coded graphical representations of these books.
+ +(Via Kottke.)
+ +++ +Museum Historian John Markoff moderates a discussion with former +iPhone team members Hugo Fiennes, Nitin Ganatra and Scott Herz, +followed by a conversation with Scott Forstall.
+
Fascinating stories.
+ +Forstall was great. It’s hard to believe he’s been out of Apple and out of the limelight for 5 years — watching him on stage with Markoff it feels like he never left.
+ +++ +Uber confirmed the resignation, and the company’s board issued a +statement that said, in part: “Travis has always put Uber first. +This is a bold decision and a sign of his devotion and love for +Uber.” (For those who don’t speak fluent tech director, there are +four things in those two sentences that are not true.)
+
++ +In the letter, titled “Moving Uber Forward” and obtained by The +New York Times, the investors wrote to Mr. Kalanick that he must +immediately leave and that the company needed a change in +leadership. Mr. Kalanick, 40, consulted with at least one Uber +board member, and after long discussions with some of the +investors, he agreed to step down. He will remain on Uber’s board +of directors.
+ +“I love Uber more than anything in the world and at this difficult +moment in my personal life I have accepted the investors request +to step aside so that Uber can go back to building rather than be +distracted with another fight,” Mr. Kalanick said in a statement.
+
From the outside, it seems like this was inevitable. It was only a question of when.
+ +++ +Turns out that Tesla isn’t a good fit for me after all. I’m interested to hear about interesting roles for a seasoned engineering leader!
+
That was quick — he was only hired 5 months ago.
+ +Functional and fun yet mnml af. 🤔 😆 🔥
+ +++ +A recording of an internal briefing at Apple earlier this month +obtained by The Outline sheds new light on how far the most +valuable company in the world will go to prevent leaks about new +products. […]
+ +The briefing, which offers a revealing window into the company’s +obsession with secrecy, was the first of many Apple is planning to +host for employees. In it, Rice and Freedman speak candidly about +Apple’s efforts to prevent leaks, discuss how previous leakers got +caught, and take questions from the approximately 100 attendees.
+
There’s some irony in a leaked recording of an internal briefing on stopping leaks.
+ +This is news to me:
+ +++ +However, Rice says, Apple has cracked down on leaks from its +factories so successfully that more breaches are now happening on +Apple’s campuses in California than its factories abroad. “Last +year was the first year that Apple [campuses] leaked more than the +supply chain,” Rice tells the room. “More stuff came out of Apple +[campuses] last year than all of our supply chain combined.” […]
+ +In the years since Tim Cook pledged to double down on secrecy, +Rice’s team has gotten better at safeguarding enclosures. “In 2014 +we had 387 enclosures stolen,” he says. “In 2015 we had 57 +enclosures stolen, 50 of which were stolen on the night of +announce, which was so painful.” In 2016, Rice says the company +produced 65 million housings, and only four were stolen. “So it’s +about a one in 16 million loss ratio, which is unheard of in the +industry.”
+
There’s a short (15 minute) podcast that accompanies the report, with Turton and The Outline’s Adrianne Jeffries. It’s worth a listen. (It doesn’t seem possible to link directly to a single episode of their podcast, so here’s a direct link for Overcast users.)
+ +Sponsored by:
+ +Here’s an annotated screenshot (and threaded rant) I posted to Twitter while trying to read Steven Sinofksy’s WWDC 2017 trip report on my iPad Pro review unit last week.
+ +Safari already has a built-in Sharing button. It has all the options for sharing I need. And as I scroll the page, it disappears so that I can see as much text on screen as possible. Safari is designed to be reader-friendly, as it should be. But it’s trivial to get that Sharing button back when I want it – just tap the bottom of the screen and there it is. Easy.
+ +This is now a very common design pattern for mobile web layouts. Medium is far from alone. It’s getting hard to find a news site that doesn’t put a persistent sharing dickbar down there.
+ +More examples:
+ +TechCrunch’s waste of space deserves special mention, for having a persistent navbar at the top and a persistent ad, in addition to their sharing dickbar.
+ +I’m sure “engagement” does register higher with these sharing dickbars, but I suspect a big part of that is because of accidental taps. And even so, what is more important, readability or “engagement”? Medium wants to be about readability but that’s hard to square with this dickbar, and especially hard to square with the “Open in App” button floating above it.
+ +iOS also has a standard way to prompt users to install the app version of a website — Smart App Banners. And it’s user-dismissible.
+ +For any piece over a page long, I read Medium pieces with Safari’s Reader Mode. Medium is supposed to be a reader-optimized layout by default. It should be one of the sites where you’re never even tempted to switch to Reader Mode.
+ +I’m frustrated by this design pattern everywhere I see it. But I’m especially disappointed by Medium’s adoption of it. I don’t expect better from most websites. I do expect better from Medium.
+ +A website should not fight the browser. Let the browser provide the chrome, and simply provide the content. Web developers know this is right — these dickbars are being rammed down their throats by SEO experts. The SEO folks are the same dopes who came up with the genius strategy of requiring 5-10 megabytes of privacy-intrusive CPU-intensive JavaScript on every page load that slows down websites. Now they come to their teams and say, “Our pages are too slow — we gotta move to AMP so our pages load fast.”
+ +I don’t expect to break through to the SEO shitheads running the asylums at most of these publications, but Medium is supposed to be good. When people click a URL and see that it’s a Medium site, their reaction should be “Oh, good, a Medium site — this will be nice to read.” Right now it’s gotten to the point where when people realize an article is on Medium, they think, “Oh, crap, it’s on Medium.”
+ + + + ]]>++ +Verdict: The Surface Laptop is not a laptop. It’s a glue-filled +monstrosity. There is nothing about it that is upgradable or +long-lasting, and it literally can’t be opened without destroying +it. (Show us the procedure, Microsoft, we’d love to be wrong.)
+
iFixit’s point of view on this is logical, and they’re certainly not alone in wishing for the good old days of user-accessible and user-upgradeable components. But it’s silly to argue that the Surface Laptop is “not a laptop” only because it’s a sealed box. It’s like saying the iPhone is not a phone because it doesn’t have a replaceable battery.
+ +Update: Apple’s AirPods got a 0/10 from iFixit. That just goes to show how little correlation there is between iFixit’s concept of repairability and whether a product is good or not. I consider AirPods to be Apple’s best new product in years.
+ +++ +Standard Ebooks is a volunteer driven, not-for-profit project +that produces lovingly formatted, open source, and free public +domain ebooks.
+ +Ebook projects like Project Gutenberg transcribe ebooks and +make them available for the widest number of reading devices. +Standard Ebooks takes ebooks from sources like Project +Gutenberg, formats and typesets them using a carefully designed +and professional-grade style guide, lightly modernizes them, +fully proofreads and corrects them, and then builds them to +take advantage of state-of-the-art ereader and browser +technology. […]
+ +Other free ebooks don’t put much effort into professional-quality +typography: they use "straight" quotes instead of “curly” quotes, +they ignore details like em- and en-dashes, and they look more +like early-90’s web pages instead of actual books.
+ +The Standard Ebooks project applies a rigorous and modern +typography manual when developing each and every ebook to ensure +they meet a professional-grade and consistent typographical +standard. Our ebooks look good.
+
What a fantastic project. Project Gutenberg is an amazing library, but their books are a mess typographically. (Via Daniel Bogan.)
+ +++ +According to Sensor Tower’s analysis of App Intelligence, +the total space required by the top 10 most installed U.S. iPhone +apps has grown from 164 MB in May 2013 to about 1.8 GB last month, +an 11× or approximately 1,000 percent increase in just four years. +In the following report, we delve deeper into which apps have +grown the most.
+
Apple really needs to do something about this. It’s not just that these apps are too big, but some of them issue software updates every week (or even more frequently). It’s a huge waste of bandwidth, time, and on-device storage space.
+ +++ +At long last, the perfect score for arcade classic Ms. Pac-Man has +been achieved, though not by a human. Maluuba — a deep learning +team acquired by Microsoft in January — has created an AI system +that’s learned how to reach the game’s maximum point value of +999,900 on Atari 2600, using a unique combination of reinforcement +learning with a divide-and-conquer method.
+
Unlike the notoriously bad 2600 port of Pac-Man, the Ms. Pac-Man port was both fun and true to the spirit of the coin-op.
+ +++ +As devices change, our visual language changes with them. It’s +time to move away from the navbar in favor of navigation within +thumb-reach. For the purposes of this article, we’ll call that +Reach Navigation.
+
This design trend is clearly already underway, and Ellis does a terrific job explaining why it’s a good idea.
+ +I can think of a few factors that led to the original iPhone having a top-of-the-screen UI for navigation. First, at just 3.5 inches diagonally, the whole screen was reachable. But another factor might be as simple as the fact that “navigation” was always at the top on desktops — window titles and controls have always been at the top on Mac and Windows. The iPhone didn’t use windows, per se, but there was a certain familiarity with having the titles and controls like Back/Close/Done buttons at the top. Something like the iOS 10 bottom-heavy design of Apple Maps is wholly different from a desktop UI design — as it should be.
+ +++ +As Mackey surely understood, this meant that AmazonFresh was at a +cost disadvantage to physical grocers as well: in order to be +competitive AmazonFresh needed to stock a lot of perishable items; +however, as long as AmazonFresh was not operating at meaningful +scale a huge number of those perishable items would spoil. And, +given the inherent local nature of groceries, scale needed to be +achieved not on a national basis but a city one.
+ +Groceries are a fundamentally different problem that need a +fundamentally different solution; what is so brilliant about this +deal, though, is that it solves the problem in a fundamentally +Amazonian way.
+
++ +At WWDC this year, Apple senior vice president of software +engineering Craig Federighi performed a demo of the company’s new +augmented reality platform, ARKit, while mentioning popular +furniture company IKEA as an upcoming partner in the technology. +Similarly, Apple CEO Tim Cook referenced an Ikea AR partnership in +a recent interview with Bloomberg Businessweek.
+ +Now, Ikea executive Michael Valdsgaard has spoken about the +company’s partnership with Apple and ARKit, describing an all-new +augmented reality app that will help customers make “reliable +buying decisions” for Ikea’s big ticket items.
+
Very cool idea — probably the sort of thing that’s going to be common soon. I’m curious how much of a leg up ARKit will give iOS on this front.
+ +Buying a domain from Squarespace is quick, simple, and fun. Search for the domain you want, or type any word or phrase into the search field and Squarespace will suggest some great options. Every domain comes with a beautiful, ad-free parking page, WHOIS Privacy, and a 2048-bit SSL certificate to secure your website — all at no additional cost. Once you lock down your domain, create a beautiful website with one of Squarespace’s award-winning templates. Try Squarespace for free. When you’re ready to subscribe, get 10% off at squarespace.com with offer code “DARING17”.
+ +++ +How did iPhone come to be? On June 20, four members of the +original development team will discuss the secret Apple project, +which in the past decade has remade the computer industry, changed +the business landscape, and become a tool in the hands of more +than a billion people around the world.
+ +Part 1: Original iPhone Engineers Nitin Ganatra, Scott Herz, and +Hugo Fiennes in Conversation with John Markoff
+ +Part 2: Original iPhone Software Team Leader Scott Forstall in +Conversation with John Markoff
+
It kills me that I can’t make this. Hopefully there will be video.
+ +Here’s the thing: Forstall was obviously a divisive figure inside Apple. He saw himself as an indispensable man after Steve Jobs died, and it turns out he wasn’t.
+ +But there can be no dispute that Forstall led one of the most successful software projects ever undertaken. It’s a cliche to say that they achieved the impossible, but what Forstall’s team achieved was considered by many — including many of the members of the team — impossible. But they did it, and in the ensuing years they kept making iOS better and better. It’s not just that they managed to ship the original iPhone OS in June 2007, but the entire run up through Forstall’s ouster from the company was simply amazing.
+ +Across the company, it’s clear that Forstall’s style was not popular. But I know many people who worked on his iOS team, and most of them loved working for him, or at the very least appreciated working for him. The thing I’ve heard over and over is that Forstall was incredibly demanding, yes, but if you were on his team and did good work he had your back.
+ +Forstall pretty much hasn’t said a damn thing about Apple since he left the company five years ago. So if he opens up at all to Markoff, this could be fascinating. His team’s story about actually implementing the original iPhone remains largely untold.
+ +++ +And, of course, we talk about the quotes from Tony Fadell and +Brett Bilbrey in the excerpt we just published, in which Fadell +tells a story about Phil Schiller arguing the iPhone should have a +hardware keyboard. Schiller has said the story isn’t true, and +Fadell has tried to walk it back as well.
+ +“So I wasn’t in the room at Apple 10, 15 years ago when this would +have happened,” says Merchant, who has the exchange on tape. “But +this is a quote verbatim as Tony Fadell who was in the room told +it to me. He told me this quote in such detail and he gave such a +vivid account, and I had no reason to believe it was untrue.”
+ +Merchant says the controversy has “blown him away.”
+
I figured Merchant had Fadell’s interview recorded. The quotes were too extensive not to have been recorded. It’s pretty clear what happened: Fadell told Merchant exactly what he’s quoted as saying, but now that he’s seen how it’s playing out, he wants to walk it back. It’s a little late for that.
+ +++ +A good way to think about the iPad’s new display with ProMotion +is not the difference between low-res and Retina screens, but +the jump from 30fps to 60fps. You see more of every animation. +Text is more legible when you scroll and doesn’t judder. It’s +hard to explain and it has to be seen and experienced to be +fully understood. Every scroll, page transition, and app launch +animation on the 10.5″ iPad Pro is absurdly smooth to the point +of feeling unrealistic at first — hence the common reaction +that something doesn’t quite compute. But as you spend some time +with the new iPad and start using it on a daily basis, its +display becomes normal and you wish that other Apple displays +were the same.
+ +I’m not even a week into my tests with the 10.5″ iPad Pro, and +I think scrolling on my first-gen 12.9″ iPad Pro looks choppy +now. I’d be surprised if 120Hz displays with ProMotion don’t +expand to the iPhone later this year and other Apple computers +in the future. The combination of hardware and software really +is that good.
+
Last year when True Tone was introduced with the 9.7-inch iPad Pro, Phil Schiller said something to the effect of “Once you get used to True Tone, you can’t go back.” I optimistically took that as a sign that the iPhone 7 would have True Tone. It did not, and the reason is probably that True Tone requires additional hardware sensors on the front face to pick up the ambient light temperature, and the iPhone has less room for additional sensors. But with ProMotion, I’m really hopeful that it’ll make its way into this year’s new iPhones. ProMotion doesn’t require additional sensors — only a super-fast GPU (which the iPhone will have) and intricate software support in iOS (which work Apple has already done for the iPad Pro).
+ +Anyway, it’s really hard to quote just one bit from Viticci’s review. If you only thoroughly read one review of the new iPad Pro, it should be his. Nobody outside Apple cares as much about iPad as he does.
+ +Matthew Panzarino, TechCrunch, “Apple Pays Off Its Future-of-Computing Promise With iPad Pro”:
+ +++ +After playing with the new iPad Pro 10.5” for a few days, I am +convinced that it’s fairly impossible to do a detailed review of +it in its current state.
+ +Not because there is some sort of flaw, but because it was clearly +designed top to bottom as an empty vessel in which to pour iOS 11.
+ +Every feature, every hardware advancement, every piece of +understated technical acrobatics is in the service of making +Apple’s next-generation software shine.
+
Dieter Bohn, The Verge, “iPad Pro 10.5 Review: Overkill”:
+ +++ +I was all set to complain that increasing the size from 9.7 to +10.5 was not a big enough jump to justify requiring people to buy +new keyboards and accessories. Then I started typing on the +on-screen keyboard and on the new hardware Smart Keyboard. Even +though I’m dubious about Apple’s claim that the software keyboard +is “full size”, I find the slight size increase makes touch typing +much easier. It’s still a little cramped, but it’s much easier to +bounce between this and a real keyboard now.
+
It really does make a difference in typing, and no practical difference at all in terms of holdability.
+ +Bohn again:
+ +++ +To me, if you’re going to spend $650 on a computer, it should +almost surely be your main computer. And if you’re going to make +the iPad Pro your main computer, you should probably get more than +64GB of storage and you should also probably get a keyboard to go +with it (to say nothing of the Apple Pencil). It hits the $1,000 +mark very quickly.
+
I don’t agree with the notion that a $650 computer should be your “main computer” at all. Apple stuff isn’t for the budget-conscious — news at 11.
+ +Brian X. Chen, The New York Times, “New iPad Pro Inches Toward Replacing PC, but Falls Short”:
+ +++ +Five years later, Mr. Jobs’s successor, Timothy D. Cook, took the +iPad a step further. Unveiling the iPad Pro, a souped-up tablet +that worked with Apple’s keyboard and stylus, he remarked that +people would try the product and “conclude they no longer need to +use anything else, other than their phones.”
+ +That prediction has not appeared to come true. Many professionals +say they use an iPad in addition to a personal computer, and sales +of iPads have shrunk quarter after quarter for more than a year, +an indication that hordes of people were not trading in their PCs +for tablets just yet.
+ +That situation is unlikely to change with Apple’s newest iPad Pro, +which will be released this week. […] But after about a week of +testing the 10.5-inch iPad Pro, I concluded that Apple’s +professional tablet still suffers from some of the same problems +when compared with a laptop.
+
That’s a slanted truncation of Cook’s quote. Cook’s full quote: “Yes, the iPad Pro is a replacement for a notebook or a desktop for many, many people. They will start using it and conclude they no longer need to use anything else, other than their phones.” Chen’s truncation makes it sound like Cook claimed the iPad Pro was a Mac or Windows replacement for everyone. He didn’t. And the fact that the new iPad Pro debuted alongside new MacBooks, MacBook Pros, and even more-megahertz-in-the-box MacBook Airs shows that Apple doesn’t think so either. Update: And I completely forgot to mention the solid updates to the iMacs and the announcement of the iMac Pro.
+ +“I prefer a laptop to an iPad Pro” is very different from “A laptop is better than an iPad Pro”. Me, personally, I much prefer working on a MacBook Pro to an iPad Pro. But I can see why others feel the opposite. That’s the whole point of Apple’s strategy of keeping them separate, rather than unifying them Microsoft Surface-style.
+ +iPad’s slowly diminishing sales are a real thing. But I don’t think that can be used as a gauge for whether more and more people are using an iPad as their main computer. And iPad sales are still more than double those of the Mac. There’s no reason to doubt that “many, many people” are concluding they no longer need a Mac or PC.
+ +Andrew Cunningham, Ars Technica, “The 10.5-Inch iPad Pro Is Much More “Pro” Than What It Replaces”:
+ +++ +Of all the computers Apple sells, none of them has screens that do +quite as much stuff as the iPad Pros are doing.
+ +That list starts with DCI-P3 color gamut support (new in the +12.9-inch Pro, returning to the smaller one) and an +anti-reflective coating, features also present in recent iMacs and +MacBook Pros. But the True Tone feature, which detects the color +temperature of the ambient light, adjusts the display’s color +temperature to match. Most significantly, the iPad’s refresh rate +has been bumped up to 120Hz, twice the normal 60Hz. The screens in +the iPad Pros are the best screens Apple ships, which is +appropriate for a thing that’s just a giant screen by design.
+ +The 10.5-inch Pro has a 2224×1668 screen, up just a little bit +from the 2048×1536 in 9.7-inch iPads. The density is identical, so +photos and text are exactly the same size they were before; you +can just fit a bit more of them on-screen at once.
+
That’s important to note. There was some clever speculation by Dan Provost a few months ago that the 10.5-inch iPad would have the same pixel dimensions as the 12.9-inch iPad Pro, with a higher pixels-per-inch density. That’s what Apple did with the iPad Mini. The problem with that speculation is that while the math worked out, the size of things on screen would not. Everything would be shrunk by 20 percent. Not everyone’s eyes can handle that. That’s fine for the Mini — which is often used by sharp-eyed children — but not fine for the standard size iPad.
+ +I had been thinking that maybe what Apple would do is what Provost suggested, but offer a choice between standard and zoomed mode like the Plus-sized iPhones do. Nope. I think what they’ve done is better though, because I think a scaled “zoomed” interface would look blurry at just 324 ppi. The iPhone Plus displays have a resolution of 401 ppi.
+ +Harry McCracken, Fast Company, “A Better Window Into The World Of Apps”:
+ +++ + + + ]]>You can suss out a lot about Apple’s priorities from the aspects +of a product it leaves alone and the ones it never stops +obsessing over.
+ +Consider the iPad. Every generation of Apple’s tablet since the +first one in 2010 has had the same stated battery life–“up to 10 +hours”–which suggests that the company thinks that shooting for +anything in excess of that would be wasted effort.
+ +That 2010 iPad weighed a pound and a half, and felt a bit hefty in +the hand. With 2013’s iPad Air, Apple whittled that down to about +a pound. And there the mid-sized iPads have stayed, +weight-reduction mission accomplished.
+ +However, when it comes to the iPad’s display, Apple has never been +satisfied to rest on its technological laurels.
+
But Fadell spoke to Merchant extensively, including this shot at Phil Schiller:
+ +++ +The iPod phone was losing support. The executives debated which +project to pursue, but Phil Schiller, Apple’s head of marketing, +had an answer: Neither. He wanted a keyboard with hard buttons. +The BlackBerry was arguably the first hit smartphone. It had an +email client and a tiny hard keyboard. After everyone else, +including Fadell, started to agree that multitouch was the way +forward, Schiller became the lone holdout.
+ +He “just sat there with his sword out every time, going, ‘No, +we’ve got to have a hard keyboard. No. Hard keyboard.’ And he +wouldn’t listen to reason as all of us were like, ‘No, this works +now, Phil.’ And he’d say, ‘You gotta have a hard keyboard!’” +Fadell says.
+
I don’t know if it’s true or not that Schiller was singlehandedly pushing for a Blackberry-style keyboard. But even if true, it only looks foolish in hindsight, especially if this argument took place before the iPhone’s software team had come up with a proof-of-concept software keyboard. Today it’s clear that the iPhone needed a good keyboard, and that a touchscreen keyboard can be a good keyboard. Neither of those things was obvious in 2005. And in the context of this story, it’s clear that at the time of this purported argument, Steve Jobs and Apple weren’t yet sure if the iPhone should be a pocket-sized personal computer or a consumer electronics product that would have no more need for a keyboard (hardware or software) than an iPod did. My guess is that Schiller was insisting that the iPhone needed to be a personal computer, not a mere gadget, and it wasn’t unreasonable to believe a software keyboard wouldn’t be good enough. For chrissakes there were critics who insisted that the iPhone’s software keyboard wasn’t good enough for years after the iPhone actually shipped.
+ +I do know that Schiller’s hard-charging, brusque style and his obvious political acumen have made him a lot of enemies over the years. It sounds like Fadell is one of them.
+ +So I’ll just say this: this story about Phil Schiller pushing for a hardware keyboard comes from one source (so far — if anyone out there can back that up, my window is always open for little birdies), and that one source is the guy who admittedly spent over a year working on iPhone prototypes with a click wheel interface.
+ +Then there’s this:
+ +++ +Schiller didn’t have the same technological acumen as many of the +other execs. “Phil is not a technology guy,” Brett Bilbrey, the +former head of Apple’s Advanced Technology Group, says. “There +were days when you had to explain things to him like a +grade-school kid.” Jobs liked him, Bilbrey thinks, because he +“looked at technology like middle America does, like Grandma and +Grandpa did.”
+
Hats off to Bilbrey for putting his name on this quote, but having spoken to Schiller both on- and off-the-record many times, the idea that he “looks at technology … like Grandma and Grandpa did” and needs things explained to him “like a grade-school kid” is bullshit. Especially off-the-record, Schiller can drill down on technical details to a surprising degree. I don’t know what Schiller did to piss off Bilbrey, but Bilbrey either has a huge chip on his shoulder or was severely misquoted by Merchant.1
+ +Anyway, I sure wish this book excerpt had come out before my live episode of The Talk Show last week — now I do have one more question I wish I’d gotten to ask Schiller.
+ +Here’s a story from Yoni Heisler for Network World on Brett Bilbrey’s retirement from Apple in 2014. Bilbrey headed Apple’s Technology Advancement Group. Merchant describes Bilbrey as having led “Apple’s Advanced Technology Group”. It’s a small detail, and the names are clearly similar, but the Advanced Technology Group was Larry Tesler’s R&D division at Apple, from 1986-1997. It was among the numerous divisions and products that Steve Jobs shitcanned after he rejoined the company. ↩︎
+Display: The new iPad Pros have the best displays of any computer I’ve ever seen. True Tone plus ProMotion is simply terrific. (The first generation 12.9-inch iPad Pro didn’t have True Tone; with these new models, the only noticeable difference between the 12.9- and 10.5-inch models is the size.) You really do have to see the 120 Hz refresh rate in person — and play with it while scrolling content on screen — to get it. You can actually read text as it’s moving during a scroll. It’s not as significant as the jump from non-retina to retina, but it’s in that ballpark.
Pencil: The latency of the Apple Pencil on a first-generation iPad Pro is the best I had ever seen for any stylus on any device at any price. The latency of the Apple Pencil on the new iPad Pro is so much better — so much closer to ink-on-paper imperceptibility — that you have to try it to believe it. It’s the one thing that really makes the first-gen iPad Pro feel “slow”.
Size: The increase in size is perfect. The footprint for a “regular” iPad has, until now, remained unchanged since the original iPad in 2010. That 9.7-inch display size was nearly perfect. This 10.5-inch display size is better though. Apple said during the keynote that typing on the on-screen keyboard is surprisingly better given just a bit more room, and I agree. And typing on the Smart Keyboard cover is way better than on last year’s 9.7-inch iPad Pro. In hand it doesn’t feel bigger at all. It feels like there were no trade-offs whatsoever in increasing the display size and overall device footprint. Part of that is because the weight has remained completely unchanged. I have had zero problems — not one — with the decreased bezel area. Apple’s inadvertent touch detection game is on point.
Battery: Battery life is great, as expected.
Performance: Apple’s in-house chip team continues to amaze. No one buys an iPad because of CPU benchmarks, but the new iPad Pro’s CPU performance is mind-boggling. Forget about comparisons to the one-port MacBook — the iPad Pro blows that machine out of the water performance-wise. The astounding thing is that the new iPad Pro holds its own against the MacBook Pro in single-core performance — around 3,900 on the Geekbench 4 benchmark for the iPad Pro vs. around 4,200–4,400 for the various configurations of 13- and 15-inch MacBook Pros.1 Multi-core performance has effectively doubled from the first generation of iPad Pro. That sort of year-over-year increase just doesn’t happen anymore, but here we are. The new iPad Pro gets a multi-core Geekbench 4 score of around 9200; the brand-new Core M3-based MacBook gets a multi-core score of around 6800. Again, this isn’t why people buy iPads — the iPad took off like a rocket in 2010 back when it was way slower (way way way slower) than even the slowest MacBook — but I think it is vastly underappreciated just how significantly Apple’s chip team is pulling ahead of the industry, especially Intel.2
All that said, the real story of these new iPad Pro models can’t be told today, because that story is iOS 11. I think iOS 11’s iPad-focused features are the entire reason why Apple waited until WWDC to unveil them. They could have held an event for them back in April, when they released the new starting-at-just-$329 9.7-inch iPad, but if they did, the only new software they could have demoed was Clips. I love Clips, but it’s just a fun little tool and doesn’t show off anything particular to iPad compared to iPhone.
+ +Again, the new iPad Pro hardware is almost too good to be true, but the iPad story Apple unveiled last week is iOS 11.
+ +It’s not fair to review a product running a developer beta of the OS — let alone the first (and generally buggiest) beta. So let’s stop the “review” right here: the new iPad Pros running iOS 10.3.2 are the best iPads ever made. You shouldn’t hesitate to buy one today, and if you do get one now, you should wait until iOS 11 ships in the fall to upgrade, or at the very least wait for a non-developer public beta of iOS 11 this summer before upgrading.
+ +But if you are reckless enough to install the iOS 11 beta on the new iPad Pro? Holy smokes is this better. I used the iPad Pro for a full week with iOS 10.3.2 because that’s the product that’s shipping, but after upgrading to iOS 11 beta 1 this morning and using it to write this entire review,3 I’m just blown away by how much more useful this machine is, and how much easier it is to work with 5 or 6 apps at a time.
+ +I would never recommend running a beta of any OS on any device that’s used for production purposes, so don’t take this as such, but for me personally, I can’t see going back to iOS 10.3.2 on any iPad that can handle it. It feels like a hand has been untied from behind my back, and this amazing hardware has finally been allowed to run free.
+ +You can browse Geekbench’s database of results for Mac and iOS. ↩︎
+Apple’s A10X chip is so high-performing that I think it’s put Apple in a slightly uncomfortable position marketing-wise. They can’t brag about it fully without making Intel (and by implication, their own MacBooks) look bad, and Intel remains an important partner for Apple. I don’t think it’s a coincidence that the most impressive iPad demo during the keynote (and the one that contained the most bragging about its performance compared to PCs) was done by a third-party developer — Ash Hewson of Serif, demonstrating Affinity Photo — not Greg Joswiak or anyone else from Apple. ↩︎︎
+Full disclosure: I went back to my Mac to write these 3 footnotes. That’s due more to the byzantine way I mark up footnotes than any limitation inherent to iOS vs. MacOS. But it feels worth noting. ↩︎︎
+++ +“Full Virus, Malware scanner”: What? I’m pretty sure it’s +impossible for any app to scan my iPhone for viruses or malware, +since third party apps are sandboxed to their own data, but let’s +keep reading…
+ +“You will pay $99.99 for a 7-day subscription”
+ +Uhh… come again?
+
There should be no “virus and malware” scanners in the App Store. None. iOS does not need anti-virus software. The App Store sandboxing rules mean that anti-virus software couldn’t really do anything useful anyway. And by allowing them to be listed on the store, it creates the false impression that Apple thinks you might need anti-virus software.
+ +But do-nothing anti-virus utilities that are scamming people into $100/week subscriptions? That’s downright criminal.
+ +Lin shows that “Mobile protection :Clean & Security VPN” is not alone. The productivity top-grossing list is riddled with similar scam apps.
+ +Given how many legitimate developers are still having problems getting their apps approved due to seemingly capricious App Store reviewer decisions, it’s doubly outrageous that these apps have made their way onto the store in the first place. These are the exact sort of apps that the App Store review process should be primarily looking to block.
+ +And there is no excuse for Apple not having flagged them after the fact, once they started generating significant revenue. It’s downright mind boggling that this horrendous “Mobile protection :Clean & Security VPN” app made it all the way into the top 10 without getting flagged.
+ +Based on Lin’s research, the pattern is simple:
+ +Apple needs to remove these apps from the App Store, and prevent such apps from getting into the store in the first place. They should reconsider the effects of allowing developers to buy their way to the top spot in search results. And they should police the top-grossing lists for apps that are pulling scams — the most important scams to catch are the successful ones.
+ +Lastly, every single dollar these apps have generated should be refunded to the victims of these scams.
+ + + + ]]>The California Theatre in San Jose has both an orchestra level and a balcony. That first bunch of tickets separated the two. After talking with the staff at the theater today, they recommended making all tickets general admission and allowing their ushers to fill the orchestra level first, and then direct remaining ticket holders to the balcony. So, all tickets, including those sold Wednesday, are now simply general admission. Everyone paid the same price, so I think this is fair, but I do apologize for any confusion. The theater is beautiful, and there are no bad seats.
+ +The next batch of tickets will go on sale today, Friday, at 1p ET/10a PT. Given what happened Wednesday, I expect them to sell out in a few minutes. I hate writing that because it sounds braggy, but I’m putting it out there just as fair warning. You’re going to have to act quick and maybe get lucky.
+ +If you want a ticket and wind up not getting one, there will be a live audio stream for everyone to listen to. This year we are not going to attempt to stream live video. Instead we’re going to work hard to get edited video of the event up on the web as soon as possible after the show is over. If you just can’t wait, listen to the live audio. If you want to see the show, wait for the video — it should be up some time on Wednesday at the latest.
+ +If you do get a ticket or already have one:
+ +New episode of America’s favorite 3-star podcast, with special guest John Moltz. Topics include more follow-up from WWDC 2017, the iPad Pro models and ProMotion, Scott Forstall’s interview with John Markoff regarding the 10-year anniversary of the original iPhone, the ongoing shitshow at Uber, quick thoughts on the Nintendo Switch, and more. Also: guess which John enjoys throwing babies into the air.
\n\nSponsored by:
\n\nJosh Centers, writing for TidBITS on Virgin Mobile’s intriguing decision to go iPhone-only:
\n\n\n\n\nPundits have long suspected that two roadblocks stood in the way\nof Apple becoming a carrier: the infrastructure is incredibly\nexpensive, even if you lease it from the larger carriers, and\nApple could limit the iPhone business if it were to compete with\nthe major carriers.
\n\nBut Apple has sidestepped those concerns by essentially taking\nover a carrier (actually a carrier-owned MVNO — Mobile Virtual\nNetwork Operator) without acquiring it. Apple may not own Virgin\nMobile, but Virgin Mobile is now utterly dependent on Apple and\nwill benefit through promotion in Apple Stores.
\n\nWe shouldn’t read too much into this deal, but at the very least\nit’s unusual to see a company like Virgin Mobile going all-in on\nthe iPhone. And it might point toward Apple dipping its toe into\nthe MVNO business.
\n
Virgin Mobile is owned by Sprint (and thus uses Sprint’s back-end), and in my experience Sprint is the worst of the U.S. carriers, so this is not a panacea. But it is intriguing.
\n\nTwo great examples via the very fun Made With ARKit Twitter account: here and here.
\n\nRene Ritchie has a comprehensive look at the just-released public beta of iOS 11. Romain Dillet has a good preview at TechCrunch too. The gist of both previews: it’s the “I hope Apple truly focuses on the iPad this year” release of iOS that we’ve been waiting for.
\n\nI’ve been using the developer betas on my 10.5-inch iPad Pro review unit and a spare iPhone. I’m willing to wait to install iOS 11 on my primary iPhone, but at this point, bugs be damned, I wouldn’t want to use an iPad running iOS 10.3. It’s stable enough, and the benefits of the great new features for iPad far outweigh the downsides of the beta (which, in addition to crashing bugs, include questionable battery life).
\n\nMat Honan, writing for BuzzFeed:
\n\n\n\n\nIt has this wild new feature called Drop In. Drop In lets you give\npeople permission to automatically connect with your device.\nHere’s how it works. Let’s say my father has activated Drop In for\nme on his Echo Show. All I have to do is say, “Alexa, drop in on\nDad.” It then turns on the microphone and camera on my father’s\ndevice and starts broadcasting that to me. For the several seconds\nof the call, my father’s video screen would appear fogged over.\nBut then there he’ll be. And to be clear: This happens even if he\ndoesn’t answer. Unless he declines the call, audibly or by tapping\non the screen, it goes through. It just starts. Hello, you look\nnice today.
\n\nHonestly, I haven’t figured out what to think about this yet. But,\nit’s here.
\n
I know what to think of this: No fucking way do I want this.
\n\nUpdate: I’ve already gotten a few reader responses arguing that this feature could be great for an Echo Show in the home of an elderly relative. You visit and set it up in their house, explain to them what it does, and then you can check in with them without their needing to do anything at all. I can see that. You can think of it as the digital equivalent of having a set of keys to someone’s house — something you’d only grant to a deeply trusted friend or loved one.
\n\nFrom a Tumblr help document euphemistically titled “Heads-Up for AT&T Customers”:
\n\n\n\n\nStarting on June 30, 2017, att.net customers will no longer be\nable to log in to their Yahoo and Tumblr accounts through email\naddresses with the following domains: att.net, ameritech.net,\nbellsouth.net, flash.net, nvbell.net, pacbell.net, prodigy.net,\nsbcglobal.net, snet.net, swbell.net, and wans.net.
\n
The sheer egregiousness of this is outrageous on its face, but it’s even worse when you consider that Tumblr, when it was independent, was a champion for net neutrality.
\n\nUpdate: TechCrunch says it’s just a deal expiring, not spite:
\n\n\n\n\nAs part of the new corporate merger of Yahoo and Aol under the\nOath brand, it looks like Yahoo accounts will no longer be\naccessible through AT&T email addresses (or those of any A&T\nsubsidiaries).
\n\nThe move provoked some uproar among net neutrality advocates, but\nit seems to be less about creating walled gardens and more about\ncleaning up prior commitments and pre-existing partnerships.\nWhile there is a level of inconvenience for AT&T customers, this\nis less about net neutrality and more about unwinding those\ncorporate deals.
\n
I still say fuck Verizon and their stance on net neutrality.
\n\nCopiously documented and perfectly presented. Looked striking in the print edition, too.
\n\nTime is your most precious resource. You need to know how you are spending it.
\nBut time tracking sucks. Big Time. (Pun intended.)
The brand new Timing fixes that. It automatically tracks which apps, documents and websites you use — without start/stop timers. See how you spend your time, eliminate distracting activities, and improve your client billing. Mind you, this data is super sensitive, so Timing keeps it safe on your Mac.
\n\nStop worrying about time and focus on doing your best work instead.
\n\nDownload a free 14-day trial today and get 10 percent off through next Monday.
\n\nMatt Birchler:
\n\n\n\n\n“App thinning” is not a magic bullet that erases this problem\nthough, as Facebook Messenger, which shows as being 154 MB, still\ndownloaded 99 MB of data for its update. […]
\n\nSo are giant app sizes a problem? Yes. Do delta updates allow\nthese updates to use less data? Yes. Do delta updates make these\nlarge apps a non-issue? Hell no!
\n
My thanks to Mnml for sponsoring this week’s DF RSS feed. It’s a native Mac app client for Medium, and can be used for writing, blogging, and notetaking. Based upon the same engine that twice won Desk “Best Apps of the Year” honors, Mnml has all the features you’ll need, wrapped in an attractive, fun – and yes, minimal – interface. Anyone who writes for Medium and prefers native client apps should check it out.
\n\nScott Galloway:
\n\n\n\n\nAmazon / Whole Foods will be the fourth-largest grocer in the US,\nand will likely post growth rates no $10B+ retailer, sans Amazon,\nhas registered. The Seattle firm will apply its operational chops\nand lower (zero) profit hurdle to the Whole Foods business model\nand bring prices (way) down. If you wish you could shop at Whole\nFoods more often, but it’s too expensive, your prayers have been\nanswered. Whole Foods will become the grocery equivalent of a\nMercedes for the price of a Toyota. Grocery has stuck their chin\nout (little innovation), and the entire sector is about to have\nits jaw shattered.
\n
It’s a great piece. I disagree with him on this though:
\n\n\n\n\nAmazon will displace Apple as the top tech hardware innovator,\nwith Alexa cementing itself as the gadget that defines the decade\n(post iPhone). Grocery / commerce via Alexa will create the\nutility that Alexa needs to [maintain its lead] over Google and\nApple’s home / voice offerings as they try to play catch-up.
\n
Alexa may well maintain its lead in the smart speaker market. It may even grow. Maybe HomePod will be a complete bust. But even if all of that happens, the smartphone will remain the dominant device in people’s lives. Something will eventually replace the phone, but smart speakers aren’t it.
\n\nHardware just isn’t where Amazon is good.
\n\nMark Bergen, reporting for Bloomberg:
\n\n\n\n\nGoogle is stopping one of the most controversial advertising\nformats: ads inside Gmail that scan users’ email contents. The\ndecision didn’t come from Google’s ad team, but from its cloud\nunit, which is angling to sign up more corporate customers.
\n\nAlphabet Inc.’s Google Cloud sells a package of office software,\ncalled G Suite, that competes with market leader Microsoft Corp.\nPaying Gmail users never received the email-scanning ads like the\nfree version of the program, but some business customers were\nconfused by the distinction and its privacy implications, said\nDiane Greene, Google’s senior vice president of cloud. “What we’re\ngoing to do is make it unambiguous,” she said.
\n
This is terrific news. Not just because it’s a good policy change in and of itself, but I take it as a sign that Google’s leadership is starting to realize how much damage they’ve done to the company’s reputation by playing fast and loose with their users’ privacy.
\n\nVia Jim Coudal, who summarizes this perfectly: “Poetry, in data”.
\n\nA succinct rundown of what’s wrong with the Senate Republicans’ “health care” bill.
\n\nKyle Orland, reporting for Ars Technica:
\n\n\n\n\nSince the days of the NES, people have accused Nintendo of\nintentionally underproducing hardware in order to drive an\nartificial feeding frenzy of demand in the marketplace. With the\nNintendo Switch remaining nearly impossible to find at retailers\nnationwide, those same accusations of “false scarcity” have been\nbubbling up in certain corners.
\n\nNintendo Senior Director of Corporate Communications Charlie\nScibetta wants to push back on those accusations. “It’s definitely\nnot intentional in terms of shorting the market,” he told Ars in a\nrecent interview. “We’re making it as fast as we can. We want to\nget as many units out as we can to support all the software that’s\ncoming out right now… our job really is to get it out as quick\nas we can, especially for this holiday because we want to have\nunits on shelves to support Super Mario Odyssey.”
\n
Ben Sandofsky:
\n\n\n\n\nPopular social networking apps are over 400 megs. With weekly\nreleases, over one year you’ll download twenty gigs of data.
\n\nSince we launched Halide, the most unexpected compliment we’ve\nheard is about its size. At 11 megs, we’ll push less data in one\nyear than a social network pushes in a single update.
\n\n“So you aren’t using Swift,” asked a friend. After all, Swift\nbundles its standard libraries into your app, bloating its size.\nHalide is almost entirely Swift. How did we do it? Let’s start\nwith the technical bits.
\n
His conclusion is spot-on:
\n\n\n\n\nThere really is one weird trick to lose size: focus on your customers.
\n
Jon Darke:
\n\n\n\n\nThis got me thinking — as a user who has a lot of apps\ninstalled, how much bandwidth does my phone use to keep my apps\nupdated? […]
\n\nOne Friday I turned off auto-update for apps and let the update\nqueue build up for a week. The results shocked me.
\n
It’s getting to the point where most apps can’t be updated over cellular because they’re all over 100 MB. This is madness.
\n\nUpdate: Many readers have written to argue that the listed sizes in the App Store aren’t what you actually download when updating an app, thanks to app thinning and other features. OK, but even with app thinning and delta updates these apps are still way too big as downloads and take up way too much storage on devices.
\n\nDan Primack, reporting for Axios:
\n\n\n\n\nMore than one thousand current Uber employees have signed a letter\nto the company’s board of directors, asking for the return of\ndeposed CEO Travis Kalanick “in an operational role.” One of its\nventure capital investors also is chiming in, with a similar\nmessage.
\n
Not surprising to me at all — Uber was made in Kalanick’s image.
\n\nKara Swisher:
\n\n\n\n\nIt was Lao Tzu who said that “the journey of a thousand miles\nbegins with a single step.”
\n\nIn the case of complete and utter change reeling through Uber\nright now — culminating in the resignation of its once\nuntouchable CEO Travis Kalanick — it turns out that it began with\none of the most epic blog posts to be written about what happens\nwhen a hot company becomes hostage to its increasingly\ndysfunctional and toxic behaviors.
\n\nIt was clear from the moment you read the 3,000-word post by\nformer engineer Susan Fowler about her time at the car-hailing\ncompany that nothing was going to be the same. Titled simply,\n“Reflecting on one very, very strange year at Uber,” the\nessay deftly and surgically laid out the map that the media and\nothers would use to prove to its out-to-lunch board and waffling\ninvestors that Uber CEO Travis Kalanick had to go.
\n
The truth and courage are a powerful combination.
\n\nGreat investigative work by Kashmir Hill and Surya Mattu for Gizmodo:
\n\n\n\n\nDuring a recent investigation into how a drug-trial recruitment\ncompany called Acurian Health tracks down people who look online\nfor information about their medical conditions, we discovered\nNaviStone’s code on sites run by Acurian, Quicken Loans, a\ncontinuing education center, a clothing store for plus-sized\nwomen, and a host of other retailers. Using Javascript, those\nsites were transmitting information from people as soon as they\ntyped or auto-filled it into an online form. That way, the company\nwould have it even if those people immediately changed their minds\nand closed the page. […]
\n\nWe decided to test how the code works by pretending to shop on\nsites that use it and then browsing away without finalizing the\npurchase. Three sites — hardware site Rockler.com, gift site\nCollectionsEtc.com, and clothing site BostonProper.com — sent us\nemails about items we’d left in our shopping carts using the email\naddresses we’d typed onto the site but had not formally submitted.\nAlthough Gizmodo was able to see the email address information\nbeing sent to Navistone, the company said that it was not\nresponsible for those emails.
\n
They weren’t responsible for sending the emails, but they were responsible for the email addresses being sent to those websites in the first place. Sending form data surreptitiously is morally wrong, and everyone knows it.
\n\nThis might sound hyperbolic, but I mean it: I think we’d be better off if JavaScript had never been added to web browsers.
\n\nChristopher Mims, in his column for The Wall Street Journal:
\n\n\n\n\nBut even when it steers through that thicket of crises, Uber will\nhave to come to grips with a fundamental vulnerability that is\nincreasingly apparent in the company’s business model. Uber may be\ngreat at technology, but unlike the businesses of Google,\nFacebook, Apple or Amazon, technology hasn’t proven to be a\nsignificant barrier to new entrants in ride-sharing. Across the\nglobe, Uber has dozens of competitors, and in many markets they\nhave grabbed the lion’s share of the ride-sharing market.
\n\nEven if Uber fixes all of its current problems, it’s increasingly\nunlikely that it can live up to the inflated expectations that\ncome with the nearly $70 billion valuation that have made it the\nworld’s most valuable startup. There are barbarians at Uber’s\ngate, and it’s sorely in need of a moat.
\n
This is why they’re pursuing self-driving technology so aggressively. There’s simply no way that Uber is worth $70 billion without some sort of exclusive technical advantage. That’s the interesting flip side to Kalanick’s ouster — I’m not sure who would want the job.
\n\nChris Lattner has updated his resume with his accomplishments at Tesla. Unsurprisingly, it sounds like he got a lot done in just five months — including, ironically, addressing an engineering talent retention problem.
\n\nMike Isaac, reporting for The New York Times:
\n\n\n\n\nTravis Kalanick’s final hours as Uber’s chief executive played out\nin a private room in a downtown Chicago hotel on Tuesday.
\n\nThere, Mr. Kalanick, who was on a trip to interview executive\ncandidates for Uber, was paid a surprise visit. Two venture\ncapitalists — Matt Cohler and Peter Fenton of the Silicon Valley\nfirm Benchmark, which is one of Uber’s biggest shareholders —\npresented Mr. Kalanick with a list of demands, including his\nresignation before the end of the day. The letter was from five of\nUber’s major investors, including Benchmark and the mutual fund\ngiant Fidelity Investments. […]
\n\nBy the end of the day, after hours of haggling and arguing, that\ncourse was clear: Mr. Kalanick agreed to step down as Uber’s chief\nexecutive.
\n
Truly great reporting from Isaac, including the fact that even during his brief “leave of absence”, he wasn’t really absent at all:
\n\n\n\n\nIn reality, Mr. Kalanick had little intention of staying away from\nhis company. Almost immediately after announcing the leave of\nabsence, he worked the phones to push out Mr. Bonderman for making\nthe sexist comment onstage at an Uber employee meeting. With the\ntwo increasingly at odds, Mr. Kalanick sent out a flurry of texts,\nphone calls and emails to his allies to pressure Mr. Bonderman to\nstep down from Uber’s board. Hours later, Mr. Bonderman did.
\n
Sarah Laskow, writing for Atlas Obscura:
\n\n\n\n\nThe last installment of the original “Choose Your Own Adventure”\nseries came out in 1998, but since 2004, Chooseco, founded by\none of the series’ original authors, R.A. Montgomery, has been\nrepublishing classic volumes, as well as new riffs on the form of\ninteractive fiction that seemed ubiquitous in the 1980s and ’90s.\nThe new editions also carry an additional feature — maps of the\nhidden structure of each book.
\n
Just looking at the maps included in the article, it’s interesting how wildly varying in complexity these stories were. See also: Christian Swinehart’s color-coded graphical representations of these books.
\n\n(Via Kottke.)
\n\nThe Computer History Museum (now on YouTube):
\n\n\n\n\nMuseum Historian John Markoff moderates a discussion with former\niPhone team members Hugo Fiennes, Nitin Ganatra and Scott Herz,\nfollowed by a conversation with Scott Forstall.
\n
Fascinating stories.
\n\nForstall was great. It’s hard to believe he’s been out of Apple and out of the limelight for 5 years — watching him on stage with Markoff it feels like he never left.
\n\nKara Swisher on Travis Kalanick:
\n\n\n\n\nUber confirmed the resignation, and the company’s board issued a\nstatement that said, in part: “Travis has always put Uber first.\nThis is a bold decision and a sign of his devotion and love for\nUber.” (For those who don’t speak fluent tech director, there are\nfour things in those two sentences that are not true.)
\n
Mike Isaac, reporting for The New York Times:
\n\n\n\n\nIn the letter, titled “Moving Uber Forward” and obtained by The\nNew York Times, the investors wrote to Mr. Kalanick that he must\nimmediately leave and that the company needed a change in\nleadership. Mr. Kalanick, 40, consulted with at least one Uber\nboard member, and after long discussions with some of the\ninvestors, he agreed to step down. He will remain on Uber’s board\nof directors.
\n\n“I love Uber more than anything in the world and at this difficult\nmoment in my personal life I have accepted the investors request\nto step aside so that Uber can go back to building rather than be\ndistracted with another fight,” Mr. Kalanick said in a statement.
\n
From the outside, it seems like this was inevitable. It was only a question of when.
\n\nChris Lattner:
\n\n\n\n\nTurns out that Tesla isn’t a good fit for me after all. I’m interested to hear about interesting roles for a seasoned engineering leader!
\n
That was quick — he was only hired 5 months ago.
\n\nCreated for discerning Medium.com writers and publishers, it’s the first dedicated desktop publishing client on the Mac App Store. Featured Worldwide on release, it’s the last writing, blogging, and note-taking app you’ll need.
\n\nFunctional and fun yet mnml af. 🤔 😆 🔥
\n\nWilliam Turton has quite a scoop for The Outline:
\n\n\n\n\nA recording of an internal briefing at Apple earlier this month\nobtained by The Outline sheds new light on how far the most\nvaluable company in the world will go to prevent leaks about new\nproducts. […]
\n\nThe briefing, which offers a revealing window into the company’s\nobsession with secrecy, was the first of many Apple is planning to\nhost for employees. In it, Rice and Freedman speak candidly about\nApple’s efforts to prevent leaks, discuss how previous leakers got\ncaught, and take questions from the approximately 100 attendees.
\n
There’s some irony in a leaked recording of an internal briefing on stopping leaks.
\n\nThis is news to me:
\n\n\n\n\nHowever, Rice says, Apple has cracked down on leaks from its\nfactories so successfully that more breaches are now happening on\nApple’s campuses in California than its factories abroad. “Last\nyear was the first year that Apple [campuses] leaked more than the\nsupply chain,” Rice tells the room. “More stuff came out of Apple\n[campuses] last year than all of our supply chain combined.” […]
\n\nIn the years since Tim Cook pledged to double down on secrecy,\nRice’s team has gotten better at safeguarding enclosures. “In 2014\nwe had 387 enclosures stolen,” he says. “In 2015 we had 57\nenclosures stolen, 50 of which were stolen on the night of\nannounce, which was so painful.” In 2016, Rice says the company\nproduced 65 million housings, and only four were stolen. “So it’s\nabout a one in 16 million loss ratio, which is unheard of in the\nindustry.”
\n
There’s a short (15 minute) podcast that accompanies the report, with Turton and The Outline’s Adrianne Jeffries. It’s worth a listen. (It doesn’t seem possible to link directly to a single episode of their podcast, so here’s a direct link for Overcast users.)
\n\nNew episode of my podcast, The Talk Show, with special guest Serenity Caldwell. We look back at WWDC 2017 — iOS 11, the new iPad Pro models, MacOS 10.13 “High Sierra”, updated Mac hardware and a tease at the upcoming iMac Pro, where Apple might go with VR and AR, San Jose as the venue for the event itself, and more.
\n\nSponsored by:
\n\nMedium seems to continue to grow in popularity as a publishing platform, and as it does, I’m growing more and more frustrated by their on-screen “engagement” turds. Every Medium site displays an on-screen “sharing” bar that covers the actual content I want to read. This is particularly annoying on the phone, where screen real estate is most precious. Now on iOS they’ve added an “Open in App” button that literally makes the last 1-2 lines of content on screen unreadable. To me these things are as distracting as having someone wave their hand in front of my face while I try to read.
\n\nHere’s an annotated screenshot (and threaded rant) I posted to Twitter while trying to read Steven Sinofksy’s WWDC 2017 trip report on my iPad Pro review unit last week.
\n\nSafari already has a built-in Sharing button. It has all the options for sharing I need. And as I scroll the page, it disappears so that I can see as much text on screen as possible. Safari is designed to be reader-friendly, as it should be. But it’s trivial to get that Sharing button back when I want it – just tap the bottom of the screen and there it is. Easy.
\n\nThis is now a very common design pattern for mobile web layouts. Medium is far from alone. It’s getting hard to find a news site that doesn’t put a persistent sharing dickbar down there.
\n\nMore examples:
\n\nTechCrunch’s waste of space deserves special mention, for having a persistent navbar at the top and a persistent ad, in addition to their sharing dickbar.
\n\nI’m sure “engagement” does register higher with these sharing dickbars, but I suspect a big part of that is because of accidental taps. And even so, what is more important, readability or “engagement”? Medium wants to be about readability but that’s hard to square with this dickbar, and especially hard to square with the “Open in App” button floating above it.
\n\niOS also has a standard way to prompt users to install the app version of a website — Smart App Banners. And it’s user-dismissible.
\n\nFor any piece over a page long, I read Medium pieces with Safari’s Reader Mode. Medium is supposed to be a reader-optimized layout by default. It should be one of the sites where you’re never even tempted to switch to Reader Mode.
\n\nI’m frustrated by this design pattern everywhere I see it. But I’m especially disappointed by Medium’s adoption of it. I don’t expect better from most websites. I do expect better from Medium.
\n\nA website should not fight the browser. Let the browser provide the chrome, and simply provide the content. Web developers know this is right — these dickbars are being rammed down their throats by SEO experts. The SEO folks are the same dopes who came up with the genius strategy of requiring 5-10 megabytes of privacy-intrusive CPU-intensive JavaScript on every page load that slows down websites. Now they come to their teams and say, “Our pages are too slow — we gotta move to AMP so our pages load fast.”
\n\nI don’t expect to break through to the SEO shitheads running the asylums at most of these publications, but Medium is supposed to be good. When people click a URL and see that it’s a Medium site, their reaction should be “Oh, good, a Medium site — this will be nice to read.” Right now it’s gotten to the point where when people realize an article is on Medium, they think, “Oh, crap, it’s on Medium.”
\n\n\n\n " + }, + { + "title" : "Microsoft Surface Laptop Teardown", + "date_published" : "2017-06-19T19:43:57Z", + "date_modified" : "2017-06-19T20:07:54Z", + "id" : "https://daringfireball.net/linked/2017/06/19/surface-laptop-ifixit", + "url" : "https://daringfireball.net/linked/2017/06/19/surface-laptop-ifixit", + "external_url" : "https://www.ifixit.com/Teardown/Microsoft+Surface+Laptop+Teardown/92915", + "author" : { + "name" : "John Gruber" + }, + "content_html" : "\niFixit gave the Surface Laptop a 0 out of 10 on their “Repairability Score”. The lowest anything from Apple has ever gotten is a 1, I believe.
\n\n\n\n\nVerdict: The Surface Laptop is not a laptop. It’s a glue-filled\nmonstrosity. There is nothing about it that is upgradable or\nlong-lasting, and it literally can’t be opened without destroying\nit. (Show us the procedure, Microsoft, we’d love to be wrong.)
\n
iFixit’s point of view on this is logical, and they’re certainly not alone in wishing for the good old days of user-accessible and user-upgradeable components. But it’s silly to argue that the Surface Laptop is “not a laptop” only because it’s a sealed box. It’s like saying the iPhone is not a phone because it doesn’t have a replaceable battery.
\n\nUpdate: Apple’s AirPods got a 0/10 from iFixit. That just goes to show how little correlation there is between iFixit’s concept of repairability and whether a product is good or not. I consider AirPods to be Apple’s best new product in years.
\n\nStandard Ebooks:
\n\n\n\n\nStandard Ebooks is a volunteer driven, not-for-profit project\nthat produces lovingly formatted, open source, and free public\ndomain ebooks.
\n\nEbook projects like Project Gutenberg transcribe ebooks and\nmake them available for the widest number of reading devices.\nStandard Ebooks takes ebooks from sources like Project\nGutenberg, formats and typesets them using a carefully designed\nand professional-grade style guide, lightly modernizes them,\nfully proofreads and corrects them, and then builds them to\ntake advantage of state-of-the-art ereader and browser\ntechnology. […]
\n\nOther free ebooks don’t put much effort into professional-quality\ntypography: they use "straight" quotes instead of “curly” quotes,\nthey ignore details like em- and en-dashes, and they look more\nlike early-90’s web pages instead of actual books.
\n\nThe Standard Ebooks project applies a rigorous and modern\ntypography manual when developing each and every ebook to ensure\nthey meet a professional-grade and consistent typographical\nstandard. Our ebooks look good.
\n
What a fantastic project. Project Gutenberg is an amazing library, but their books are a mess typographically. (Via Daniel Bogan.)
\n\nRandy Nelson, writing for the Sensor Tower blog:
\n\n\n\n\nAccording to Sensor Tower’s analysis of App Intelligence,\nthe total space required by the top 10 most installed U.S. iPhone\napps has grown from 164 MB in May 2013 to about 1.8 GB last month,\nan 11× or approximately 1,000 percent increase in just four years.\nIn the following report, we delve deeper into which apps have\ngrown the most.
\n
Apple really needs to do something about this. It’s not just that these apps are too big, but some of them issue software updates every week (or even more frequently). It’s a huge waste of bandwidth, time, and on-device storage space.
\n\nDani Deahl writing for The Verge:
\n\n\n\n\nAt long last, the perfect score for arcade classic Ms. Pac-Man has\nbeen achieved, though not by a human. Maluuba — a deep learning\nteam acquired by Microsoft in January — has created an AI system\nthat’s learned how to reach the game’s maximum point value of\n999,900 on Atari 2600, using a unique combination of reinforcement\nlearning with a divide-and-conquer method.
\n
Unlike the notoriously bad 2600 port of Pac-Man, the Ms. Pac-Man port was both fun and true to the spirit of the coin-op.
\n\nBrad Ellis:
\n\n\n\n\nAs devices change, our visual language changes with them. It’s\ntime to move away from the navbar in favor of navigation within\nthumb-reach. For the purposes of this article, we’ll call that\nReach Navigation.
\n
This design trend is clearly already underway, and Ellis does a terrific job explaining why it’s a good idea.
\n\nI can think of a few factors that led to the original iPhone having a top-of-the-screen UI for navigation. First, at just 3.5 inches diagonally, the whole screen was reachable. But another factor might be as simple as the fact that “navigation” was always at the top on desktops — window titles and controls have always been at the top on Mac and Windows. The iPhone didn’t use windows, per se, but there was a certain familiarity with having the titles and controls like Back/Close/Done buttons at the top. Something like the iOS 10 bottom-heavy design of Apple Maps is wholly different from a desktop UI design — as it should be.
\n\nGreat piece by Ben Thompson on Amazon’s intended acquisition of Whole Foods:
\n\n\n\n\nAs Mackey surely understood, this meant that AmazonFresh was at a\ncost disadvantage to physical grocers as well: in order to be\ncompetitive AmazonFresh needed to stock a lot of perishable items;\nhowever, as long as AmazonFresh was not operating at meaningful\nscale a huge number of those perishable items would spoil. And,\ngiven the inherent local nature of groceries, scale needed to be\nachieved not on a national basis but a city one.
\n\nGroceries are a fundamentally different problem that need a\nfundamentally different solution; what is so brilliant about this\ndeal, though, is that it solves the problem in a fundamentally\nAmazonian way.
\n
Mitchel Broussard:
\n\n\n\n\nAt WWDC this year, Apple senior vice president of software\nengineering Craig Federighi performed a demo of the company’s new\naugmented reality platform, ARKit, while mentioning popular\nfurniture company IKEA as an upcoming partner in the technology.\nSimilarly, Apple CEO Tim Cook referenced an Ikea AR partnership in\na recent interview with Bloomberg Businessweek.
\n\nNow, Ikea executive Michael Valdsgaard has spoken about the\ncompany’s partnership with Apple and ARKit, describing an all-new\naugmented reality app that will help customers make “reliable\nbuying decisions” for Ikea’s big ticket items.
\n
Very cool idea — probably the sort of thing that’s going to be common soon. I’m curious how much of a leg up ARKit will give iOS on this front.
\n\nMy thanks to Squarespace for sponsoring last week’s DF RSS feed. Squarespace handles everything related to creating, hosting, and maintaining a website, including domain name registration.
\n\nBuying a domain from Squarespace is quick, simple, and fun. Search for the domain you want, or type any word or phrase into the search field and Squarespace will suggest some great options. Every domain comes with a beautiful, ad-free parking page, WHOIS Privacy, and a 2048-bit SSL certificate to secure your website — all at no additional cost. Once you lock down your domain, create a beautiful website with one of Squarespace’s award-winning templates. Try Squarespace for free. When you’re ready to subscribe, get 10% off at squarespace.com with offer code “DARING17”.
\n\nThis is a fun challenge.
\n\nBlockbuster event next week at the Computer History Museum in Mountain View:
\n\n\n\n\nHow did iPhone come to be? On June 20, four members of the\noriginal development team will discuss the secret Apple project,\nwhich in the past decade has remade the computer industry, changed\nthe business landscape, and become a tool in the hands of more\nthan a billion people around the world.
\n\nPart 1: Original iPhone Engineers Nitin Ganatra, Scott Herz, and\nHugo Fiennes in Conversation with John Markoff
\n\nPart 2: Original iPhone Software Team Leader Scott Forstall in\nConversation with John Markoff
\n
It kills me that I can’t make this. Hopefully there will be video.
\n\nHere’s the thing: Forstall was obviously a divisive figure inside Apple. He saw himself as an indispensable man after Steve Jobs died, and it turns out he wasn’t.
\n\nBut there can be no dispute that Forstall led one of the most successful software projects ever undertaken. It’s a cliche to say that they achieved the impossible, but what Forstall’s team achieved was considered by many — including many of the members of the team — impossible. But they did it, and in the ensuing years they kept making iOS better and better. It’s not just that they managed to ship the original iPhone OS in June 2007, but the entire run up through Forstall’s ouster from the company was simply amazing.
\n\nAcross the company, it’s clear that Forstall’s style was not popular. But I know many people who worked on his iOS team, and most of them loved working for him, or at the very least appreciated working for him. The thing I’ve heard over and over is that Forstall was incredibly demanding, yes, but if you were on his team and did good work he had your back.
\n\nForstall pretty much hasn’t said a damn thing about Apple since he left the company five years ago. So if he opens up at all to Markoff, this could be fascinating. His team’s story about actually implementing the original iPhone remains largely untold.
\n\nNilay Patel, announcing a special episode of The Vergecast with The One Device author Brian Merchant:
\n\n\n\n\nAnd, of course, we talk about the quotes from Tony Fadell and\nBrett Bilbrey in the excerpt we just published, in which Fadell\ntells a story about Phil Schiller arguing the iPhone should have a\nhardware keyboard. Schiller has said the story isn’t true, and\nFadell has tried to walk it back as well.
\n\n“So I wasn’t in the room at Apple 10, 15 years ago when this would\nhave happened,” says Merchant, who has the exchange on tape. “But\nthis is a quote verbatim as Tony Fadell who was in the room told\nit to me. He told me this quote in such detail and he gave such a\nvivid account, and I had no reason to believe it was untrue.”
\n\nMerchant says the controversy has “blown him away.”
\n
I figured Merchant had Fadell’s interview recorded. The quotes were too extensive not to have been recorded. It’s pretty clear what happened: Fadell told Merchant exactly what he’s quoted as saying, but now that he’s seen how it’s playing out, he wants to walk it back. It’s a little late for that.
\n\nFederico Viticci, MacStories, “The 10.5-inch iPad Pro: Future-Proof”:
\n\n\n\n\nA good way to think about the iPad’s new display with ProMotion\nis not the difference between low-res and Retina screens, but\nthe jump from 30fps to 60fps. You see more of every animation.\nText is more legible when you scroll and doesn’t judder. It’s\nhard to explain and it has to be seen and experienced to be\nfully understood. Every scroll, page transition, and app launch\nanimation on the 10.5″ iPad Pro is absurdly smooth to the point\nof feeling unrealistic at first — hence the common reaction\nthat something doesn’t quite compute. But as you spend some time\nwith the new iPad and start using it on a daily basis, its\ndisplay becomes normal and you wish that other Apple displays\nwere the same.
\n\nI’m not even a week into my tests with the 10.5″ iPad Pro, and\nI think scrolling on my first-gen 12.9″ iPad Pro looks choppy\nnow. I’d be surprised if 120Hz displays with ProMotion don’t\nexpand to the iPhone later this year and other Apple computers\nin the future. The combination of hardware and software really\nis that good.
\n
Last year when True Tone was introduced with the 9.7-inch iPad Pro, Phil Schiller said something to the effect of “Once you get used to True Tone, you can’t go back.” I optimistically took that as a sign that the iPhone 7 would have True Tone. It did not, and the reason is probably that True Tone requires additional hardware sensors on the front face to pick up the ambient light temperature, and the iPhone has less room for additional sensors. But with ProMotion, I’m really hopeful that it’ll make its way into this year’s new iPhones. ProMotion doesn’t require additional sensors — only a super-fast GPU (which the iPhone will have) and intricate software support in iOS (which work Apple has already done for the iPad Pro).
\n\nAnyway, it’s really hard to quote just one bit from Viticci’s review. If you only thoroughly read one review of the new iPad Pro, it should be his. Nobody outside Apple cares as much about iPad as he does.
\n\nMatthew Panzarino, TechCrunch, “Apple Pays Off Its Future-of-Computing Promise With iPad Pro”:
\n\n\n\n\nAfter playing with the new iPad Pro 10.5” for a few days, I am\nconvinced that it’s fairly impossible to do a detailed review of\nit in its current state.
\n\nNot because there is some sort of flaw, but because it was clearly\ndesigned top to bottom as an empty vessel in which to pour iOS 11.
\n\nEvery feature, every hardware advancement, every piece of\nunderstated technical acrobatics is in the service of making\nApple’s next-generation software shine.
\n
Dieter Bohn, The Verge, “iPad Pro 10.5 Review: Overkill”:
\n\n\n\n\nI was all set to complain that increasing the size from 9.7 to\n10.5 was not a big enough jump to justify requiring people to buy\nnew keyboards and accessories. Then I started typing on the\non-screen keyboard and on the new hardware Smart Keyboard. Even\nthough I’m dubious about Apple’s claim that the software keyboard\nis “full size”, I find the slight size increase makes touch typing\nmuch easier. It’s still a little cramped, but it’s much easier to\nbounce between this and a real keyboard now.
\n
It really does make a difference in typing, and no practical difference at all in terms of holdability.
\n\nBohn again:
\n\n\n\n\nTo me, if you’re going to spend $650 on a computer, it should\nalmost surely be your main computer. And if you’re going to make\nthe iPad Pro your main computer, you should probably get more than\n64GB of storage and you should also probably get a keyboard to go\nwith it (to say nothing of the Apple Pencil). It hits the $1,000\nmark very quickly.
\n
I don’t agree with the notion that a $650 computer should be your “main computer” at all. Apple stuff isn’t for the budget-conscious — news at 11.
\n\nBrian X. Chen, The New York Times, “New iPad Pro Inches Toward Replacing PC, but Falls Short”:
\n\n\n\n\nFive years later, Mr. Jobs’s successor, Timothy D. Cook, took the\niPad a step further. Unveiling the iPad Pro, a souped-up tablet\nthat worked with Apple’s keyboard and stylus, he remarked that\npeople would try the product and “conclude they no longer need to\nuse anything else, other than their phones.”
\n\nThat prediction has not appeared to come true. Many professionals\nsay they use an iPad in addition to a personal computer, and sales\nof iPads have shrunk quarter after quarter for more than a year,\nan indication that hordes of people were not trading in their PCs\nfor tablets just yet.
\n\nThat situation is unlikely to change with Apple’s newest iPad Pro,\nwhich will be released this week. […] But after about a week of\ntesting the 10.5-inch iPad Pro, I concluded that Apple’s\nprofessional tablet still suffers from some of the same problems\nwhen compared with a laptop.
\n
That’s a slanted truncation of Cook’s quote. Cook’s full quote: “Yes, the iPad Pro is a replacement for a notebook or a desktop for many, many people. They will start using it and conclude they no longer need to use anything else, other than their phones.” Chen’s truncation makes it sound like Cook claimed the iPad Pro was a Mac or Windows replacement for everyone. He didn’t. And the fact that the new iPad Pro debuted alongside new MacBooks, MacBook Pros, and even more-megahertz-in-the-box MacBook Airs shows that Apple doesn’t think so either. Update: And I completely forgot to mention the solid updates to the iMacs and the announcement of the iMac Pro.
\n\n“I prefer a laptop to an iPad Pro” is very different from “A laptop is better than an iPad Pro”. Me, personally, I much prefer working on a MacBook Pro to an iPad Pro. But I can see why others feel the opposite. That’s the whole point of Apple’s strategy of keeping them separate, rather than unifying them Microsoft Surface-style.
\n\niPad’s slowly diminishing sales are a real thing. But I don’t think that can be used as a gauge for whether more and more people are using an iPad as their main computer. And iPad sales are still more than double those of the Mac. There’s no reason to doubt that “many, many people” are concluding they no longer need a Mac or PC.
\n\nAndrew Cunningham, Ars Technica, “The 10.5-Inch iPad Pro Is Much More “Pro” Than What It Replaces”:
\n\n\n\n\nOf all the computers Apple sells, none of them has screens that do\nquite as much stuff as the iPad Pros are doing.
\n\nThat list starts with DCI-P3 color gamut support (new in the\n12.9-inch Pro, returning to the smaller one) and an\nanti-reflective coating, features also present in recent iMacs and\nMacBook Pros. But the True Tone feature, which detects the color\ntemperature of the ambient light, adjusts the display’s color\ntemperature to match. Most significantly, the iPad’s refresh rate\nhas been bumped up to 120Hz, twice the normal 60Hz. The screens in\nthe iPad Pros are the best screens Apple ships, which is\nappropriate for a thing that’s just a giant screen by design.
\n\nThe 10.5-inch Pro has a 2224×1668 screen, up just a little bit\nfrom the 2048×1536 in 9.7-inch iPads. The density is identical, so\nphotos and text are exactly the same size they were before; you\ncan just fit a bit more of them on-screen at once.
\n
That’s important to note. There was some clever speculation by Dan Provost a few months ago that the 10.5-inch iPad would have the same pixel dimensions as the 12.9-inch iPad Pro, with a higher pixels-per-inch density. That’s what Apple did with the iPad Mini. The problem with that speculation is that while the math worked out, the size of things on screen would not. Everything would be shrunk by 20 percent. Not everyone’s eyes can handle that. That’s fine for the Mini — which is often used by sharp-eyed children — but not fine for the standard size iPad.
\n\nI had been thinking that maybe what Apple would do is what Provost suggested, but offer a choice between standard and zoomed mode like the Plus-sized iPhones do. Nope. I think what they’ve done is better though, because I think a scaled “zoomed” interface would look blurry at just 324 ppi. The iPhone Plus displays have a resolution of 401 ppi.
\n\nHarry McCracken, Fast Company, “A Better Window Into The World Of Apps”:
\n\n\n\n\n\n\n " + }, + { + "title" : "★ The Knives Come Out for Phil Schiller in Brian Merchant’s ‘The One Device: The Secret History of the iPhone’", + "date_published" : "2017-06-13T20:46:25Z", + "date_modified" : "2017-06-13T23:15:31Z", + "id" : "https://daringfireball.net/2017/06/the_knives_come_out_for_schiller", + "url" : "https://daringfireball.net/2017/06/the_knives_come_out_for_schiller", + "author" : { + "name" : "John Gruber" + }, + "content_html" : "\nYou can suss out a lot about Apple’s priorities from the aspects\nof a product it leaves alone and the ones it never stops\nobsessing over.
\n\nConsider the iPad. Every generation of Apple’s tablet since the\nfirst one in 2010 has had the same stated battery life–“up to 10\nhours”–which suggests that the company thinks that shooting for\nanything in excess of that would be wasted effort.
\n\nThat 2010 iPad weighed a pound and a half, and felt a bit hefty in\nthe hand. With 2013’s iPad Air, Apple whittled that down to about\na pound. And there the mid-sized iPads have stayed,\nweight-reduction mission accomplished.
\n\nHowever, when it comes to the iPad’s display, Apple has never been\nsatisfied to rest on its technological laurels.
\n
The Verge has an exclusive (and lengthy) excerpt from Brian Merchant’s The One Device: The Secret History of the iPhone, which comes out next week. Merchant seemingly has many first-hand sources on the record, including Tony Fadell and perhaps Scott Forstall. (I say “perhaps” because it’s not clear from the excerpt whether Forstall spoke to Merchant, or if Merchant got the Forstall quotes from somewhere else. It seems like there should be a lot more from Forstall in this story if he actually talked to Merchant.)
\n\nBut Fadell spoke to Merchant extensively, including this shot at Phil Schiller:
\n\n\n\n\nThe iPod phone was losing support. The executives debated which\nproject to pursue, but Phil Schiller, Apple’s head of marketing,\nhad an answer: Neither. He wanted a keyboard with hard buttons.\nThe BlackBerry was arguably the first hit smartphone. It had an\nemail client and a tiny hard keyboard. After everyone else,\nincluding Fadell, started to agree that multitouch was the way\nforward, Schiller became the lone holdout.
\n\nHe “just sat there with his sword out every time, going, ‘No,\nwe’ve got to have a hard keyboard. No. Hard keyboard.’ And he\nwouldn’t listen to reason as all of us were like, ‘No, this works\nnow, Phil.’ And he’d say, ‘You gotta have a hard keyboard!’”\nFadell says.
\n
I don’t know if it’s true or not that Schiller was singlehandedly pushing for a Blackberry-style keyboard. But even if true, it only looks foolish in hindsight, especially if this argument took place before the iPhone’s software team had come up with a proof-of-concept software keyboard. Today it’s clear that the iPhone needed a good keyboard, and that a touchscreen keyboard can be a good keyboard. Neither of those things was obvious in 2005. And in the context of this story, it’s clear that at the time of this purported argument, Steve Jobs and Apple weren’t yet sure if the iPhone should be a pocket-sized personal computer or a consumer electronics product that would have no more need for a keyboard (hardware or software) than an iPod did. My guess is that Schiller was insisting that the iPhone needed to be a personal computer, not a mere gadget, and it wasn’t unreasonable to believe a software keyboard wouldn’t be good enough. For chrissakes there were critics who insisted that the iPhone’s software keyboard wasn’t good enough for years after the iPhone actually shipped.
\n\nI do know that Schiller’s hard-charging, brusque style and his obvious political acumen have made him a lot of enemies over the years. It sounds like Fadell is one of them.
\n\nSo I’ll just say this: this story about Phil Schiller pushing for a hardware keyboard comes from one source (so far — if anyone out there can back that up, my window is always open for little birdies), and that one source is the guy who admittedly spent over a year working on iPhone prototypes with a click wheel interface.
\n\nThen there’s this:
\n\n\n\n\nSchiller didn’t have the same technological acumen as many of the\nother execs. “Phil is not a technology guy,” Brett Bilbrey, the\nformer head of Apple’s Advanced Technology Group, says. “There\nwere days when you had to explain things to him like a\ngrade-school kid.” Jobs liked him, Bilbrey thinks, because he\n“looked at technology like middle America does, like Grandma and\nGrandpa did.”
\n
Hats off to Bilbrey for putting his name on this quote, but having spoken to Schiller both on- and off-the-record many times, the idea that he “looks at technology … like Grandma and Grandpa did” and needs things explained to him “like a grade-school kid” is bullshit. Especially off-the-record, Schiller can drill down on technical details to a surprising degree. I don’t know what Schiller did to piss off Bilbrey, but Bilbrey either has a huge chip on his shoulder or was severely misquoted by Merchant.1
\n\nAnyway, I sure wish this book excerpt had come out before my live episode of The Talk Show last week — now I do have one more question I wish I’d gotten to ask Schiller.
\n\nHere’s a story from Yoni Heisler for Network World on Brett Bilbrey’s retirement from Apple in 2014. Bilbrey headed Apple’s Technology Advancement Group. Merchant describes Bilbrey as having led “Apple’s Advanced Technology Group”. It’s a small detail, and the names are clearly similar, but the Advanced Technology Group was Larry Tesler’s R&D division at Apple, from 1986-1997. It was among the numerous divisions and products that Steve Jobs shitcanned after he rejoined the company. ↩︎
\nI’ve spent the last week using a new 10.5-inch iPad Pro, and this is, in many ways, the easiest product review I’ve ever written. There are several significant improvements to the hardware, and no tradeoffs or downsides. There is no “but”.
\n\nDisplay: The new iPad Pros have the best displays of any computer I’ve ever seen. True Tone plus ProMotion is simply terrific. (The first generation 12.9-inch iPad Pro didn’t have True Tone; with these new models, the only noticeable difference between the 12.9- and 10.5-inch models is the size.) You really do have to see the 120 Hz refresh rate in person — and play with it while scrolling content on screen — to get it. You can actually read text as it’s moving during a scroll. It’s not as significant as the jump from non-retina to retina, but it’s in that ballpark.
Pencil: The latency of the Apple Pencil on a first-generation iPad Pro is the best I had ever seen for any stylus on any device at any price. The latency of the Apple Pencil on the new iPad Pro is so much better — so much closer to ink-on-paper imperceptibility — that you have to try it to believe it. It’s the one thing that really makes the first-gen iPad Pro feel “slow”.
Size: The increase in size is perfect. The footprint for a “regular” iPad has, until now, remained unchanged since the original iPad in 2010. That 9.7-inch display size was nearly perfect. This 10.5-inch display size is better though. Apple said during the keynote that typing on the on-screen keyboard is surprisingly better given just a bit more room, and I agree. And typing on the Smart Keyboard cover is way better than on last year’s 9.7-inch iPad Pro. In hand it doesn’t feel bigger at all. It feels like there were no trade-offs whatsoever in increasing the display size and overall device footprint. Part of that is because the weight has remained completely unchanged. I have had zero problems — not one — with the decreased bezel area. Apple’s inadvertent touch detection game is on point.
Battery: Battery life is great, as expected.
Performance: Apple’s in-house chip team continues to amaze. No one buys an iPad because of CPU benchmarks, but the new iPad Pro’s CPU performance is mind-boggling. Forget about comparisons to the one-port MacBook — the iPad Pro blows that machine out of the water performance-wise. The astounding thing is that the new iPad Pro holds its own against the MacBook Pro in single-core performance — around 3,900 on the Geekbench 4 benchmark for the iPad Pro vs. around 4,200–4,400 for the various configurations of 13- and 15-inch MacBook Pros.1 Multi-core performance has effectively doubled from the first generation of iPad Pro. That sort of year-over-year increase just doesn’t happen anymore, but here we are. The new iPad Pro gets a multi-core Geekbench 4 score of around 9200; the brand-new Core M3-based MacBook gets a multi-core score of around 6800. Again, this isn’t why people buy iPads — the iPad took off like a rocket in 2010 back when it was way slower (way way way slower) than even the slowest MacBook — but I think it is vastly underappreciated just how significantly Apple’s chip team is pulling ahead of the industry, especially Intel.2
All that said, the real story of these new iPad Pro models can’t be told today, because that story is iOS 11. I think iOS 11’s iPad-focused features are the entire reason why Apple waited until WWDC to unveil them. They could have held an event for them back in April, when they released the new starting-at-just-$329 9.7-inch iPad, but if they did, the only new software they could have demoed was Clips. I love Clips, but it’s just a fun little tool and doesn’t show off anything particular to iPad compared to iPhone.
\n\nAgain, the new iPad Pro hardware is almost too good to be true, but the iPad story Apple unveiled last week is iOS 11.
\n\nIt’s not fair to review a product running a developer beta of the OS — let alone the first (and generally buggiest) beta. So let’s stop the “review” right here: the new iPad Pros running iOS 10.3.2 are the best iPads ever made. You shouldn’t hesitate to buy one today, and if you do get one now, you should wait until iOS 11 ships in the fall to upgrade, or at the very least wait for a non-developer public beta of iOS 11 this summer before upgrading.
\n\nBut if you are reckless enough to install the iOS 11 beta on the new iPad Pro? Holy smokes is this better. I used the iPad Pro for a full week with iOS 10.3.2 because that’s the product that’s shipping, but after upgrading to iOS 11 beta 1 this morning and using it to write this entire review,3 I’m just blown away by how much more useful this machine is, and how much easier it is to work with 5 or 6 apps at a time.
\n\nI would never recommend running a beta of any OS on any device that’s used for production purposes, so don’t take this as such, but for me personally, I can’t see going back to iOS 10.3.2 on any iPad that can handle it. It feels like a hand has been untied from behind my back, and this amazing hardware has finally been allowed to run free.
\n\nYou can browse Geekbench’s database of results for Mac and iOS. ↩︎
\nApple’s A10X chip is so high-performing that I think it’s put Apple in a slightly uncomfortable position marketing-wise. They can’t brag about it fully without making Intel (and by implication, their own MacBooks) look bad, and Intel remains an important partner for Apple. I don’t think it’s a coincidence that the most impressive iPad demo during the keynote (and the one that contained the most bragging about its performance compared to PCs) was done by a third-party developer — Ash Hewson of Serif, demonstrating Affinity Photo — not Greg Joswiak or anyone else from Apple. ↩︎︎
\nFull disclosure: I went back to my Mac to write these 3 footnotes. That’s due more to the byzantine way I mark up footnotes than any limitation inherent to iOS vs. MacOS. But it feels worth noting. ↩︎︎
\nGreat investigative piece by Johnny Lin looking into a top-10 highest grossing app named “Mobile protection :Clean & Security VPN” (punctuation and grammatical errors sic), from a developer named Ngan Vo Thi Thuy:
\n\n\n\n\n“Full Virus, Malware scanner”: What? I’m pretty sure it’s\nimpossible for any app to scan my iPhone for viruses or malware,\nsince third party apps are sandboxed to their own data, but let’s\nkeep reading…
\n\n“You will pay $99.99 for a 7-day subscription”
\n\nUhh… come again?
\n
There should be no “virus and malware” scanners in the App Store. None. iOS does not need anti-virus software. The App Store sandboxing rules mean that anti-virus software couldn’t really do anything useful anyway. And by allowing them to be listed on the store, it creates the false impression that Apple thinks you might need anti-virus software.
\n\nBut do-nothing anti-virus utilities that are scamming people into $100/week subscriptions? That’s downright criminal.
\n\nLin shows that “Mobile protection :Clean & Security VPN” is not alone. The productivity top-grossing list is riddled with similar scam apps.
\n\nGiven how many legitimate developers are still having problems getting their apps approved due to seemingly capricious App Store reviewer decisions, it’s doubly outrageous that these apps have made their way onto the store in the first place. These are the exact sort of apps that the App Store review process should be primarily looking to block.
\n\nAnd there is no excuse for Apple not having flagged them after the fact, once they started generating significant revenue. It’s downright mind boggling that this horrendous “Mobile protection :Clean & Security VPN” app made it all the way into the top 10 without getting flagged.
\n\nBased on Lin’s research, the pattern is simple:
\n\nApple needs to remove these apps from the App Store, and prevent such apps from getting into the store in the first place. They should reconsider the effects of allowing developers to buy their way to the top spot in search results. And they should police the top-grossing lists for apps that are pulling scams — the most important scams to catch are the successful ones.
\n\nLastly, every single dollar these apps have generated should be refunded to the victims of these scams.
\n\n\n\n " + }, + { + "title" : "★ Update on The Talk Show Live From WWDC 2017", + "date_published" : "2017-06-02T05:41:06Z", + "date_modified" : "2017-06-02T06:13:18Z", + "id" : "https://daringfireball.net/2017/06/update_on_the_talk_show_live_from_wwdc_2017", + "url" : "https://daringfireball.net/2017/06/update_on_the_talk_show_live_from_wwdc_2017", + "author" : { + "name" : "John Gruber" + }, + "content_html" : "\nOn Wednesday I put the first 500 tickets on sale for next week’s live show from WWDC. They sold out in 7 minutes.
\n\nThe California Theatre in San Jose has both an orchestra level and a balcony. That first bunch of tickets separated the two. After talking with the staff at the theater today, they recommended making all tickets general admission and allowing their ushers to fill the orchestra level first, and then direct remaining ticket holders to the balcony. So, all tickets, including those sold Wednesday, are now simply general admission. Everyone paid the same price, so I think this is fair, but I do apologize for any confusion. The theater is beautiful, and there are no bad seats.
\n\nThe next batch of tickets will go on sale today, Friday, at 1p ET/10a PT. Given what happened Wednesday, I expect them to sell out in a few minutes. I hate writing that because it sounds braggy, but I’m putting it out there just as fair warning. You’re going to have to act quick and maybe get lucky.
\n\nIf you want a ticket and wind up not getting one, there will be a live audio stream for everyone to listen to. This year we are not going to attempt to stream live video. Instead we’re going to work hard to get edited video of the event up on the web as soon as possible after the show is over. If you just can’t wait, listen to the live audio. If you want to see the show, wait for the video — it should be up some time on Wednesday at the latest.
\n\nIf you do get a ticket or already have one:
\n\n
![TechCrunch](\"/misc/2017/06/dickbar-techcrunch.png\"){kind=link}
![Vox](\"/misc/2017/06/dickbar-vox.png\"){kind=link}
![The Verge](\"/misc/2017/06/dickbar-theverge.png\"){kind=link}
![Mashable](\"/misc/2017/06/dickbar-mashable.png\"){kind=link}
![Wired](\"/misc/2017/06/dickbar-wired.png\"){kind=link}